this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
46 points (96.0% liked)

Canada

11794 readers
594 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 10 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

And we've also completely given up on doing anything about it.

[–] rabber@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I know people in Alberta who believe the fires are intentionally set by the liberals to make climate change seem real

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 hours ago

And the same liberals sneak chemicals into their coffee to give them a micropenis.

[–] dom@lemmy.ca 5 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

But its soooooo expensiveeeeeeeeeee I'd rather just let the country burn

-certain types of people

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

Remember when Canada sucked its own dick in the early days of carbon accounting:

"We're fine! We have these big forests that are carbon sinks!"

Yeah...

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 5 points 19 hours ago

We're just pretending now that wildfire smoke doesn't count in our national emissions, and that whoever smelled it dealt it.

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 7 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Remember when the article was talking about air quality and fine particulate matter, not carbon emissions?

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Remember when the article was talking about forest fires, like my comment about forest fires?

[–] Scotty@scribe.disroot.org -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Only 13 of 143 countries met the World Health Organization’s recommended limits (WHO)

[–] dudesss@lemmy.ca -1 points 14 hours ago

Wtf Scotty, this is a serious issue. Quit fucking around.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

If everybody else shits on the floor we should too. Amazing logic there Scotty, as always.

[–] Scotty@scribe.disroot.org 0 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Why so uneasy? Air pollution is a serious and, above all, a global issue. It's sad that Canada is among the least 25% polluted states while still above the threshold. Most other large economies are lagging behind with the second-largest economy, China, facing an air pollution 4 times higher than Canada's.

@dudesss@lemmy.ca

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 hours ago

does google not exist at the troll farm you're working at? https://www.iqair.com/ca/world-air-quality-ranking

[–] dudesss@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

If what you say is correct, China is doing something majorly correct around air pollution if they only produce 4 times the same. Even if their per-capita pollution was the same as ours, things would so much worse right now.

[–] Scotty@scribe.disroot.org 0 points 4 hours ago

Yeah? China's government started to censor air quality data in the 2010s. They simply told the company that made the 'China Air Quality Index' app for Apple and Android mobile to stop displaying pollution levels that exceeded an official point (you'll find ample evidence for this across the web). I don't know whether they still censor it in China, but the air pollution there is still alarmingly high.

To use your words: This is a serious issue. Quit fucking around.