this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2026
27 points (100.0% liked)

World News

3249 readers
171 users here now

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] amemorablename@lemmygrad.ml 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Reads like a big load of bullshit to me. It's the Korea Times, an occupied Korea publication. And it has such incredible analysis as:

Kim warned that any South Korean provocation against the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea would “face merciless consequences without hesitation” and reaffirmed the North’s nuclear posture, saying Pyongyang would “firmly consolidate our status as a nuclear weapon state with no retreat.”

The term “hostile state” was first mentioned by Kim in late December 2023, when he said “the two Koreas are hostile nations at war” during a party meeting. Ever since, Kim has repeated the term regardless of presidential changes in South Korea. While Pyongyang has not publicly released its revised constitution, analysts widely expect it to legalize or stipulate the language.

In response, Seoul’s unification ministry said it would press ahead with efforts toward peaceful coexistence while keeping unification as its long-term goal.

“The South Korean government will continue to make consistent efforts under the policy of developing inter-Korean relations into peaceful and coexisting relationships centered around unification.”

So basically the usual imperialist nonsense. "Your self-defense is hostility. My occupation and domination is a desire for peace and coexistence."

If we compare it to the situation with Iran, I think it becomes more obvious. The DPRK is just talking in similar ways as Iran did, that a hostile entity on its doorstep will face retaliation if it does an act of war.

Edited to add: What we maybe can meaningfully glean from it is the empire may be wanting to start another war by getting something going between occupied Korea and the DPRK. Considering the pattern the US has been using lately of talking about peace translating to "trying to get their guard down so we can attack."

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 1 day ago

Gonna have to wait for KCNA to publish the actual proceedings.

[–] ComradePupIvy@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This feels like lots of speculation based off of Kim saying the RoK is functionaly a hostile power. Thats just the reality of the situation no matter what the claims are.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I do hope that DPRK takes a harder stance regarding the south though.

[–] ComradePupIvy@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hope they do aswell, and would not be suprised of they do, but I dont think the DPRK will stop considering the south Iligitimate as the article implies

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 1 day ago

oh yeah for sure

[–] Kalashnikov@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I did not join Lemmygrad to be linked to Occupied Korean propaganda media. What the fuck is this.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If we discarded every source that had a liberal or capitalist slant, we would effectively have to stop reading 99% of Western media. We would be blinding ourselves to the very mechanisms we are trying to dismantle. We are adults with functioning brains. We possess the capacity for critical analysis. We should be able to read a piece of liberal slop, identify the ideological framing, strip it away, and analyze the material conditions they are reporting on or trying to obscure.

From a dialectical perspective, it's useful to read western media because it is the mouthpiece of the ruling class. It tells you exactly what capital is thinking, what they are afraid of, and how they are strategizing to protect their interests. You cannot effectively dismantle an argument if you refuse to understand its internal structure and logic.

Running away from information because it doesn’t align with your worldview is what liberals do when they retreat into their MSNBC bubbles. As communists, we should be secure enough in our own position to read sources we abhor, understand them, and approach their claims from a position of knowledge. Ruthless criticism of all that exists includes reading the media from occupied Korea.

[–] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 1 day ago

The fact that it is Occupied Korea media should make you be very skeptical of whatever they write. Don't take anything there at face value. But you should nonetheless be aware of what they write, if for no other reason than to know what propaganda your enemy is disseminating.