this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
348 points (99.7% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

8021 readers
269 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CPMSP@midwest.social 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Oh man, I timed that Molly perfectly

[–] sepi@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago

It's not a war, it's a Country Building Operation. Tehran in 3 days!

[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Department of War was its original name. I've always thought it to be a more honest name than the Department of Defence.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't know if this makes it better or worse but it never stopped being the "Department of Defense."

The "Department Of War" is essentially stylistic preference in the executive branch. The "Defense" name is still the statutory one.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

EDIT: See below; this is invalid.


I'll add that I – giving Mike Johnson the least benefit of the doubt I could – tried pretty hard to find any instance of him referring to the DoD as the "Department of War" following Trump's executive order; I could not.

[–] rainwall@piefed.social 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

He corrected himself a few days ago in a back and forth about iran after he called if department of defense and called it the department of war.

Here he is 3 days ago:

"We are not at war. We have no intention of being at war," he told reporters. "The Department of War has made it very clear -- this is a limited operation. It's an operation that is limited in its scope and duration."

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh shit, that's why I didn't find it. Here's the C-SPAN clip. He says "Department of Defense" and then immediately corrects himself to "Department of War". Jesus christ, Mikey, I really tried.

(This was somewhat difficult to find even with the quote; please link a source if you use one in the future instead of just quoting.)

[–] rainwall@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

I couldnt find the source that listed the slip either, I just recall reading an article that listed the slip days back so i knew the context.

oh whew thank you i was worried he was doing the right thing

dammit don't make me give him a single iota of respect because that's something that'll do it

[–] ferrule@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We've now hit the point in the timeline where these morons thought maybe if we change the name back no one will think it was us.

"What? No, we are the Department of DEFENSE. That whole thing going on in the Middle East was caused by the Department of War. That's not us."

[–] bonenode@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago
Reg: Listen, the only people we hate more than the Romans are the fucking Judean People's Front.
Judith, Stan, Francis: [Murmurs of agreement and "splitters"]
Francis: And the Judean Popular People's Front.
Reg, Judith, Stan: [More enthusiastic agreements]
Stan: And the People's Front of Judea!
Reg: [Agreements stop suddenly] What?
Stan: The People's Front of Judea, splitters!
Reg: We're the People's Front of Judea!
Stan: Oh! I thought we were the Popular Front.
Reg: People's Front!
Francis: Whatever happened to the Popular Front, eh?
Reg: [Indicating a man sitting by himself] He's over there.
Reg, Judith, Stan, Francis: [Beat] Splitter!

The Trump admin learning why the euphemism was used in real time

Department of Face-Eating Leopards, on the other hand, is doing great

[–] Ghostie@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Sure. Limited operation. But they aren’t taking the draft off the table.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It is a really high limit.

[–] Ghostie@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

“This is a limited operation. We aren’t sure where that limit is, but it’s probably somewhere.”

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Oops, forgot who he was speaking with and got the wires crossed.

Soon the GOP might have to set up a clubhouse and private Facebook group so they don't leak their real feelings.