this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2026
83 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

82884 readers
3547 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

We are getting to the point where a Butlerian jihad will be necessary. Though shalt not make a machine in the image type vibe. The arts exist for people to explore and enjoy.

This criminal is guilty of fraud, similar to Trump. Cunningly he did it in a way that was not easily detectable. How many others are now considering ways to do something similar. So to make a personal decision not to use AI is not going to affect these fraudsters.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 3 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Who gives a shit about the fraud? Nobody actually enjoys listening to AI music and he defrauded Spotify. Good for him, frankly, shame he got caught. Obligatory fuck AI.

[–] RichardDegenne@lemmy.zip 1 points 14 minutes ago

You'd be surprised with the amount of people who love the Muzak-filled playlists made by Spotify.

[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 1 points 1 hour ago

The article says he took money from the pool that pays actual artists. The fraud was against them not specifically Spotify. Personally, I think Spotify, Netflix, Amazon are abominations in the way they use their control to defraud suppliers and customers alike and should be reigned in but ripping off what little artists get is bad. Not victimless.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 46 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

The case against Smith highlights a growing problem for the music industry that had largely recovered from the Napster music piracy era of the early 2000s only to be faced with an AI-based threat to revenue from music streaming platforms such as Amazon Music, Apple Music, Spotify and YouTube Music.

This is supposed to make me feel sympathetic to the multi billion dollar corporations? Fuck all the way off with that shit.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 hours ago

Let them fight.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 12 points 5 hours ago

The artists get essentially none of that money, so when they talk about the "music industry" they are talking about all the parasites feeding off them. Rob them for all they are worth.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 21 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

"Due to lower than expected album sales, James Hetfield has had to settle for a solid gold swimming pool instead of the solid platinum pool he really wanted."

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Money good. Napster bad.

[–] schwim@piefed.zip 19 points 8 hours ago

The ONLY reason the industry cares is because of the fake streamers part of this. They not only welcome ai music, platforms like Spotify are creating ai music of their own so they can cut out the pittance they pay the artists.

This is not a goodguys-win story.

[–] ji88aja88a@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

when do the ai owners start paying the damages on stealing content to power the models? it's kinda the same..

[–] ada@piefed.blahaj.zone 11 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like I'm missing something in this article. If he was taking the music but also faking the play counts with bots, how were other artists missing out?

[–] faltryka@lemmy.world 16 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

The streaming service pays them out of a pool proportionally. So he basically diluted the distribution from that pool, resulting in lower payments to everyone else.

[–] nirodhaavidya@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

How is that different from Spotify producing their own AI-gen music? Seems like that's 3-4 minutes of listening that otherwise would've been spent listening to an artist.

[–] faltryka@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago
[–] ada@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 7 hours ago

That would be the missing bit! Cheers

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 hours ago

Oh no!

I hope all the details are shared so that we can all carefully avoid doing the same to those music industry bas...s-fishing executives.

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world -1 points 8 hours ago

While I am not against AI as a tool, this person being a tool with AI generated slop remixes everywhere as a hustle is not approve.

[–] org@lemmy.org 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

While not being rich enough to have fuck you money and get away with it.

[–] org@lemmy.org 2 points 6 hours ago

Right. Should gone slower, more secure, settled for a million. Bird in the hand.