this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2026
15 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

53437 readers
882 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Jerb322@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

I was just thinking about that torpedo strike on a old ass ship with no ammunition. Good thing it's at the bottom of the ocean, spilling all of it's fuel and oil.

Maybe military industrial complex will soon give him a gringy "clean war" award.

[โ€“] helix@feddit.org 7 points 9 hours ago

wars*, he's fighting multiple fronts and supplying multiple sides with weapons.

[โ€“] fossilesque@mander.xyz 3 points 9 hours ago
[โ€“] Melobol@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think a war has bigger footprint than all the backrolled environmental protection laws, and pushing coal and big oil does...
Because those effects will be felt over the - naively hopeful wishful thinking of those wars being over in the close future. Right?

[โ€“] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Pushing up the price of oil and stopping production could actually be carbon negative.

[โ€“] harmbugler@piefed.social 1 points 6 hours ago

Maybe the fastest way to stop this war is to note that there are positive environmental outcomes.