this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
254 points (99.6% liked)

Memes

55263 readers
644 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

we have always been at war with east asia ...

[–] AnarchoBolshevik@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 4 weeks ago

we have always been at war

[–] rozodru@piefed.world 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

well to be fair the previous two times at least they came up with some kind of excuse for it. this time? nadda.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Does that honestly make a difference to you people?

"This time they didn't lie to me, and that's worse!"

[–] shane@feddit.nl 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

It shows the evolution of the empire.

At some point the need for casus belli disappears and then the wars of pure domination begin.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 weeks ago

They built ~80 cop cities in preparation for any potential civil discontent as they dismantle worker rights and wage indefensible wars of choice.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean, regardless of your opinion of the geopolitics, the first Gulf War was clearly defined and well executed

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 1 points 4 weeks ago

And?

“This thing was done well” is a pointless statement on its own.

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

yes, manufactured consent/propaganda in general is a delicate thing.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Why within 30 seconds have two users replied to a 1 day old comment, in an inactive thread.

[–] Manmoth@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 weeks ago

It's the geopolitical equivalent of "at least take me out to dinner first"

[–] cornishon@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 month ago

People have already deeply internalized the excuses, they don't need to repeat them.

[–] Sickos@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

2001

I believe we didn't invade Iraq until 2003.

Although, curiously enough, Iran helped us do it.

Doubly ironic, given that Bush Sr was so instrumental in beefing up the Iraqi military ten years before the '91 invasion... for the purpose of invading its neighbors. (https://archive.is/HwX3A)

What is it about hardline reactionary Islamic governments getting baited by American neoconservatives to spin around, show us their backs, and point to the spot a knife would sink in most deeply?

[–] QinShiHuangsShlong@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago

I believe we didn’t invade Iraq until 2003.

I think they meant Afghanistan in 2001.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

Correct. Maybe OM[^1] is too young to remember.

[^1]: Original Memer

[–] v_krishna@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

Fuck this is my exact age. Too close to home.

[–] RedSnt@feddit.dk 3 points 1 month ago

It's "funny" I was just watching the Rorschach "do it!" clip earlier. That's how I'm starting to feel.