These cancer platforms need to be shutdown...
Global News
What is global news?
Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.
Post guidelines
Title format
Post title should mirror the news source title.
URL format
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Country prefix
Country prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) where title is not clear enough from which country the news is coming from.
Rules
This community is moderated in accordance with the principles outlined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which emphasizes the right to freedom of opinion and expression. In addition to this foundational principle, we have some additional rules to ensure a respectful and constructive environment for all users.
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media posts
Avoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation. Any kind of discrimination is will not be tolerated.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
- !legalnews@lemmy.zip - International and local legal news.
- !technology@lemmy.zip - Technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
- !interestingshare@lemmy.zip - Fascinating articles, captivating images, satisfying videos, interesting projects, stunning research and more.
- !europe@lemmy.dbzer0.com - News and information about Europe.
- !usa@midwest.social - News and information about United States of America.
Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.
If you're betting on Polymarket and you're not an insider, you'll lose in the long run.
Doesn't game theory suggest you should always bet that we're not going to all die?
It just adds another complexity to the bet that there has to be enough apathy of that happening to an Arab country.
800k could buy a lot of hard drugs, and those underground bunkers might last a few weeks
The betting market on war is just an auction for bombing things.
And it sounds be treated as such.
Good then trump can't use it to bet on himself to press the button.
Can someone ELI5 how is it a real problem?
Like, Bezos and other corpos will bet on Polymarket and then ~~bribe~~ lobby Trump to nuke Iran for profit? Is this the plot we are afraid of? If so Polymarket is not the problem here.
Edit: to be clear, Polymarket is cancer, but I’m confused how this particular case different from any other
There's a reason that betting on the death of people is illegal - it provides a way to finance a hitjob on someone indirectly. In fact, betting against their death provides the funds that would entice someone to take it into their own hands.
This is the same thing but on a much bigger scale.
For one, its not gambling if there is not an element of chance. Gambling is only the case where people dont know who will win the Super Bowl, or whether or not you will draw a blackjack at the casino, etc.
If people have direct control over the event being bet on, to the extent that it is not affected by any element of chance, then its not gambling. Its just people with control over a given situation rigging a game to take money from other people. If you went to the casino and the roulette dealer could bet on the game and control where the ball landed that wouldnt be gambling. Neither are prediction markets in most cases.
That doesnt even get into the issues with ethics and incentivizing people in control to do terrible things (or otherwise act amorally or irrationally) just to make money in the prediction market
Is this a problem of the game i.e. being able to bet on anything (someone’s decision) or problem of someone having insider knowledge/influence on decision and allowed to play? In your casino example it’s dealer who is banned, not the roulette itself.
For example insider trading is regulated, following Polymarket’s takedown logic we should ban all trading.
In other words, would this bet be a problem if decision makers were banned from betting or profiting on it?
for example, insider trading is regulated
lol, sure it is. stock market is the biggest casino around, and there are a dozen different ways to extract "liquidity"
just like the stock market, actually enforcing the rules takes a sbmhitload of overhead and with enough influence even those aspects of the casino (SEC/FINRA/Fed) got compromised or neutered in no time at all.

The human race might end if we had a nuclear war, but at least I made some money
Yeah something tells me its still going to do immoral shit. Especially the after backlash bit. Thats a problem.
Well now that I can't make money on Polymarket, I have no reason to start a nuclear war anymore. The world is saved.
"WE WILL ALL GO TOGETHER WHEN WE GO!" - Tom Lehrer, Satirist and Harvard Mathematician(1928-2025).