this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
14 points (85.0% liked)

Star Trek Social Club

14378 readers
127 users here now

r/startrek: The Next Generation

Star Trek news and discussion. No slash fic...

Maybe a little slash fic.


Rules

1 Be constructiveAll posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.


2 Be welcomingIt is important that everyone from newbies to OG Trekkers feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.


3 Be truthfulAll posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.


4 Be niceIf a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.


5 SpoilersUtilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episode. There is no formal spoiler protection for episodes/films after they have been available for approximately one week.


6 Keep on-topicAll submissions must be directly about the Star Trek franchise (the shows, movies, books, etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/Quarks.


7 MetaQuestions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.


Upcoming Episodes

Date Episode Title
02-19 SFA 1x07 "Ko’Zeine"
02-26 SFA 1x08 "The Life of the Stars"
03-05 SFA 1x09 "300th Night"
03-12 SFA 1x10 "Rubincon"
TBA SNW 4x01 TBA

In Production

Strange New Worlds (TBA)

Starfleet Academy


In Development

Untitled theatrical film

Untitled comedy series


Wondering where to stream a series? Check here.

Allied Discord Server


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tronn4@lemmy.world 12 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 9 hours ago

Star TReich

[–] xSikes@feddit.online 14 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Big doubt. New owners values is the polar opposite of what Star Trek stands for.

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 9 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I don't even know what Star Trek stands for anymore. It just seems to be slogging on for money, for quite a while now.

Even in the original sense, Gene Roddenberry's high-principled ideals was kind of sabotaged by how he actually conducted himself. That said, a lot of great stories and eps were produced along the way, IMO.

[–] agentTeiko@piefed.social 9 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The problem is is Gene Roddenberry Is not who made star trek what it is. You need DC Fontaine and Gene Coon and for TNG you need Ronald D Moore and Michael Pillar and to some extent Rick Berman for putting the limitations on those writers to drive creativity.

The problem is people don't realize, like with Batman. Bob Kane had a good idea but it was really Bill Finger that really made Batman what we know today.

Just like with Bob, Gene Roddenberry knew how to take credit for others work and create the myth of one man doing it all.

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 5 points 20 hours ago

Agree with all that, but:

The problem is is Gene Roddenberry Is not who made star trek what it is.

He certainly was the one most responsible, though. Yeah, there was a huge issue of him taking credit for other peoples' work, but it was indeed him with the vision, and him constantly perfecting scripts before he turned them over to the production team. Without him there is no Star Trek, period.

Humans are complex, and my read is that he was one of those 'benevolent dictator' types who was useful for a while, before everyone had enough of his shit. Berman was kind of similar from what I understand...

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

That doesn't necessarily mean anything. The owners care more about the news type aspects of these purchases, not the entertainment side.

Look at all the vocal MAGA Trek "fans" that seem to completely ignore the history of the franchise when trying to say it's gone Woke and similar shit. Just because the owners are fascists that doesn't mean the showrunners will be forced to avoid tackling topics indirectly. That's what Trek has always done, sometimes less indirectly than others.

[–] Nobody@anarchist.nexus 12 points 21 hours ago

Shatner and Nichols intentionally butchered every take that didn’t involve them kissing and made television history doing so.

I hope that moving forward Trek keeps that same spirit no matter how oppressive the new corporate regime may be.

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 11 points 22 hours ago

I hope this means "luxury gay space communism team diversity" and not "everyone needs to have a command rank" gets it.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 4 points 20 hours ago

Employee supports continued employment

[–] amgine@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

If I could caricature he’d be fun