this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2026
249 points (94.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

11424 readers
1715 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BaraCoded@literature.cafe 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.today 4 points 1 month ago

that reply is all you need, time to start looking for something else

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm surprised no one in the comments noticed that the person getting paid the same for working harder is a woman. This is sadly the norm in many businesses including those that I've worked for. That made this seem awfully likely to be real other than only a moron would actually put this in writing. I think this lady should just start doing as much work as her salary dictates. There is clearly no benefit to busting your ass if you get paid shit. Also, start looking for a new place of employment.

[–] liuther9@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've seen the opposite. Junior dev girl got 5x raise while I got only 20% as strong middle almost equalizing our salaries. In fact where I live I have never seen such thing. Only social cute ones usually get good raise. Introverts never

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

As I said in another comment, I've seen it at multiple places I've worked. I am aware of the "cute girl gets favored" issue, though never in a technical role. Honestly, I've never see a girl dev that fit your description at any those places either heh. I imagine they probably never made it through the hiring process as it was no secret that the bosses were sexist.

[–] liuther9@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Tell me where did you see woman selectively getting underpaid, which field?

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Quite literally every corporation I've worked in until my current company pulled this shit, but very specifically in the technical roles. It usually led to the women in question leaving, and perhaps that was the intent. When I was doing interviews for my team, I had even heard my boss's boss mentioning how picking one of the female candidates would be "cheaper" and I didn't understand until later what he meant. My direct boss at that company was one of the few to buck that trend where he could honestly, but that place screwed me over quite a few times in other ways. For the record, none of these gender pay issues hindered me, I'm a guy.

[–] Retail4068@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

You could read between the lines and realize your attitude affects the team in a negative way.

[–] huppakee@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

From https://www.wikihow.com/Quiet-Quit#How-to-Quiet-Quit-Your-Job-.28Without-Getting-Fired.29)

How to Quiet Quit Your Job (Without Getting Fired)

  • Step 1 Stop doing any tasks that aren’t in your job description.
  • Step 2 Stop showing up early to work and only arrive on time.
  • Step 3 Stop staying late in the office and leave on time.
  • Step 4 Refuse office communications outside of working hours.
  • Step 5 Don’t take work home with you.
  • Step 6 Don’t attend non-mandatory meetings or social work functions.

My opinion, only quit if you a) can do those things and b) want to extract value aside from money during the time you spend working.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If I quit, and the boss man is like "you can't quit, you're fired!" I'd be like "woohoo! unemployment!" which I wasnt gonna get by quitting.

Edit: I missed the quiet part. Still gon a leave this here tho.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pigup@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago
[–] halfapage@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Marcus gives the best bjs

[–] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Feels like the scene from The Other Guys about how you’re valuable for doing the work we don’t want to

[–] thingAmaBob@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[–] dnick@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

Weirdly, both are kind of true. You should be pissed, but he is also right, he just shouldn’t have said it. Think of it this way, though, a supervisor usually makes more than the people they supervise even though by definition they often do less of the actual work. Same with management. Getting other people motivated (if he actually does do that) is worth something. On the other hand,if you’re really doing twice as much work, you may literally just be overworking or should find another job where that is actually useful.

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 1 points 1 month ago

It's so weird that they went through with justifying the difference in pay (which I don't think they actually had to do in such detail) and somehow... they didn't stop halfway through and realize that doesn't actually justify anything. The "we value your attitude" part is exactly why she should be paid equally. I mean, they literally offered her a leverage to use in negociation.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›