this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
145 points (99.3% liked)

politics

29145 readers
3555 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

An unprecedented number of House Republicans are opting to retire or pursue other offices, complicating Speaker Mike Johnson’s (R-La.) bid to fend off a potential blue wave in the 2026 midterms and preserve his razor-thin majority.

So far, 36 House Republicans — including the most recent, Rep. Sam Graves (Mo.) — have announced they will leave their seat at the end of their term, pointing to legislative gridlock, family commitments or a wish to make room for the next generation of leaders.

That total exceeds the record set in the 2018 midterm cycle, when 34 House Republicans chose not to run for reelection and Democrats regained control of the lower chamber under President Trump’s first term.

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago

and just like that, a brand new wave of conservative douchebag lobbyists was born. Every single one of these pieces of shit enabled a fascist takeover of our country. They should hang with the rest of'em.

[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 4 points 22 hours ago

He joins a roster of Republicans across the ideological spectrum who have also called it quits in Congress

The whole Republican ideological spectrum? All the way from Asshole to Raging Lunatic Nazi Asshole?

[–] modestmeme@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Something wrong with your party? Stay and fight for the greater good. But nope, three dozen cowards silently walk away.

[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's what happens when the party repeatedly purges anyone that has any principles beyond self-interest and blind loyalty to a corrupt leader.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think it's more that they see the writing on the wall... The people want consequences. There's likely to be trials

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Nah, not unless the Democratic party finds its balls. Mark my works, Trump will kick the bucket long before they decide he's guilty of something and one or two fall boys will get showy trials but then it will be 'a time for healing' or some bullshit about unity.

You can't live unless you carve out the cancer and right now I don't see any incentives that would make them do that.

It'll be 8 years of Democrats (if there isn't major election interference) and you'll be back where you were with a Trump stooge if he's still around or maybe one of his kids. FPTP pretty much guarantees it.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Trump would not be able to cause as much harm without all the evil self-servicing minions to carry out his whims. Trump may be old, Trump may have had a rubber stamp Supreme Court say he has complete immunity, but his minions haven’t. Consider the silver lining when he passes that all those minions are subject to the law without his blanket pardons. Thats the real opportunity

[–] chahn.chris@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

The US has a long history of not cutting out the cancer.

[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't think we will see a single one in a courtroom. We don't arrest the rich and powerful.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 16 hours ago

They're house members. They're generally not all that rich and powerful, they're protected because they're useful

They'll be thrown in front of the mob the second a billionaire feels tight under the collar

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Who said anything about court rooms? A lot of these pissants would be prime meat for a lynch mob, especially if the economy implodes like it's looking like it will.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

They can quit, but they still caused it. They are still on a list.

[–] Sculptor9157@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

Possibly. It could also be because they are all geriatric fucks.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They never would have joined the Republican party if they gave a shit about the greater good

Well the Tau party is basically non-existent.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There’s a good chance many of the cowards are “the good ones”. Surely some of them have enough of a sense of morality to not want to be part of this ….. to not kiss the feet of the golden idol

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Their sitting congresspeople. They don't have to win an election to affect change. They can simply use their vote to go against the immoral legislation put before them. Instead, they're just heading for the exits and months or years of voting for the horrible stuff.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I never said they weren’t cowards. A craven sycophant can still recognize how far they’ve fallen and have an attack of conscience

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Rats 'retiring' from the sinking ship.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Getting while the gettings good for sure.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Their "next generation of leaders" are all coked out MAGAts who are frothing at the mouth to bring fascism and Nazi ideals to the country

[–] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

So, um, vote to fix it, cowards.

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

...right through the revolving door onto K Street?

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Or prior to the possible trials coming after next election cycle.

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fucking cowards. They deserve everything they get

[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 day ago

Extremely Wealthy with Unprecedented Freedoms!

[–] ravenaspiring@sh.itjust.works -3 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I am hoping for a blue wave here top, but worth noting that so far another 20 or so other House member are not seeking reelection. A total of 57 are bowing out.

Worth noting that being a politician is a much harder job now than it used to be and the security of it is a big challenge. They are now basically in a state of "psychology terror" due to the political violence that is going on against both sides. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/political-violence-distorting-american-lawmaking

"Both sides."

Fuck off.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 22 hours ago

Which republican congesspeople have been physically harmed? That’s insanely disconnected from reality.