Asklemmy

53437 readers

840 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

Is there an estimate of the carbon footprint of Trump's war? (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 12 hours ago by xiao@sh.itjust.works to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Melobol@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think a war has bigger footprint than all the backrolled environmental protection laws, and pushing coal and big oil does...
Because those effects will be felt over the - naively hopeful wishful thinking of those wars being over in the close future. Right?

[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Pushing up the price of oil and stopping production could actually be carbon negative.

[–] harmbugler@piefed.social 1 points 7 hours ago

Maybe the fastest way to stop this war is to note that there are positive environmental outcomes.