this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2026
198 points (99.0% liked)

politics

28978 readers
1835 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The account is an example of how artificial intelligence is being used to push political agendas in wartime

MAGA has been swooning over photos of a blonde U.S. Army soldier, walking defiantly alongside President Donald Trump to carry out the America First agenda. But there’s just one problem — she’s AI.

Images most likely generated by artificial intelligence depicted Jessica Foster wearing heels on a U.S. warship in the Strait of Hormuz, posing for selfies with Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, and giving a speech at the president’s “Board of Peace” event earlier this year.

The account, which has since been taken down, gained more than one million followers since its mysterious creator started posting on it four months ago, The Washington Post reports.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

They didn't even register the triple boob, a news article will not inform them.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 25 points 7 hours ago (4 children)

if you're stupid enough to believe this... you're stupid enough to be a Republican.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 12 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Where are my pantyhose! I'm going to war!

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Ohh sexy war.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 hours ago

Are you ready to go yet?

Hang on, I'm almost finished putting my 16 fingers on!

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

So maybe it's because my brain is currently fried from overheating and just getting done with work, but is it just me are the proportions off? Like the head is too big for the body, probably miss matched training data.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 hours ago

For me it's the skirt and pole that make no sense

[–] MeatPilot@sh.itjust.works 11 points 7 hours ago

"We need more heels on the ground!"

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 9 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Believing is one thing, but in what world do you join the army or support terrorism because there is some hot chick there?

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

You gotta remember how dumb some folks are

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago

For a lot of folks, sadly, this one.

[–] FrChazzz@lemmus.org 16 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

How many of the accounts that followed this one were actually bot/“AI” accounts designed to do nothing but help boost shit like this to a place where the press reports on it?

[–] TheKaul@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 hours ago

Yeah no way I'm believing 1 million real people followed this account. Would be hard to believe even if it said 10,000

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 66 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (9 children)

What is a woman?

Is this a woman?

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 30 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

This might have too many rights to be a woman.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 hours ago

They definitely give this way more power than they would any woman.

[–] funksoulkitchen@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 hours ago

No that's an Xbox

[–] mouse@piefed.world 4 points 6 hours ago

We're going to need to see what's in it's panties!

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 hours ago

A woman is clearly the opposite of man so thusly I propose that a woman is a feathered quadruped.

[–] sbbq@lemmy.zip 12 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

A miserable little pile of secrets?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 9 hours ago (2 children)
[–] sbbq@lemmy.zip 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 hours ago

That's the original draft of the Whitney Houston hit btw:

🎵 Name every woman, it's all on youuu!🎵

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Aaah! Ah fuck, oh god! Aaaaaaah!

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 hours ago

Checks out. I went to high school with her.

She was voted most likely to have paperwork problems.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The woman is IN the computer?!

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

Hansel is so hot right now

[–] Gork@sopuli.xyz 2 points 7 hours ago

Those are some fine angles, mmhmmm

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz 44 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (4 children)

Any MAGA who fell for this is beyond stupid (plus utterly unfamiliar with the military). Her uniform is wrong (skirt WAYYY too high). No one wears dress uniforms underway at sea in general, ESPECIALLY an enlisted soldier (who would likely be nowhere near a ship, even more especially in dress uniform). The ribbons on her dress uniform not only change from picture to picture, but are also the wrong size (sometimes) and not even actual US ribbons. I've never seen a regulation name tag say "US ARMY" and not a name. The undershirt in her camis isn't regulation. And this was just a quick look at the photos and only tangentially around the Army at work.

Oh and that's before the visible glitches because it's AI. This is laughably low effort.

EDIT: Damn, they didn't even use a real ship as the background. It's supposed to be a destroyer, and there are no US destroyers with an aft-facing bridge or part of the superstructure forward of the bridge windows. Just truly WTF

EDIT 2.0: I just saw a couple other photos because I got curious. One has her as a one-star general 😂, and a couple others have her wearing a (shitty looking) Combat Infantry Badge, which is only awarded for being in combat. So, I guess women CAN hack it in combat! Hegseth must be in shambles.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 2 points 3 hours ago

Even without the technical knowledge of military uniforms, one look at any of these and my mind is just screaming "probably fake".

IDK why exactly.

I think it's mostly that she's so young and beautiful and doesn't have that vapid dead-behind-the-eyes look that most MAGA women do. She looks like a happy vivacious young woman, not like a highly decorated military officer.

IDK how to say this but if women like her actually existed we would already be overrun with real photos of them in the oval office.

The other red flags that don't require technical knowledge that trip the "probably fake" alert buzzer:

Who takes a selfie with POTUS in the oval office?

Why is she wearing a crop top that looks like it's from cost-co?

Why is she standing around on a ship in high heels looking serious?

Why is she walking around on a military base with Trump without the usual entourage?

[–] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 29 points 9 hours ago

She's hot and it's pro-Trump. Why should they care if it's real or not if it tickles their...confirmation bias?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 7 points 7 hours ago

How about high heels on a carrier...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Janx@piefed.social 17 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

These MAGA freaks are just perfectly positioned to be scammed with AI, aren't they? Blind patriotism/nationalism, easy to manufacture images of the stereotypical people they hate, rejection of science and facts, unshakable loyalty to the Pedophile-In-Chief, zero critical thinking skills, intense tribalism, single echo-chamber source of "news", love for a pretty, white face, low intelligence, etc. I know some of them have already fallen for scams, but I bet it's nothing like what we'll see in the future, most likely by other Republicans...

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 18 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

The pic of her in a vehicle with her bare feet sticking out the window appeared to show her with three boobs under her shirt, her right side boob having it's own seeming cleavage.

[–] Janx@piefed.social 11 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

Without seeking it out, I've seen 2 versions of that image: that one, and one with 2 boobs. Hopefully they were fooled be the lesser alien-looking one...

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mx_smith@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

There were 2 versions, one doctored to make it super AI looking with three boobs and 6 toes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dizzle18@lemmy.zip 13 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Sometimes I really wish I had the time and energy to get in on this grift. These dumbfucks are the easiest people on the planet to rob. I just need a truckload full of shitty, Chinese made MAGA merch and a stand at some county fair, and I’d be fucking rich. Unfortunately, I have no desire whatsoever to be associated in any way with these fascist shit stains. The money is just not worth having that stench rub off on me.

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

There have to have been a lot of people in MAGA that thought this way at one point that got a bit too close to the event horizon and got sucked in. If you play a character full time, you eventually realize you’re no longer acting.

[–] zakobjoa@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

"We can always tell" motherfuckers

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 8 hours ago

“wHaT iS a WoMaN?” Not goddamn pixels, that’s for sure.

load more comments
view more: next ›