this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2026
340 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

82518 readers
4011 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In a sensational turn of events in the fight against Chat Control, a majority in the European Parliament voted today to end the untargeted mass scanning of private communications. In doing so, the Parliament firmly rejected the error-prone and unconstitutional surveillance practices of recent years. Pressure is now mounting on EU governments to respect the MEPs’ vote and bury untargeted mass surveillance in Europe once and for all.

top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 41 minutes ago

I wonder what all these anti-EU russian propaganda bots are going to use now to sow discontent against the EU... lol

[–] greenbit@lemmy.zip 1 points 24 minutes ago

Europe has pressure to shift the narrative from all systems and institutes have been a part of the parasite class goals, to these concessions. "Noo don't collapse us, we are less rigged". But rigged is still rigged

[–] Vinylraupe@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 hours ago

Why is it possible to vote for something that is against the constitution?

[–] Antaeus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Great news!

[–] Drew1718@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Doesn't mean anything yet. Parliament can get overruled by the Council, whom seem more in favor of untargeted scanning.

[–] richardwallass@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

The commission always got the last word

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 28 points 8 hours ago

Finally some good fucking news. Now let's make it so there's no 2.0 3.0 etc constantly trying to sneak this in - we need to enshrine privacy into real laws.

[–] Imaginary_Stand4909@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Yay for the EU! Hopefully you guys get a law that will permanently enshrine your privacy rights (or rights to encrypted chats at least).

[–] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 40 minutes ago

There is no such thing as permanent laws. And for good reasons.

[–] jeffep@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

GDPR already exists, but there is no such thing as permanence in politics. Constant struggle

[–] lb_o@lemmy.world 15 points 9 hours ago

Good News! I was so afraid for our future in Europe.

Losing freedoms in our modern times will lead to just another authoritarian state, which will eventually lead to shit.

[–] ISOmorph@feddit.org 15 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

In doing so, the Parliament firmly rejected the error-prone and unconstitutional surveillance practices of recent years.

Good news. However shouldn't that also include online age verification?

[–] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 39 minutes ago

No, those things can be done in a completely private way.

[–] bonenode@piefed.social 80 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Once and for all... until the next vote?

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 40 points 14 hours ago

Everything is temporary.

Political participation is a full-time job, keep the pressure on and the change will endure.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 33 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Awesome

Can we now put that in some form of European constitution, pretty please with a cherry?

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 2 points 4 hours ago

Or we put it on a timer and let it bubble up in some months to reevaluate it over and over again. Wouldn't that be fun?

🫩

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 62 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

What is this? Good news? In this economy? It simply cannot be!

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 4 points 4 hours ago

This is democracy manifest!

[–] Broadfern@lemmy.world 34 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Yay Europe! Genuinely happy for you folks.

Maybe someday we’ll have freedom and privacy in the US :’)

[–] timwa@lemmy.snowgoons.ro 4 points 7 hours ago

It's definitely starting to feel like having your rights enshrined on unalterable tablets of stone, but which must be re-interpreted by a half dozen political appointees holding a seance with the founding fathers every few months, may not be the platonic ideal of governance that Americans are constantly telling the world it is.

[–] thorhop@sopuli.xyz 8 points 10 hours ago

Halt! You have gone below the mandatory threshold for nationally mandated jingoism. An ICE unit has been dispatched to your location to bring you to the RFK Right-To-Labour camp.

The beating will continue until moral improves.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 16 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

Shit, I've heard so much gear mongoring about this for so long. Also on here.

The EU's stance have never been anything other than no chat control. All everyone else have pointed out are proposals not even reaching the votes, or got voted down.

I get that you are afraid that the EU would do it anyway and pass the proposals. But they never did, and even if it got voted for today, it's not even final and needs to go to the council who is openly against it.

But so nice that this is FINALLY put down.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Says the guy overlooking the other trojan horse of age controls being brought inside the walls. Your analysis is not so good.

[–] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 33 minutes ago (1 children)

That "trojan horse" is nothing but a paper tiger since age control will be managed in a completely privacy-friendly way. It is a non-issue. So that is why it is being "overlooked"

The check will send nothing more than a yes/no verification, and no other forms of identification.

And the information will be managed by a governmental institute that already has all that information.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 1 points 26 minutes ago

Jesus christ, you are a mark for some con artist with your naivety, no offense bro. Ha.

[–] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 19 points 13 hours ago

It's always better to be worried for nothing than not worried for something you didn't pay enough attention to. Even if something fascist has no chance of passing, you should still resist it as loudly and as aggressively as possible, every single time.

[–] MousePotatoDoesStuff@lemmy.world 10 points 14 hours ago

Glad to know. I'd rather be overly cautious than overly careless about privacy, tho (looks across the Atlantic)

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

A lot of lemmings really hate the idea of democracy actually working somewhere in the world.

[–] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 32 minutes ago

Yeah, tankies can't handle it.

[–] Jiral@lemmy.org 12 points 14 hours ago

The war over civil rights is continuing, no questions but this has been an important vote against the surveillance state ambitions.

[–] testaccount372920@piefed.zip 10 points 15 hours ago

Hell yeah! Great to hear that

[–] Attacker94@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Maybe I'm misreading, but it seems like this only applies in the context of sex crimes. I see no reason based upon the wording that they couldn't do it for other things even with this in place