this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2026
1239 points (99.5% liked)

memes

20990 readers
994 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world 90 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Make Elon Musk sit atop one of his shitty rockets the next time it launches.

[–] jaschen306@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 month ago

I prefer he sits at the bottom better.

[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

SpaceX rockets are all but shitty, but you can claim it's despite Musk's involvement. Since it's been known he fires all the capable engineers who disagree with him.

[–] 18107@aussie.zone 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I heard there was a person hired specifically to keep Elon away from the critical areas so he doesn't try to overrule a decision and destroy the company.

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Probably give him a few easy to spot ‘problems’ to overrule, so that he doesn't meddle with the important things.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

In fairness, the Falcon 9 / Dragon capsule systems are solid and reliable, with good track records.

So its not literally all SpaceX stuff.

But... yeah, the Starship/HeavyBooster is what happens when Elon is in charge, utter shit show.

And also, the Falcon 9 family never actually got close to the cost reductions Elon initially said would be delivered by the re-usability paradigm.

It would have to be roughly an order of magnitude less expensive, for a ton to orbit, than what it currently is, to match what he said it would achieve.

as 18107 says, yeah, at various Musk companies, their have been people whose main job was primarily to distract him from getting involved very directly, but this has apparently stopped being a thing.

Just go find the conversation he had with some of the high ups on the Twitter team, when he took it over.

He just knows buzzwords, beyond that, probably most of the people in this thread are more intelligent than he is, on literally any subject... he has no idea how anything works beyond a very big picture / conceptual level.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] you_are_dust@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Making CEOs use their product live is a great idea. It'll never happen because it's a great idea.

[–] Patrikvo@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago

Would be interesting for the CEOs of businesses that make BDSM products.

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Tell that to the McDonald’s CEObot

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bieren@lemmy.today 33 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Make the servicenow ceo search for something in their product. Anything. Not even in a case. Just use the product.

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 month ago

Service-Now CEO would be the middle piece in my human centipede

[–] big_slap@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

sorry, but he's too busy trying to figure out where else to shove ai

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NullPointerException@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I don’t know. Between him and the CEO of Atlassian, I think the last will have more trouble. But… why not both?

[–] CTDummy@piefed.social 42 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (7 children)

Bro why is Atlassian actually so shit? Two of their open facing tickets I came across last night. One for them to fix table rendering in the description field of tickets and the other to enable the option for collapsable fields in Confluence to be expanded by default.

Both were the better portion of a decade old and both with 1-2 year old updates saying “sorry we’ve taken so long to provide an update on this request”. The confluence one was closed without word and move to another ticket, reducing the votes/views and therefore dev priority. Such basic functionality left unaddressed for a decade. Bizzare-o world with some of these tech companies I swear.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

collapsible fields doesn't improve shareholder value

[–] CTDummy@piefed.social 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah and it doesn’t help when the new (as of ~2 years ago) dev ops leads is an “AI first” type. I get all that but like 4 years in, tell us to get fucked “your fields are remaining forever collapsed”. 8 god damn years the initial confluence ticket was open.

I came across it while setting up a wiki page last night, there were people who had been monitoring it for years. Some real “abandon hope all ye who enter” type shit.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago

Who needs to find tickets when you have Rovo!

Wait, you’re saying you do not log in just to use it? What’s wrong with you, the shareholders specifically requested it. They’re never wrong.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

Every time they add the feature, half of the product breaks. The other half start using twice as much memory and compute, somehow.

They've got a pile of technical debt disguised as a product and the development velocity of the snail as a consequence. Very typical. The real question is "why hasn't the competition eaten their lunch already".

[–] VonReposti@feddit.dk 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sorry, best we can do is rename tasks to work items.

[–] CTDummy@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago

sigh With a license fee increment as well, I suppose.

[–] okwhateverdude@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Atlassian is on the chopping block with the robots getting as good as they are at writing code. It wouldn't surprise me if we'll start seeing self-hosted clones that actually work and drop all of the shit complexity that most people don't use but Atlassian built to land specific customers. So much fucking bloat in software and core features being changed or ignored is due explicitly to this. The larger customers (by ARR) dictate the bounds of the product even if they are a tiny fraction of the actual user base. At work we're already throwing away a shitty case management system that exists purely to employ people like the little kids at the front of the train in Snowpiercer. We'll save 6-7 figures in annual licensing, and the team of specialists hired to work in this shitty system are already being migrated to other work. The Saaspocalypse is totally gonna be a thing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I was about to say that as bad as Outlook was, I actually used its search to figure out some Jira ticket because just... damn trying to find a Jira ticket based on a few keywords is just a pain in the ass...

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 month ago

Here’s a 12 year old bug asking them to stop corrupting user entered comments by turning them into cutesy emoji.

https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/JRACLOUD-39164

They DGAF about actual users.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago
[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

wouldn't they just ask Copilot?

and trust whatever it says

[–] UnrepententProcrastinator@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Honestly copilot search of emails is definitely a step up to the outlook search... Which doesn't say much...

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That's the plan. They have so much put into copilot and no one is willing to use it. I wouldn't be surprised if they fucked over search to make it happen, but outlook search has always been an unusable POS

[–] Patrikvo@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That's easy, you start in the first folder, look at each email until you find the one you need. If you reach the bottom and haven't found the mail, move to the next folder and repeat.

For most that shouldn't take more than 3 to 5 workdays.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Greg@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 month ago

WeAreDevelopers conference 2025, CEO of GitHub was vibe coding for the last time as a CEO of GitHub.

[–] runching@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I have an excel VBA macro that can find emails that outlook says don't exist

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

I don't know what the hell happened to outlook's search function with the update to 11, but I'm convinced it was actual sabotage.

Outlook insists that no one has ever sent me anything. If I search for an email from a specific person, that person doesn't exist. Unless sometimes they do. The first three letters of their last name, out of order? Fine, can find them no problem unless you're looking for when they sent you an attachment. Then no.

Copy and pasting their name in to the search bar? Who the fuck you talking about guy??

Looking for an email that has "and" in the subject line?

Here's every email you have with the letter A in it. Hope this helps! By the way have you tried CLAUDE?!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Supercrunchy@programming.dev 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Life pro tip that will make your IT deparment hate you: you can use Evolution and change the client id to match outlook's one in the advanced settings. It'll look like you are using the standard outlook client from your IT department point of view, but you'll actually get a usable interface instead. I assume that thunderbird has the same options to override the client id, but I haven't checked.

Don't blame me if you get in troubles though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Surely he has 3 assistants for that.

[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Do it while being asked by a middle manager if you saw the email last week. Fucking story of my life.

[–] RunJun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Outlook search has gotten way worse in the past year + 🤬

[–] lemming741@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

It's still bad, but you can save an ounce of sanity by keeping a copy of everything locally.

https://businesstechplanet.com/outlook-only-displaying-emails-newer-than-12-months-how-to-fix/

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Next can we get a super cut of the CEO using teams to connect to a few different meetings? Sure it might be fine a couple times in a row but that software is such dogshit in general.

[–] foggianism@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

And them make him create a new Minecraft account

[–] how_we_burned@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago

Not only that but make him eat a McDonald's hamburger

[–] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

Me: what rule moved that email to a random folder? Outlook: who the fuck knows?

[–] Zanathos@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Holy shit this is brilliant. I find much better results searching our archive solution for a term than whatever Outlook returns for me.

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 5 points 1 month ago

This might be better than the Guillotine

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 3 points 1 month ago

I only ever used it in the past because it was at work and that was the only allowed option.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago

With AI they might be able to figure out how to sort by date for search and by conversation for viewing. Microslop's search function sucks so much.

[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

They would refuse. It's all fake news!!!

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

It'll be his secretary putting a ticket in

load more comments
view more: next ›