this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
7 points (66.7% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1746 readers
115 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YPTB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Cross posted here as suggested in the comments. It was highlighted that the individual is a lead Lemmy developer, raising serious concerns about the direction of Lemmy, a leading Fediverse platform, and the impact on future user adoption.

Hi

There have been some rather concerning actions taken by an admin of the !privacy@lemmy.ml community, dessalines@lemmy.ml. Based on recent moderation decisions and a complete lack of communication, it seems like their account may have been compromised, or even more concerning if these actions are deliberate.

  1. Erroneous Rule 4 Enforcement, First Instance: a guide posted to !privacy@lemmy.ml, despite receiving many positive votes and comments, was removed under Rule 4:

If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered

However, this post was a guide and not a question, so Rule 4 does not apply. Attempts were made to reach out for clarification but there has been no response, despite their account showing recent activity.

  1. Erroneous Rule 4 Enforcement, Second Instance: an on-topic informational video also posted to !privacy@lemmy.ml, despite also receiving many positive votes, was again removed under Rule 4. This post was again not asking a question, so again Rule 4 does not apply. Again, no explanation has been given.

  2. User Bans in Completely Unrelated Communities: user bans of over a month have been applied for not only !privacy@lemmy.ml but several completely unrelated communities:

This is especially concerning given that the above posts have no relation to these communities, and no recent activity has been made in any of them, meaning none of their rules could have been broken. Moreover, a public track record of positive contributions across Lemmy has been established, with many positive votes and comments received over a sustained period. Given all of this, the bans appear to be highly disproportionate, only adding to the growing concerns around moderation practices.

  1. Repost with Disclaimer Removed: a repost of the guide, despite a disclaimer explaining the original removal appears to be in error and that attempts to contact the admin have failed, despite again receiving many positive votes and constructive comments, was once again removed. Again, no explanation has been given.

Given all of this, it’s hard to avoid the conclusion that something is not right. Mistakes in moderation happen but the complete lack of communication, the disproportionate actions, and the ongoing bans from unrelated communities raise serious concerns. It seems as though the account is most likely compromised, or even more concerning if these actions are deliberate.

Has anyone else experienced similar issues with this admin, or does anyone have more insight into what might be happening?

TL;DR: Admin dessalines@lemmy.ml of !privacy@lemmy.ml appears to be making seriously concerning moderation decisions, including erroneous enforcement of Rule 4 in at least two separate instances, failing to respond to messages, and applying user bans in completely unrelated communities despite a long track record of positive contributions across Lemmy. This has led to speculation that their account is likely compromised, or even more concerning if these actions are deliberate.

Any thoughts or similar experiences would be appreciated.

Cross post with https://lemmy.world/post/43978041

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Thanks for adding this. I encourage others to see comments on the linked post first.

[–] punkisundead@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 week ago

Very high effort for a shitpost

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

What's the name of the post and what did it link to? "Informational video" screams YouTube.

Rule 4 might be referencing their site wide rule against spam and ads.

[–] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

The first was a guide on how to respond to the term "sideloading" and the second was a video about the rise of facial recognition in supermarkets. The link provided was to a YouTube video titled "What You Don't Know About SAINSBURY'S and the AI BIOMETRIC PANOPTICON", although it was not clear that YouTube was referenced in the rules. The post above mentions that attempts were made to contact the admin for clarification but no response has been received.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

This is just an annoying op at this point.

[–] Wren@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If I was an admin I'd rather work on the platform than deal with this OP, too.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

It was funny the first time because OP was naive.

The second time gets a pass because OP was just being an idiot.

And now they're still at it.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 week ago

Which post attacking the lemmy devs isn't? Either just annoying spam or malicious actors

[–] autonomoususer@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

A cross post to this community was requested in the comments.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You've been spamming it relentlessly for days.

[–] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Cross posts have been made no more than once to only few relevant communities, either as relevance was realised or at the request of other users. A clear explanation has been included at the top of each post. It’s not spamming, just sharing where it’s relevant.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So you are done after this then? You wont post it again?

[–] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Unlikely, unless you or other users find or request that this be cross post to another relevant community.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You didn't address my question directly. Only you've been spamming this.

[–] autonomoususer@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This has already been addressed.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

You not understanding that you are spamming isn't the issue having been addressed.

[–] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 3 points 1 week ago

well, that's just .ml for you.

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

its an .ml account. the original devs are hardcore tankies.

None of this is surprising. I doubt their account was taken over. Need to fork Lemmy away from these devs

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For all of their faults they are also pretty hard core on keeping this thing open source. No need to fork it.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 week ago

No need to fork it.

Those saying it usually just don't want to be associated with communists.

[–] Wren@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago

You could join piefed (though I don't recommend it,) a platform made possible because the original devs made this open source.

[–] Wren@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is a lot of words to avoid saying what was actually posted.

What was the post? Who were the users erroneously banned? I don't think this even fits the post criteria here.

[–] autonomoususer@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

It’s mentioned below. This post appears to align with this community’s rules but I see there are additional guidelines. I may make a few more changes to ensure it fits, though I’m cautious not to deviate too far from the original source of this cross post.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wasn't this exact thing posted the other day?

[–] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yes, a cross post to this community was requested in the comments, as shown at the top and bottom of this cross post.

[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 1 week ago

Someone should call the police and ask for a welfare check on Dessalines