this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
50 points (96.3% liked)

World News

54624 readers
2753 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Random thought: If there's a breakthrough in life-prolonging medication in the next decades (i.e. you live to 120 instead of 80), that would mean that world population would go up by 1.5x simply due to that, so if there's no prior drop in numbers, that might not be sustainable.

[–] Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes but there won't be medication you're talking about.

And if there was they wouldn't ever give it to regular civilians.

And if there was they wouldn’t ever give it to regular civilians.

takes 20 years for patents to expire and cheap generica to become available

[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Okay, good. We should have less humans in the world.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

I've always wondered why are comments about overpopulation downvoted on Lemmy when that is objectively, scientifically a real problem. Last I checked, earth can handle around 3-4 billion people under our consumption model. The earth is dying.

I do believe that once problems that commonly at the core occur from overpopulation (ie. rise in cost of living, housing crisis, water problems, etc.) the humans will simply not feel like making kids, so this is self-correcting problem, but still very damaging.

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Feel free to volunteer for sterilization

[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

Already done :3

[–] Havatra@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Unsure about the "need", but with current systems, less people would be beneficial in a multitude of ways, indeed, as long as it's a somewhat controlled reduction. The first thing to suffer is the business model based on infinite expansion, which if they follow other countries' trend, they will start to cry about to the government pretty soon, demanding efforts into increased reproduction. (Like Japan making alcohol cheaper for youth, and China making condoms more expensive.)

[–] hammertime@lemmy.org -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] clot27@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Nope, from 3.5 to 1.9 in 2 decades