this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
238 points (100.0% liked)

politics

28692 readers
2777 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Whether it was due to the early hour of the day or just to the blood-thirsty nature of the moment, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth appeared particularly unhinged during the first official news ...

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 2 points 1 hour ago

Is that why we're shooting down our own F-15s?

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago

He got torn apart by Trump behind closed doors and now he's overcompensating for his failures by being even more abusive than usual to try and salvage this and win daddy Trump's approval again. Because conservatives think hitting harder and being less empathetic is obviously the solution and since Trump is a raging narcissist and has zero empathy, the standard for what's acceptable is anything that doesn't harm Trump. Why would anyone think Trump, the racist, serial child rapist, would give a fuck about some brown children getting blown apart?

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 36 points 8 hours ago

Rules of engagement are literally how you define the difference between a civilian and an enemy combatant.

"No rules of engagement" is military lingo for "yes to all the war crimes."

[–] Bieren@lemmy.today 5 points 5 hours ago

He’s not high. He’s drunk.

[–] TomMasz@piefed.social 17 points 7 hours ago

I dunno, maybe putting an alcoholic psychopath in charge of the armed forces wasn't a great idea.

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 32 points 9 hours ago (8 children)

No stupid rules of engagement, no nation-building quagmire, no democracy-building exercise, no politically correct wars.

No democracy, no nation building. So what is the actual goal here? Just to shoot stuff for its own sake?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 40 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

Now I'm hearing that the commanders all gave their troops a speech about doing this for God and Christianity, etc., so it seems like the primary motivation was to kick off the End Times for the religious freaks.

So we're in it until The Rapture. Our entire world has to burn down to satisfy the fantasies of delusional religious weirdos, so the Sociopathic Oligarchs can comb through the rubble for treasure.

How about we just Rapture the entire MAGA leadership, and move on?

[–] Didntdoit71@feddit.online 4 points 5 hours ago

Call it whatever you want...just...make them stop...

[–] GutterRat42@lemmy.world 10 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

I am an atheist, but if heaven and hell exist, they should know, there is enough space in hell for them.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 12 points 8 hours ago

No god worth worshipping would condone their actions. I stand by the wisdom of Marcus Aurelius, that I will live a moral life and reject any god that has a problem with it. Killing to kill is the mandate of an evil god.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 8 hours ago

I understand. Whenever one of these psychopaths assume room temperature, I'm always slightly sad that I don't believe in their mythology.

When Dick Cheney croaked, I remember thinking that it would be really nice to be able to smile at the thought of him having his Welcome Orientation in Hell. Instead, I was just sad for the person who didn't get a heart because Cheney took it.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago

He just wasn’t getting that same high exploding South American fishermen anymore.

Tolerance is a hell of a drug.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 8 hours ago

Blow shit up so Iran can't attack back for the next generation.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] horn_e4_beaver@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

no nation-building quagmire

Surely this is how you build the next generation of aggrieved suicide bombers?

Oh, and create an absolutely massive migrant problem.

[–] GardenGeek@europe.pub 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

For whom?

Europe most probably. This will strenghten right wing parties and weaken thr union... win-win. While the majority of EU is licking US boots after they started a war of agression against a sovereign nation with little to no justification of any kind... I'm tired Boss.

[–] horn_e4_beaver@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

with little to no justification of any kind

I mean ~~Hegseth~~ Rubio said that it was pre-emptive retaliatory action for what the Iranians were surely going to do after the Israelis attacked them. Is that not good enough for you?

[–] f314@lemmy.world 86 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

No stupid rules of engagement

This sounds like a great way to get your planes shot down by allies!

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago

Let's see if it happens three times, just to be sure.

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 13 points 13 hours ago

friendly fire ain’t gonna fire itself

[–] e8CArkcAuLE@piefed.social 61 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Whether it was due to the early hour of the day or just to the blood-thirsty nature of the moment, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth appeared particularly unhinged during the first official news briefing about President Donald Trump’s attacks on Iran.

are they implying he was still drunk from the night before? 🤫

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 26 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I think a big part no one talks about, is all these old men are on gender affirming hormone care because their physical identity doesn't match their mental identity.

They want to be 20 again, so they're shooting up enough testorone that they have the logic and critical thinking of a 20 year old.

The alcoholism isn't helping, but that's not where the bloodlust is coming from.

I've had a couple friends try, and I honestly don't know why anyone over 40 would ever want to feel 20 again. They all love if for like 6-12 months, before they realize acting like they're 20 again isn't a good thing and it's fucking their lives up.

When the people running the country are on it, they're fucking all our lives up, the alcoholism is why Hegsworth can't come that realization on his own, or listen to anyone telling him.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

T shouldn't impact their logic or critical thinking, but it will impact their emotional regulation and impulse control. At least based on my experience with trans guys. And anecdotally when I started E I had about a year or so of getting into stupid fights with my mom despite knowing better before my body adjusted. Getting back to the right amount would probably calm them down, but these guys are more juiced up than a bodybuilder who can't do math. They're probably also being tilted by their grapes turning to raisins from that.

But yeah it's a drunken roid rage by a man who simply refused to mature or develop logic or critical thinking since their teens. And I think that's a bigger component to his inability to see than the T or the hooch. These men never grew the fuck up, and as such rather than living a good life at each stage, seeking to grow and mature until it is time to return to the earth, they strive to live a life eternally young and foolish, unable to even see that their unhappiness stems from this lifestyle.

And yeah, don't get me wrong, I miss feeling young, but hormonal instability wasn't fun either time. I like having stable emotions that can be reasonably controlled.

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 97 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Fun fact: the last head of state who launched a war without rules of engagement was Adolf Hitler.

[–] eddanja@lemmy.world 29 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] three@lemmy.zip 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

F is for fire that burns down the whole town!

U is for uranium... bombs!

N is for no survivors

[–] jim_v@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Planktonnn! That's not what fun is about!

[–] PoopSpiderman@lemmy.world 33 points 13 hours ago (5 children)

People dunk on Pete about alcohol because he’s been drunk at inappropriate times in the past, but I think they basically ignore the fact that he probably does a ton of blow too.

[–] ZiggyTheZygote@lemmy.ca 12 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

Definitely. He has to be sharp and focused while making terrible decisions.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

At what point do you suspect he's going to switch to meth like his idols?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The child that pulled wings off of flies.

[–] U7826391786239@piefed.zip 41 points 14 hours ago

people who should be spending decades in prison are instead starting wars with the rest of the world

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

My favorite was "no more politically correct wars"...... So I guess the only option moving forward is politically incorrect wars? I don't think I can keep up with the Machiavellian minds of this 4d chess administration.

[–] UpperBroccoli@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 9 hours ago

Macciavellian? Are you serious? Macchiavelli said you can be a cruel asshole, but the one thing you cannot be is unpredictable. Old Mac would have given this US government a 2/10 score.

[–] unnamed1@feddit.org 11 points 13 hours ago (5 children)

This is how Call of Duty receives new content. Too bad the Americans are the villains now :/

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Meshuggah333@piefed.world 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (4 children)

I'm surprised this idiot isn't calling himself "war secretary".

[–] NotAnonymousAtAll@feddit.org 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I have therefore determined that this Department should once again be known as the Department of War and the Secretary should be known as the Secretary of War.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/09/restoring-the-united-states-department-of-war/

[–] Meshuggah333@piefed.world 2 points 8 hours ago

There we go. 

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

I’m surprised he doesn’t consider the title ‘secretary’ to be to feminine

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 9 points 13 hours ago

Ergh these plebs trying tell hegseth how to fight wars, he was totally great at wars which is why his whole career was totally in the military, except for that time he left for a while because all those stupid generals wouldn't listen to his great ideas, well now look who has to listen to who huh?!

load more comments
view more: next ›