this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
533 points (99.4% liked)

Mildly Interesting

26215 readers
533 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] victorz@lemmy.world 81 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (12 children)

Is there a difference in tone or meaning between accidentally and inadvertently? I feel like accidentally means they did something that was a bad thing.

[–] Contentedness@lemmy.nz 32 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I agree it seems a strange choice of words.

Japanese monks and emperors kept meticulous records of cherry blossom festivals for 1,200 years. ~~They accidentally~~ In doing so they built the world's longest climate dataset

Something like that seems more straightforward.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I think “inadvertently” fits in that it isn’t what they were intending to do.

“Accidentally” feels sorta judgy.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah. “It was an accident” sounds like pleading, excusing. “I inadvertently…” sounds like an explanation of the facts. imo

[–] petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I think a journalist might choose the word 'unintentionally'; inadvertently is a bit clunky, it lacks a bit of music, and it gives me a sense of slapstick comedy. This sentence, for instance, "Having inadvertently caused the death of her son," sounds to me like the son died as a result of some Pink Panther bit.

I don't think 'accidentally' here needs to feel judgy per se, but it is hard to imagine an English major choosing it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] xploit@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Mr Bob Ross would like a word...
I agree with you on inadvertently, but accident, if I'm not mistaken would generally considered something where you do not inherently attribute blame. At least thats what I recall being justification for making the change in UK in calling traffic 'incidents' incidents instead of accidents several years back. Dunno if it stuck though.

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

UK in calling traffic ‘incidents’ incidents instead of accidents several years back. Dunno if it stuck though.

Wait is that real? I thought it was just a joke when it was said in Hot Fuzz

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Interesting. Although I still maintain that accident bears a negative connotation, even though blame isn't necessarily a factor. As if the outcome was a negative thing, rather than a positive, as in this case.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They accidentally became climate change wackos supporting a communist agenda to make everyone gay and push taxes supporting public transportation.

[–] yyprum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Hmm not necessarily, accidentally has no negative implication unlike accident usually has. In this particular case the meaning of accidentally is synonym with unexpectedly or by chance.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

My question was a bit rhetorical. In my opinion there is a negative connotation to accidentally in this case as well. I would personally use a different word. 👍

[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (19 children)

Accidents don’t have to be bad? Accident means just “not on purpose” it has no connotation either way

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] jpeps@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Was going to say this myself and then saw your comment. Totally agree. 'Accidently' practically implies that the record keeping itself only happened because some pencils happened to fall on paper. They did exactly what they intended to and used it for their own purpose. It just turned out to have a different purpose, too.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

That's an even better way of looking at it, to avoid "accidentally". Great point!

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Incidentally would be more accurate perhaps.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I looked up the definitions of incidentally and inadvertently, and inadvertently is a better fit IMO.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Aww, shit. Now there's record all over the floor... I'll go get the data bin...

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You got the statistimop there as well? (I'm reaching...)

Love the user name, by the way. 👌

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 weeks ago

I agree, but I think here "accidentally" is used in an ironic manner because this is of course not actually a bad thing.

[–] j5y7@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

I salute you. Few are those who take the time to find appropriate word for the meaning.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 24 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

"Kill them all. Steal their data." - MAGA

[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Is that dataset up anywhere as a CSV?

I'd really love to build a lesson around it!

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 weeks ago

Well, glaciers keep the longest climate datasets, it's just in a format that takes some work to translate.

[–] zout@fedia.io 10 points 2 weeks ago
[–] deliciEsteva@piefed.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

So temperatures are going down soon, right? RIGHT?

[–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You know, it's the weather. Temperature goes up. Temperature goes down. EZPZ

[–] deliciEsteva@piefed.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Just what I needed to hear. I would have rejected any other answer anyway. So I can happily go back to sleep now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

citation for claim that it's the longest-dated climate dataset?

[–] Sylence@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not the longest climate dataset, but it may be the longest directly recorded by humans. All of these types of data are climate proxies (alternate indicators we can use to gain information about historic climates), the longest of which are ice core measurements.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Idk, egyptian priests kept records of the groundwater levels to predict the nile flood times to keep the peasants in check, and that could count as a climate dataset that far predates and is longer than this.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Do floods correlate well with the climate there, or are they affected by something else, too? If they are not much affected, then that could be a dataset indeed

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 1 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments
view more: next ›