this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
52 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

6431 readers
317 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Any news that are at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies or tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Whoops! Who could possibly have seen something like this coming?

Highlight from the article

But it feels like everyone in this world—or this country, at least—is being treated as an unpaid beta tester for technologies for which they never asked, and from which someone else stands to make a ton of money. The “move fast, break things” approach of tech bros is obnoxious enough when it comes to software, but it’s irresponsible and potentially deadly when it comes to things like cars and delivery robots.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 17 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Example #42069 of why relying on vision alone for navigation is a terrible idea. At these speeds a $5 ultrasonic SONAR would've prevented this.

[–] howmuchlonger@lemmy.org 3 points 5 hours ago

It probably had one. The software just probably sucks

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

About that much for a time of flight sensor that is faster and more reliable than sonar. But add them both for redundancy is the best.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

ToF will generally go through glass (as long as it's translucent to the relevant IR range).

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

They have these on a college campus nearby. I once watched one of these things try to get from a walkway onto a road after a delivery.

It didn't just backtrack the way it came. It was looking for a sloping ramp, but the sidewalk ledge was too high for its tiny wheels. It kept going back and forth, retracing the same paths over and over, failing, then returning to the original location, turning around and doing the whole thing again. I stopped paying attention after 15 minutes of this.

It was like watching a drunk come out of a bar and stumble around trying to find his parked car.

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Knew it was Chicago. I really hate these things but I enjoy faking them out when I pass them. It’s the little things.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

There might be a solution in popular culture:

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 6 hours ago

saw this on the local news.