this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2026
271 points (98.6% liked)

Linux Gaming

24953 readers
73 users here now

Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.

This page can be subscribed to via RSS.

Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.

No memes/shitposts/low-effort posts, please.

Resources

WWW:

Discord:

IRC:

Matrix:

Telegram:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It is also first in the Distrowatch rank

https://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=cachyos

I distro hopped to it from Bazzite a couple of months ago, and I could not be happier.

If you try the installer, be careful when selecting multiples DE/WM as the conflicts were not listed anywhere for the installation process.

Picking a single environment and then adding the others later was what worked for me.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

I've thought about making the switch but what holds me back is stability.

I don't mean stability from a software perspective. But from a distro perspective. Distros come and go all the time. Four or Five have stable enough support through community developers and industry sponsorships that they've managed to become large enough and supported enough to be considered Evergreen Distros for lack of a better word. In other words, distros where the support base is large enough to be considered "too big to fail" (Ubuntu, Mainline Arch, Manjaro, Fedora, Gentoo, etc...)

The rest eventually just fade away. I've always avoided distros that are maintained by a small community of enthusiasts because enthusiasm goes away really quickly once the real work of maintaining a distro rolls around.

I won't pull the trigger on any small community project until I'm reasonably sure I'm not going to have to jump to a new project a year from now when the developers get tired of it and move on to something else.

[–] timestatic@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

I would not consider Manjaro too big to fail considering what they're currently going through. The distro has been stagnating the past few years tbh. The community wants collective ownership but the founder is stalling more time. If you're curious they made a big post about it on their forum

[–] mazzilius_marsti@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

agree. I used to have time to tinker and if things break, I distro hop. Dont have time for that now, I want things to work.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (3 children)

In other words, distros where the support base is large enough to be considered “too big to fail” (Ubuntu, Mainline Arch, Manjaro, Fedora, Gentoo, etc…)

bruh, no Debian?

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Debian's the grand-daddy from which the others all were born.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean , from the ones that are listed, it's only ubuntu, but Debian has spawned A LOT of other distros; and is the literal granddaddy of mint.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

True. But I was meaning more spiritually.

If Ubuntu, Arch, Fedora, Suse, etc... are the Greek Gods, then Debian and Slackware are the mythological Titans that preceded them.

Distros that come after the Greek Gods (Elementary, Manjaro, CachyOS, etc...) are basically the equivalent of every time Zeus or another god would go down to earth to have sex with a mortal and create a demigod (Hercules, Achilles, Aeneaus, etc...)

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

If Ubuntu, Arch, Fedora, Suse, etc… are the Greek Gods, then Debian and Slackware are the mythological Titans that preceded them.

Wow, I did not expect Fedora to be this much of a Johnny come lately. Debian is 93, Fedora 03! Even when you consider Red Hat, which is basically fedora , RH is STILL from 95.

[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago

Asking the real questions.

[–] motruck@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You can switch back to arch pretty easily and also just upgrade from arch. That's the real benefit of cachy is standing on the shoulders of giants like Arch.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Keegen@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

All of the recent gaming focused distros felt this way to me, it's why I'm sticking with good old tried and tested vanilla Fedora with OpenSUSE as my backup option if RedHat ever fucks it up. I don't want a toy to play with but a tool that just works and that I don't have to think about and that's exactly what Fedora is.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] anticurrent@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Me with a stick poking at LinuxMint : hey, wake up, do something, you have piled-up enough money under the bed already

[–] washbasin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

What are you looking for? I just use Mint because it works for my old hardware.

[–] statler_waldorf@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Must...resist...distro...hopping

I've been comfortable on Bazzite for a couple years now but this is giving me the itch.

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Don't worry.

It will simply be a live environment testing.
You will not be curious about the preconfigured openbox and wayfire DE options either.

It will be a small partition to test bare metal.
You will not expand that partition later.

It will be an equal dualboot.
You will not neglect updating your bazzite and feel guilty about it and finally distrohop fully.

[–] statler_waldorf@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I'm old enough to know that's a lie. I gave up dual booting years ago to save us all the embarrassment.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Also, the folks behind this are nice..

CachyOS originated in the Polish Arch community IIRC, but all the discussion I've seen from them is just... cool.

Nothing weird or dramatic like one tends to see in linux projects, just folks really into building this.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 7 points 2 days ago

I think they have a bunch of Arch veterans, right? Like the guy who started it is also some big time Arch maintainer. You can go to archlinux.org and search the repo for packages by maintainer and Peter Jung gives you 100+ results.

[–] AntonioAndolini@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Fedora is pretty good

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I am a CachyOS acolyte. It's my end boss distro.

If you try the installer, be careful when selecting multiples DE/WM as the conflicts were not listed anywhere for the installation process.

Yeah, they do need to clean up the installer a bit. It's also not quite turnkey for a Windows dual-boot.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Blaiz0r@lemmy.ml 27 points 3 days ago (7 children)

What's the difference between this and a fresh install of Arch with a DE like KDE/Gnome?

I've been using Arch for so long now that if I bought a new machine I would find it hard to try anything else.

[–] ada@piefed.blahaj.zone 47 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Arch gives you a bare bones DE, and you have to install/configure everything yourself.

CachyOS gives you a larger volume of default applications in a basic install, and lots of the stuff comes with useful configs out of the box. It also has hardware specific optimisations for multiple generations of CPU in its repos, but how much of a difference that makes in the real world is unclear

[–] Captain_Stupid@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I did some Benchmarks and CachyOS claims of around 15% more performance seem to be true. Unigin Heavenbenchmark , Super Tuxkart and Furmark all got improved scores compared to PopOS. Additionally Fallout 4 now runs a lot smoother which is probably due to the BORE scheduler doing something better. My local LLMs also seem to be slightly faster and for some reason now need less V-Ram.

[–] cyberfae@piefed.social 11 points 3 days ago (13 children)

My local LLMs also seem to be slightly faster and for some reason now need less V-Ram.

This is likely due to zram being setup by default

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] FierroG@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I recently switched to it because I wanted to finally have a good try at wayland with a distro made for it, and wow was I blown away, cachy is the closest I've ever been to a "it just works" OS (including every windows version I've used, from 98 up to 10), just a couple hardware specific issues that I have fixed (except for one). I also really like plasma, I'm mot committed to it but it was nice to come back to it after using mint for a while. I still wouldn't recommend it to a newcomer but damn, it's good.

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My son recently switched to CachyOS after bad experiences with Windows, Bazzite, more Windows, Mint and Zorin. CachyOS was the first time he was happy since losing his love for Windows.

And he doesn't like command lines and configuring stuff, but he says for CachyOS everything was easy and there's tutorials simply telling you what to type, and that works.

He does need to remember that after yay you still need to answer a bunch of questions, because he was wondering why a Discord update didn't work while the update was waiting for his input. There's probably an option somewhere to tell it to always use the default.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hornedfiend@piefed.social 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

JSYK the differences are marginal between a vanilla arch install and cachy. You have you dig really deep to see any difference in performance.

iMO cachy is a good marketing arch distro.

[–] belazor@lemmy.zip 20 points 2 days ago (6 children)

You skipped over the fact that getting vanilla Arch installed is often what trips people up, and also what makes people who run vanilla Arch feel like they accomplished something and truly built something - because they did.

You’re also glossing over the fact that a lot of people run the CachyOS kernel even on vanilla Arch because of the performance gains from having a kernel specifically compiled for instructions your CPU supports.

In other words; I don’t think the convenience of a proper installer, nor even just a 5% gain in performance, is just “marketing”.

Bias disclaimer; I run CachyOS btw

[–] somnuz@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

vanilla arch user here, the installation is a totally different experience but it just gets you into that „go, read / listen and just try to understand what you are doing“ mode.. which, in a long run, is quite helpful. Third year now, still mostly no clue what I am doing most of the time, but plenty of fun has been had in the meantime.

with the direction that Wind(r)ow(n)s took some time ago, I am willing to even write 0s and 1s by hand on a wet toilet paper to just avoid it. Super happy to see CashyOS or SteamOS grow, actually any distro getting popular is a great thing, more users, more knowledge, more problems being pointed out.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] realitaetsverlust@piefed.zip 15 points 2 days ago

While I will most likely never switch from pure arch, I'm very happy that we're getting more and more polished distros for everyday use.

[–] WagnasT@piefed.world 19 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I'm trying a conversion from endeavorOS with CachyOS repositories, it was pretty seamless, I can keep my settings and endeavorOS theming, and allegedly you can switch back at any time. The cachyOS wiki has a short script for converting vanilla arch or endeavorOS to use cachyOS binaries. Been running for about a week and haven't noticed any problems.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Cosmonaut_Collin@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

CachyOS is awesome. I just switched a few months ago after the praises from SomeOrdinaryGamer. I also wanted to use hyprland again after using plasma for sometime. It's amazing that Cachy lets me use the hyprland DE, but also has libraries to let me run kde software without the need for plasma.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (3 children)

It’s amazing that Cachy lets me use the hyprland DE, but also has libraries to let me run kde software without the need for plasma.

Which distribution doesn't allow to run KDE software on non-KDE desktops? How would this even be possible?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Mynameisallen@lemmy.zip 17 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I know this is an unpopular opinion at the moment but I currently think Bazzite is still my favorite for the ROG Ally

[–] mereo@piefed.ca 15 points 3 days ago (3 children)

The RogAlly is not Cachy's objective. It's for regular desktop use.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (3 children)

What does CachyOS have over Bazzite?

[–] definitemaybe@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago (7 children)

The biggest difference, I think, is rolling releases. For gaming, I don't really understand why anyone would prefer slower update cycles since there are frequent updates that fix compatibility or increase performance.

CachyOS is set up to install everything needed for gaming from the main Hello app. Once the Winboat and Gaming one-click installs are run, it just works. I got an itch.io .exe game running by double clicking the .exe. For Steam, I just needed to choose a default Proton compatibility package to use in the app and after that it's been seamless.

CachyOS is apparently "optimized" for gaming performance—I don't pretend to know what that means or how much of an impact it has. I don't really care about eking out a tiny bit more performance, tbh. But I'm super impressed with how well everything just works and (as a bit of a power user) how completely customizable things are, so I can install just about anything I need easily.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

"Frequent updates" sounds to me like "breaks frequently".

I'm using an Intel card, which is still seeing problems fixed with every update. But I've been on the road of bleeding edge before and it's been one messy problem after another.

If I can strike a balance between latest and stable, at the cost of a slightly slower update speed, I'd prefer that.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LostWanderer@fedia.io 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's still an unreal to me, as I remember CachyOS failing to install twice for various reasons. One related to being unable to install the kernel correctly and, the other failing to install the boot loader, leaving me with a dead install. I prefer Bazzite, openSUSE Tumbleweed, Ubuntu for gaming. They seem like nice people, having read the CachyOS forum...But the installer is scuffed AF in my experience.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SolarPunker@slrpnk.net 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I'm also a user, it's arch but more ~~ez~~ intuitive, it also has some popular precomp aur pkg in the repo.

load more comments
view more: next ›