PC Gaming

14402 readers

219 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

Be Respectful.
No Spam or Porn.
No Advertising.
No Memes.
No Tech Support.
No questions about buying/building computers.
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca

UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca

KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Developers Were Left in the Dark About DLSS 5 (insider-gaming.com)

submitted 2 weeks ago by inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

This was actually the sub-headline of the article but I thought was the more important party of the article.

Speaking with developers and artists at studios that have agreed to DLSS 5, including CAPCOM and Ubisoft, Insider Gaming was told that the DLSS 5 tech was revealed to them at the same time as everyone else.

“We found out at the same time as the public,” said one Ubisoft developer.

Developers at CAPCOM tell Insider Gaming that the announcement and the publisher’s involvement were particularly shocking, as CAPCOM has previously been historically very “anti-AI” with projects such as Resident Evil Requiem and other unannounced projects in development. Some at the publisher fear that the DLSS 5 announcement could prompt a change in the publisher’s view on generative AI and its implementation in its games.

all 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 38 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

If you have to trick people into using your product you probably shouldn't be making it.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

capitalism

[–] mrfriki@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Late stage capitalism.

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 5 points 2 weeks ago

Doesn't matter, that's always the result

[–] RedSnt@feddit.dk 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Bethesda acted like they were clued in, but that's on par for them.

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago

Bethesda: What is this new feature? What does it do exactly?

NVIDIA: It just works.

Bethesda: Now you're speaking my language.

[–] budakai@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago

What a bone-headed move. I guess we're in the "Benevolent dictator" portion of the AI Boom - Gaming relationship. I feel like we're at such a disconnect now that gamers are looking elsewhere.

Hot take: I think these decisions will drive gamers back to simplicity, community, and y'know...gameplay rather than flash and boom.

It's no surprise that smaller studios are profiting while the big ones are languishing.

Then again people keep buying NHL, NFL, and FIFA 26, so what do I know.

[–] GuyIncognito@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

He should be jensen huanged by the neck if you know what i mean

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Soo, CAPCOM has gone too big to make smart decisions?

[–] C8r9VwDUTeY3ZufQRYvq@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago

The thing I don't understand here is, don't developers have to include support for this in their products? If they don't think it has actual benefit for their game, can't they just ... not? It would seem like nVidia would know this and want to make a product that developers and customers actually want. Am I missing something?