I want an angry zionist chud to kill matt walsh, it would be funny
Slop.
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
The Card Says Moops
You and I both know that you are latching onto a talking point you never used until 45 seconds ago
This encompasses most Republican stances
Chud, during brief moment of self awareness, accuses chud of doing thing chuds are known for doing.
It's the thing that makes me wonder just how self-aware some of these guys actually are. A lot of them are just grifters, doing it for the money and the power, they know what they are saying is bullshit, but they just don't care as long as they personally benefit.
Classic of the chud politics. They don't have any ideologies, just some charismatic leaders. They can change their minds in an instant for their leaders. If they don't change their mind, their leader is just pretending to change their mind, their leader is fooling his enemies. their leader is smart (he is very far from smart), trust the plan. I think this is true for almost all of the world.
In Turkey, chuds are very ok with Erdoğan continuing trade with israhell.
"Welcome to the resistance"
Or alternatively
"he's only siding with Iran because he's controlled by Russia"
my political party based on intellectual dishonesty is being intellectually dishonest!
You do not, under any circumstances, have to hand it to him
I had an anti-Iraq War teacher who lectured us for “providing aid and comfort to the enemy” after our school walkout.
Always against the war that was already fought, never against the current one.

He wants someone to pay to change his mind.

Wonder what happens to the Republicans once Trump kicks the bucket. Class solidarity will hold the party together I imagine, but people like MTG and Walsh here are pushing back things like Epstein and now this.
Class solidarity will hold the party itself together, but their lower-middle class (hate the term, but it's fine for this purpose) will not stick with them without Trump.
Matt Walsh finally noticed that being fired from DW is a better career move than staying there

The devastating response is that the hostages were released
Woah wtf, I read the whole thing before I saw who posted it. I myself am feeling some cognitive dissonance just reading this. Shouldn't he be praising the war?
My guess is the Candace Owens/ Nick Fuentes wing of the party are still pretty anti interventionist, unless that's changed?
Idk I literally cannot live my life and keep up with this bullshit.
Without getting into specific right-wing weirdos: there's long been an isolationist strain of conservative thought, and there's long been an antisemitic strain. The discord among conservatives is coming from those quarters.
Fuentes has already condemned the attack.
the firehose of gaslighting and lies isn't so fun when you're on the receiving end of it eh matty boy?
How did I know it was going to be Matt Walsh before I even clicked.
Democratic Party candidate for one of Kentucky's US Senate seats, Matt Walsh
this is interesting because he wants to posture as both not anti-war (because trump is pro this war) and antisemitic. bombing iran is ...maybe not so bad since trump's doing it okay? but also why are you just now saying this "just noticing." this is the exact thread that tucker carlson is on. walsh is basically a demonic fusion of carlson and hegseth. candace and fuentes are the next step down the line, both much more overtly antisemitic, spreading silly "talmudic jew" tropes.
in other words, matt's trying to show allegiance to the pro-war (trump loyalist), anti israel faction. he is...not great at it.
