Five leadership contestants are in the race to replace former NDP leader Jagmeet Singh: Edmonton Strathcona MP Heather McPherson, labour leader Rob Ashton, activist and documentary filmmaker Avi Lewis, social worker and Campbell River Coun. Tanille Johnston and organic farmer Tony McQuail.

Sanjay Jeram, a political science lecturer at Simon Fraser University, said Ashton, McPherson and Lewis have emerged as the race’s three front-runners.

Lewis has been able to fundraise more than twice as much money as the next candidate, with nearly three times as many people contributing to his campaign.

top 12 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] AGM@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

To me, there's no obvious standout winner. I hope the wisdom of the crowd ends up picking out the one who can both be a great organizer and reconnect with voters broadly. I'm not sure who it is.

[–] ZombieCyborgFromOuterSpace@piefed.ca 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Avi Lewis has a head start on everyone else simply because he speaks French better. The French debate in Montréal was hard to watch but Avi stood out.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wish Alexandre Boulerice was in the race

[–] ZombieCyborgFromOuterSpace@piefed.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Amen.

[–] eezeebee@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

Avi

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago (3 children)

"Lewis has been able to fundraise more than twice as much money as the next candidate, with nearly three times as many people contributing to his campaign."

Although I know this is not true, this statement leads me to think that you can purchase your position. Why should 'how much money you can raise' matter?

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Elections Canada interim campaign returns show Lewis has taken the lead in fundraising, having brought in $1.2 million from more than 10,400 contributors. Elections Canada data shows MacPherson has raised $560,000 from more than 3,800 contributors, while labour leader Rob Ashton has raised nearly $360,000 in contributions from more than 2,000 supporters. McQuail has raised more than $112,000 from over 800 contributors. Elections Canada has yet to publish Johnston’s fundraising numbers.

Lewis' average donation comes to 115$ per donor

McPherson's comes to 147$ per donor

Ashton's is 180$ per donor

Mcquail's is 140$ per donor

So in fact the person who has raised the most, has done it for as smaller average donation per donor. That tells you something about his appeal to the electors.

It's not about more money, it's about more commitment from more people.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You almost had me there until you said "it's not about more money".

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I don't understand where I lost you. What I meant is: what's important here is not the amount of money. If the guy was connected to billionaires, he could have raised all that money from like 3 people. The impressive thing about the Lewis campaign is that because of the lower average donation, the overall amount is an indication of a much broader appeal. So it's not the amount that's impressive, it's the broad appeal of the candidate to the NDP member base. This is compounded by the higher average donation of his opponents, which means that they appeal to fewer, more well-off donors, and still didn't manage to out-fundraise him.

[–] SincerityIsCool@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's correlated with votes. Those that donate to a candidate are almost guaranteed to vote for them. Especially since it's less money on average from more people.

If these are people who signed up to the party due to this campaign, it also shows he can build a movement.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago

I think I get it. It's kind of like polls. A possible indicator of future events happening. Thanks.

[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago

You're looking at someone who not only raised more money, but did so using a larger number of smaller individual donations. Both of these speak highly to the chances of winning a federal election on two fronts:

1: Election campaigns are expensive, and you need to fundraise. If you can fundraiser from a large number of ordinary Canadians you won't be compromised by big corporations

2: If you can convince 3x more people than your opponent to give you money, you can likely convince 3x more people to go out and vote for you. The number of donors strongly correlates with voters because both are a form of political action. They both show a candidate who can mobilise individuals to commit to political action.

Neither of these are "buying an election", because this isn't his money he's using to buy votes, nor is it corporations buying influence that he will have to pay back with preferential treatment.