this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
73 points (98.7% liked)

Gaming

4707 readers
99 users here now

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!


Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:


If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IntrovertTurtle@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 week ago

Fuck yes another win for Palworld!

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Alright Palworld...gonna update your game again?

[–] Know_not_Scotty_does@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They should, the throw summon mechanic made the game more fun.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Was there really that much difference? I've only played the non-throw version, I think.

Yes, it really forced you to get close to the pals/npcs before starting your attacks. Before you could game it a bit and lob them from longer range to kite them a bit. It helped when you had level mismatches and was generally more fun imo.

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

IIRC the more problematic legal challenges are in Japan, whose patent laws are insane.

[–] warmaster@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This has to be April's fools. Something this good can't be happening.

[–] RiQuY@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

Fuck Nintendo.

[–] ianhclark510@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I can’t tell if this legit or more Trump meddling

Nintendo is/was/maybe I got misinformation suing the US over tariffs?

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

Nah it was an insane patent that got reevaluated after a crap ton of complaints because Nintendo filed it in light of Palworld and their eventual lawsuit.

It really should not have been approved in the first place, and the scope was so wide that it drew a ton of attention from businesses completly unrelated to gaming.

The US tarrif thing is separate, so it probably didn't have any effect here.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I can’t tell if this legit or more Trump meddling

Over this piddly shit? Really, you actually can't tell if this wasn't Trump meddling? Nintendo got the patent last September under Trump's acting USPTO director Coke Morgan Stewart. Two months later, the new director John A. Squires ordered it reviewed (bad patents fall through the cracks all the time; IP attorneys have described patent lawsuits as a "minefield" for both parties). Now, in a non-final decision for which Nintendo has two months to respond, it has been revoked. Nintendo didn't even respond to the patent reexamination. I suggest reading the Games Fray article referenced by the linked content mill article poorly regurgitating it.