this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2026
205 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

83896 readers
5615 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works 66 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Every day I thank the Gods for having met my partner, and no longer needing to use dating apps is a huge part of it.

Anyway, does the word "enshittification" even make sense when the service was already shit to begin with? How do we even refer to a move like this? "Shittiness diversification"?

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 month ago

Passing the shit event horizon.

[–] Brewchin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Who'd have imagined that "jumping the enshittification" would be a thing.

[–] zewm@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I know this is a hard concept to understand, but you can still meet other human beings without the use of a dating app.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Why would that person want to meet other people? They clearly stated that they're happily off the market.

Or are you just AI too? Either way, you didn't seem to understand the message.

[–] Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You must be so much fun to hang out with IRL.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 6 points 1 month ago

Doubt they can read any better there.

[–] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Tinder scanning my photo library, reading my diary and social media. Then it automatically generates perfect pictures and text for my dating profile. Then an AI bot looks at profiles for me and chats with other AI bots to set up dates. It then automatically adds a date to my calendar and makes a reservation in a restaurant. Nice.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Honestly, that sounds like a great experience.

It might actually lead to a relationship though, so there's no way Tinder will make it so easy.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

Oh yeah, it takes out all the humanity put of the dating experience, so that you can just focus on the transactional sex.

And all it costs you is ALL of your privacy

Burn it to the ground

[–] _g_be@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Leads to my favorite punchline/rebuttal combo "do you need the robot to fuck your wife for you too?"

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 weeks ago

Yes, but AI arranged.

[–] Patrikvo@lemmy.zip 11 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

So, AIs are going to be breeding humans. And that brings us one step closer to the Matrix.

[–] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 weeks ago

AI government assigned wife as a default.

People will outsource their thinking, decisions, everything to their AI overlords.

You will have no agency and be happy.

[–] ApplyingAutomation@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] officermike@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Not to detract from graphene, but stock Android can let you manage what specific pictures each app has access to. I don't trust Meta with full access to my gallery, so anytime I have to upload something to Whatsapp, I have to specifically grant permission for that photo to Whatsapp.

[–] kinkles@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 month ago

Same on iOS too

[–] semperverus@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Fun fact, that functionality literally came from GrapheneOS. Google onboarded it from Graphene.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Orrrrrr, you could, and hear me out.....NOT use products from argueably THE biggest invader of privacy of our times. You could just use another messanger.

[–] officermike@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I don't decide what I use for work. My employer does.

[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Your employer owes you a phone if they want you to use software that they specify.

[–] cole 1 points 1 month ago

probably not a realistic take, even if I agree with it.

Whatsapp is so popular that if you're outside of the US the expectation is not weird

[–] WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Your employer is allowed to tell you what apps you have on your personal phone?

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I had a shit employer, I'm normally self-employed but I took a job one winter, they wanted me to download some app called Deputy to like spy on me 24/7. I never did.

[–] Everyday0764@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 weeks ago

yup, my tinder app has access to 6 photos total, scan those if you want

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Android and iOS also have guardrails around this. The OS asks for user consent and the user can grant no access or limited access.

Limited access, which is what you’ll want for a dating app that requires photo sharing, has been in iOS since 2020 (iOS 14). Android has been doing it since 2022 (Android 13).

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Psh, I use GOS without Storage Scopes. I simply only take flattering photographs of my Adonis-like form (they're swiping left anyway, smh)

So when my tinder AI meets and dates another person's AI, openAI will send me the bill for their AI wedding, then when the divorce comes, they'll sue for half of my real life stuff?

Neat.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

pick photos and determine what they're into.

Why not do things the old fashioned way and just ask? Almost like a survey or something.

And not both charge people subscription fees and harvest their data? Gotta think of the money broski.

[–] winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

Cause that way only harvests a small piece of data you willingly submit and could be wrong. Harvesting someone's entire gallery is way more info to use and sell

[–] Tehdastehdas@piefed.social 12 points 4 weeks ago

Owned by Match Group, the same company that destroyed the dating site that matched compatible people too well.

“Destruction of OkCupid as an attack against its liberal-skewed user base"
https://lemmy.world/post/24108120

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is a horrible idea and everyone involved in its conception and implementation should be barred from working in technology ever again.

[–] NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social 5 points 1 month ago

Got it, promotions all around.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago

no I'm good thanks i already put my nuts in there

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Stop using these apps, go outside

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 weeks ago

I do that, but it's not working well enough. I can do both.

[–] shiftymccool@piefed.ca 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (4 children)

First Amazon now Tinder... Who gave them the idea the term "camera roll" is a thing? Nobody "shops their camera roll" or allows "scanning their camera roll". Where the fuck did this shit come from?

EDIT: I'm old enough, by far, to know the origin of the term, i just think it's stupid that companies are suddenly using it in commercials over more common modern terms like gallery

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 weeks ago

Camera roll comes from the fact that cameras used to use a roll of film to take pictures with...

[–] aamram@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 weeks ago

lol... I feel fking old now...

Other commenters have pointed out the terms actual origins, but it got started as a term that was used way back on the original iPhones/devices

https://apple.stackexchange.com/questions/146962/camera-roll-vs-photos-app-what-name-is-correct

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

You just outed yourself as young. It's a holdover from physical film cameras, when film came in a roll. I'm digital, it's just your "photos taken on this device" folder

[–] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

taps_head.jpg can't scan my camera roll if I don't have one.

[–] Charlxmagne@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

"Plans"? A bit late to the fucking party mate, google, fapple, meta/koobface have been doing that shit for years 🤦‍♂️

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Lol, good. The user's of all 'mainstream' social networks, for dating or not, should be fine with that.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Weirdly judgemental of people looking to meet others...

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 weeks ago

I am. Fact.

load more comments
view more: next ›