this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
67 points (94.7% liked)

Linux

16496 readers
156 users here now

Welcome to c/linux!

Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!

Rules:

  1. Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.

  2. Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.

  3. Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.

  4. No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.

  5. No NSFW adult content

  6. Follow general lemmy guidelines.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Heyla@quokk.au 3 points 4 hours ago

We are TIRED TO BE ALL RHE WORLD ALWAYS HARRASSED BY USA 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 2 points 9 hours ago

We have no control over our government

[–] vathecka@lemmy.radio 8 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Unenforceable and lacking jurisdiction.

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 7 hours ago

It being unenforceable is part of the ploy. It means moneyful entities, like say Microslop or a Christofascist national church, can harass developers aligned with non-rightwing principles via lawsuits. They don't have to prosper, they just have to cause a cost in money and quality-of-life.

[–] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 40 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Just put a "not for use in the state of California" disclaimer somewhere. Then automatically set every user's birthday to January 1st, 1970.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 12 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Many projects are doing the "not for use in California" thing. I'd set the birthday to yesterday - it is the safest. This is only useful as a do-not-track, and kids get the best protection there. For anything else - kids are well able to change their birthday on the computer, so if you want to protect kids from harmful content (whatever that is - no two people agree if you dig deep enough) you need something that is stronger than a claimed age.

[–] r0ertel@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

As a kid, me and a friend bought the game "Leisure Suit Larry" or one of the sequels. It included an age check because of adult content. After asking our age, which we dutifully entered as 19, it would ask questions that only an adult would know, like "who was the US president in 1962?" We would research these questions in my friend's encyclopedia to play the game.

Now, I have all this trivia knowledge in my head due to my childhood quest to see highly pixelated cartoon boobies in 640x480 resolution.

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 7 hours ago

which we dutifully entered as 19, it would ask questions that only an adult would know, like “who was the US president in 1962?”

To think there was a time when Amerikkkan adults actually knew some History, that the developers could trust to use as an age check! Quite the surprise, I imagine in part it was thanks to Carmen Sandiego.

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 5 points 12 hours ago

Now, I have all this trivia knowledge in my head due to my childhood quest to see highly pixelated cartoon boobies in 640x480 resolution.

Everyone wins!

[–] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

California can chew the bark off my big fat log, for all I care what laws they wanna pass. What’s Gavin gonna do? Send the lawyers to knock down my door? Meme me to death from Twitter?

The name’s Please. Bitch, Please.

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago
sudo uninstall --force age_verification_daemon

Honestly, this might inspire me to try installing Gentoo again. I’ll just skip the step involving that.

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 27 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

California does not make laws for the entire country or the entire world. Perhaps "Linux" should be distributed from elsewhere and offer zero compliance, from a location outside CA jurisdiction. I know there are some distros that are published from the EU for example.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

There are several people who work on linux who live in California who thus are subject to California laws. There are people who don't live in California who sometimes travel to California and thus could be subject to those laws at times (see a lawyer)

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago

Those people should all tell California to fuck off then. California can't tell me to do shit.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 4 points 15 hours ago

LOL login command line....

Error can I see your face please?
Nah! I got no camera and this is CLI.

Hmm okay, I guess.

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 11 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

You know why they're quiet? Because they don't answer to anybody.

[–] fta@lemmy.zip 2 points 14 hours ago

XD

Ya, I just assumed they wouldn’t comply.

[–] who@feddit.org 3 points 15 hours ago

I could see this being used as an excuse for governments to keep spending taxpayer money on Microsoft licenses, and for software/hardware companies not to support open operating systems like Linux.

California is the fourth-largest economy in the world.

Do it. See what happens with the internet when suddenly no Linux will boot without manual intervention.

[–] Dearth@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago

Roughly 1 in 8 Americans are Californians.

[–] chickenf622@sh.itjust.works 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

As is this bill is waaaay too broad. It seems the legislative body recognizes that so hopefully there will be a significantly narrower definition for what applications require age assurance. If you live in Cali call your state reps, and voice your concerns! I do like the idea of age verification via device attestation, way less invasive than uploading a pic of your ID to some chuckle-fuck 3rd party that is gonna get hacked. I would like no age verification being forced, but it looks like that is not gonna happen.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

it looks like that is not gonna happen.

It is if we avoid products and people associated with this. Warn the people.

But I don't live in California and my people are petty as fuck. Try to buy a coke in Newfoundland for the last 40 years.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

😂💪👏