this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2026
185 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

42174 readers
341 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 1 points 5 hours ago

Did anyone even think about this once while not reading news stories about it?

[–] TwilitSky@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago

Remember when everyone made fun of Second Life? Now the people who made it don't need to feel embarrassed anymore because at least they weren't involved in Metaverse. If you were involved with both, there's no salvation left.

[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 11 hours ago

I think it's hilarious that the entire press and Meta are both like "ope, people don't want to hang out in VR".

furries continue to hang out in VR chat

[–] belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org 4 points 12 hours ago

Slop ai header image to talk about the slop company. Ai use is so embarrassing

[–] drmoodmood@lemmy.ml 10 points 17 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Those lobsters should have top hats and monocles.

[–] TwilitSky@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Not everything has to be so realistic.

[–] SavageCoconut@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It doesn't matter now. All those idiots who wrote books about how good the mataverse was, how it was going to change our lives, how we will be able to talk to costumer support in a virtual office from our house… all those people who wrote about it did the leap to talk about AI and now are writing about how good AI is… goshhhh

can't wait for current AI hype bubble to burst. Not neccesarily have AI stop being relevant, just have it stop being forced into everything.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

We have had Meta headsets for a couple years. Still don’t know what the “metaverse” is. The headsets are fun, though.

[–] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 2 points 18 hours ago

Are they going to rebrand to Slop now to follow the latest trend?

[–] Patrikvo@lemmy.zip 1 points 17 hours ago

The Metaverse cycle:

10 Some article remind me it exist;

20 I shrug and continue not to care about the Metaverse;

30 I forget about the existance of the Metaverse;

40 Some amount of time passes;

50 GOTO 10.

[–] G3NI5Y5@europe.pub 1 points 18 hours ago

No surprise

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They could have cured homelessness 4x over. But instead we got crappy little Zuck-like avatars and an ecosystem nobody ever asked for or wanted.

Fuck this world man.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 hours ago

Yes, but have you considered that you can simply buy a house on the Metaverse?

[–] EatMyPixelDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 17 hours ago

The world is okay, it's billionaires and stupidity that's the problem

[–] kazerniel@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

ahh the schadenfreude... 😈

[–] astraeus@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 day ago

Not only was the entire project thing a completely repulsive, uncanny mess, but also they could’ve just bought roblox for half that amount which is effectively the closest thing to a “metaverse” but ig zuck ego wouldn’t allow that

[–] sakuraba@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

remember 6 years ago when everyone was saying 'learn to code'?

now what?

[–] iamericandre@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

Go to a trade school

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Back to physical hardware, installation, troubleshooting. Been doing that as my focus for years. I'm so busy I turn down work.

[–] sakuraba@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

yeah looks like this is the way now, people are not buying new hardware

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

They are. Just at the Enterprise and business level.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 53 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

motherfuckers could probably have ended hunger in their country for that kind of money.

that's how much of a piece of shit this pedophile nazi is.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 7 points 1 day ago

I think that would end all poverty in the entire world

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 51 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hilarious that this company is now named after a failed product. It would be like if Ford changed it's name to Pinto.

[–] matengor@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

Haha. I will remember that.

[–] NewOldGuard@lemmy.ml 51 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Can’t believe they really rebranded around this shit when we all knew it was a nonsense non-concept five years ago, lmao

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This should be taught in MBA and finance classes for how Bros get caught up in a hype cycle and how it's all bullshit

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 day ago

they don't learn either cause they dove head first into AI right after.

[–] sakuraba@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

well we need to remember they changed their name to meta after zucc went to the senate due to the Cambridge Analytica scandal

[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago
[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 41 points 2 days ago (2 children)

They lose $80B and are still in business? That’s insane.

[–] Thunderbird4@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Not only that, their company is worth over $500B more than it was when they rebranded as Meta. They were valued around $1T at the time and around $1.5T today. So they have completely failed to accomplish anything of value or substance, anything that improves life for anybody, or anything at all related to their entire metaverse concept in that time, and yet the market has deemed that they should continue to skyrocket in value.

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 hours ago

Which is why they do it. Stock markets don't like idle money. For all they wasted here they made it back anyway. They'll do it again with some other bullshit too.

[–] Botzo@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

Gotta pad that balance sheet with losses. Can't be paying taxes if you can write off speculative ventures that just might ~~pay off~~ fund other misadventures.

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

For everyone who never tried it, they had honest to god paid employees in Horizon Worlds to help players get oriented. I cannot imagine a worse job.

The one I ran into was standing in front of some “game” experience that was like…jumping on tiles or some shit.

Wankers. Shut the whole company down

[–] RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Where did the money go? Programmer salaries?

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 12 points 1 day ago (3 children)

That's a very good question. How do you spend $80billion?

Zuckerberg makes Brewster look like an amateur.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Tax write offs. There's no way they spent 80 billion, but they'll claim 80 billion in tax deductions for the "loss"

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But I thought the whole line was “hOrIzOn WoRlDs iSnt the MeTaVeRsE.”

Followed by no explanation of what the metaverse is.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Finally it can be explained: 1) Dig a ditch, 2) Dump in $80B, 3) Light it on fire.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

Buying real estate in the Metaverse used to be compared to buying land on the moon. But Zuck can't turn off the moon, so it's arguably a better investment.

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago

He could have paid you $40B for that advice and still be better off.

[–] crazycraw@crazypeople.online 6 points 2 days ago

ohh bless their hearts.

i love this for them.

load more comments
view more: next ›