this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2026
9 points (73.7% liked)

Showerthoughts

41049 readers
778 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Thinking about how on poly market of setting up bets on nuclear war, or nuclear exchange. If you think it won't happen you bet no, but if you yes and win then most likely the venue will get destroyed and you won't get your payout or money you get will be worthless... Guess that adds another layer of betting. Assuming guarantee money would be worthless it would effectively mean losing.

Despite the inherent parley, seems like the person setting up the bet wanted to get the money of the people that bet on nuclear war happening

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] illi@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Is there nuclear Armageddon? Congrats, you win. But since we are likely dead and money is likely worthless anyway so you win nothing.

There isn't one? Well there could be one tomorrow! Keep the bets going folks!

The only person who wins this one is the one taking the bets.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Plot twist:

People are betting it happens so the corrupt assholes will prevent nuclear war so they can win the long odds that it won't happen.

Welcome to America.

[–] Cattail@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah that's gotta work at least with a few staffers

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you don't want it to happen, you bet "yes". You bet "yes" as hard as you can, so that the only way the insiders can make any money is by betting against the "yes" consensus, and refusing to blow up the world.

It's a bribe/protection racket with extra steps.

[–] Cattail@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm actually wondering how payouts for poly market works I'd assume it would be proportional to how much you bet versus everyone else. Probably whole range.

But that is interesting that you could influence decisions and even bribe with poly markets. If you make another outcome more of a payout then it should motivate someone to make it happen like with the dildo thrown at the wmba

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

I’m actually wondering how payouts for poly market works I’d assume it would be proportional to how much you bet versus everyone else. Probably whole range.

https://docs.polymarket.com/concepts/positions-tokens

When someone starts an event, there are initially no shares to be had. You can pay $1 and buy both a "yes" share and a "no" share from Polymarket. This is called "splitting". You're splitting your money into shares on both sides of the event.

Presumably, you want something more than breaking even. So, you keep the side of the bet that you want, and you offer to sell the other side of that bet.

You could offer your "no" shares for $0.25 each. Someone can give you $25 for them. Now you have 100 "yes" shares that will be worth $100 or $0 in the future, and $25 cash. You could offer your "yes" shares for $0.80 each. Someone else might buy them from you at that price, giving you $80. You are now out of the market, with a total of $105 back. This is "trading".

After a hard day of trading back and forth, you find yourself with good positions on both sides of the bet. You have 200 "yes" shares that you paid $80 for, and 100 "no" shares that you also paid $40 for. You can take 100 yes shares and 100 no shares, join them together, and sell them back to Polymarket for $100. This is called "merging".

Finally, you can wait until the event occurs. Let's say the outcome was "yes". Your 100 "yes" shares are now worth $1 each, and can now be traded at that price. This is called "redeeming".