this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2026
74 points (97.4% liked)

politics

29801 readers
1589 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump’s private comments have not focused on a large-scale ground invasion of Iran, but rather on the idea of a small contingent of U.S. troops that would be used for specific strategic purposes, sources say.

Donald Trump has privately expressed serious interest in deploying U.S. troops on the ground inside of Iran, according to two U.S. officials, a former U.S. official and another person with knowledge of the conversations.

Trump has discussed the idea of deploying ground troops with aides and Republican officials outside the White House while outlining his vision for a post-war Iran in which Iran’s uranium is secure and the U.S. and a new Iranian regime cooperate on oil production similar to how the U.S. and Venezuela are, the sources said.

The president’s comments expressing serious interest in deploying ground troops have not focused on a large-scale ground invasion of Iran, but rather on the idea of a small contingent of U.S. troops that would be used for specific strategic purposes, the U.S. officials, the former U.S. official and the person with knowledge of the discussions said. They said Trump has not made any decisions or given any orders related to ground troops.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

They're already being told to mobilize. Service members being called up all over the place. Under reported news. Might be a bluff, but I doubt it because it's so fucking stupid, which tracks with this admin.

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Trump is taking Putin's approach to Ukraine for his approach to Iran. He's going to force as many soldiers into the meat grinder as possible in hopes that it jams.

Save this comment somewhere: Trump will bring back the draft and expand who falls under it as the war fails harder.

People seem to forget the talks by Republicans under Biden about bringing back the draft. They didn't forget those talks but the American people sure AF did in 2024. Now its just around the corner.

[–] Akh@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

So have several democrats who took AIPAC money

[–] MyOpinion@lemmy.today 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Just as long as it is MAGAt sons and daughters I am sure it will be fine.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

They’re all pre-diabetic living on Mt Dew and Burgers. Wearing their MAGA hats talking tough while the kids actually hoping to better themselves with a GI bill get killed.

[–] tartarin@reddthat.com 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Deployment of troops on the ground is inevitable. Air space control cannot achieve anything, at some point you need troops on the ground otherwise everything is for nothing.

[–] Corngood@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago

Doubling the price of Russia's oil, and using up all the patriot missiles is nothing to you?

[–] ebolapie@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

where's that guy who told me Iran doesn't stand a chance and I'm stupid for saying we lose even if we win

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Then let him take the pole position, like any good leader would do!