this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2026
558 points (98.6% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

2951 readers
67 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hubi@feddit.org 113 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Please come back when you can afford to make a purchase. Your kids are starving. Carl's Jr. believes no child should go hungry. You are an unfit mother. Your children will be placed in the custody of Carl's Jr.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 62 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That movie isn’t funny anymore.

[–] DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

President Camacho knew that there was a problem and actively recruited the smartest person he could find...completely unrealistic.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

Terry Crews, without any additional training, would literally be the best president since Carter.

[–] yoyoyopo5@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] darkdemize@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 weeks ago

Fuck you, I'm eating!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 48 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The district says that it is trying to collect more than $20,000, and that other methods to get parents to pay have not been successful. Four parents owe at least $450 apiece. The letter claims the unpaid bills could lead to dependency hearings and removal of their children for not providing them with food. "You can be sent to dependency court for neglecting your child's right to food. The result may be your child being taken from your home and placed in foster care," the letter read. After complaints, district officials announced they plan to send out a less threatening letter next week. Luzerne County's manager and child welfare agency director have written the superintendent, insisting the district stop making what they call false claims. Their letter calls the district's actions troubling and a misrepresentation of how the Children and Youth Services Department and its foster care program operate. Wyoming Valley West's lawyer, Charles Coslett, said he did not consider the letters to be threatening. "Hopefully, that gets their attention and it certainly did, didn't it? I mean, if you think about it, you're here this morning because some parents cried foul because he or she doesn't want to pay a debt attributed to feeding their kids. How shameful," Coslett told WYOU-TV.

What a lovely person this Charles Coslett, attorney at law, is!

https://www.10tv.com/article/news/nation-world/kids-could-end-foster-care-over-lunch-debt-school-district-warns-parents-2019-jul/530-1952542e-0f2c-4b3a-b6f0-a32de5dbce58

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 46 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

because he or she doesn’t want to pay a debt attributed to feeding their kids.

$450 is like two trips to the grocery store these days, or even less for a big family. Maybe the parents aren't paying the school bill because they did spend the money on food. Everything's expensive as hell.

How shameful

Yes, threatening parents for being poor in an unaffordable country without social safety nets is shameful.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 36 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Enforcing this will cost more than just feeding the kids would.

[–] Nomorereddit@lemmy.today 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

We've been a prison country for a long time now bud. They'll find a way.

[–] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

America is 3% of the world population, yet has 25% of the worlds prison population. America runs on prison labor and debt slavery

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You forget that slavery is still legal for prisoners. They will put you in prison for stupid reasons because they want tons of free labor.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 30 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Didn't pay your Minch money? Then the state will now spend thousands over thousands of dollars to ruin your child's life!

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 24 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Seriously fucked up. They could feed all those kids for free for a fraction of what it would cost the state to forcibly put them in foster care.

I'm always reminded that the cruelty IS the point.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago

They could feed all the children for free for the cost of forcibly taking one child away.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago

This feels like a military recruitment strategy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago

whY wOn'T pOEpLe hAvE MoRE kIdS??

[–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Is there any other country where "lunch debt" is even a thing?

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Maybe we should do what Israel does and give people a monthly $260 per child payment until the child turns 18? I mean we pay for it there so why not implement it here?

[–] kablez@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yes, but it often works the other way. I've gone to school in Asia, Europe and Australia. IME lunch ladies will let some kids tick food up when they lack the funds.

Some kids pay it back, but I know for a fact many come from families who lack the means and they let it slide.

Ironic seeing a country like the USA so obsessed with Jesus being as far from his teachings as you can go.

[–] Bazell@lemmy.zip 22 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I cannot explain how, but I feel that this is just another start of great scheme on how to make Epstein's island 2.0.

[–] YaDownWitCPP@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

We don't need to make Epstein Island 2.0, we have Epstein Island at home...

[–] paul@lemmy.org 7 points 3 weeks ago

I can explain: the US government is filled with people connected to Epstein's island. People who either engaged in pedophillia or are completely fine with it. They've got an unlimited supply of children from the immigrants they're abducting off the streets. America is an evil country.

[–] Willoughby@piefed.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

We saw what our owners(until proven otherwise) do when they don't want to be found out.

What kind of sick shit do you think they're doing right now?

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 21 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Why do we even have this orphan-crushing machine?

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Imagine a child who grew up in lunch debt. Constantly aware of how awful their life is. Now take a portion of them at 18, give them training and weapons and send them to some country they grew up being told is bad and even responsible for their suffering. Tada.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] presoak@lazysoci.al 9 points 3 weeks ago

The more you crush them the harder they work.

Same for adults.

load more comments (2 replies)

So instead of free lunch we will take and house your kids and feed them and deprive them of family. Which will cost 100x more and is 10000x more evil than making kids pay for lunch

[–] Chivera@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

Something you'd hear Americans say it happens in communist countries

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

So that whole "greatest country in the world" thing was just propaganda?

Well shit.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Meahwhile, Some counties in Maryland have made school lunches free for all kids.

[–] jve@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nomorereddit@lemmy.today 4 points 3 weeks ago

Baltimore city, free lunch and breakfast! Grades and performance....not so good tho.

Don't let perfection be the enemy of good, I say.

[–] BigBananaDealer@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

i swear this pic is a decade old

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

If it's in the US it's older than that, our school lunches in the 70s didn't look this good

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Just_Lyin@lemmy.org 6 points 3 weeks ago

And if it's like my kid's school they just let them charge as much cake as they want to eat to their school account. If you tell them not to allow that they'll tell you that they can't not give children food. Motherfuckers also got a slushy machine.

[–] Retail4068@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (5 children)

I feel like pointing out a 6 year old edge case, where the school was rightly screeched at by just about everyone saying this is insane, followed up by an immediate apology, and funding to provide food to everyone is both a poor example of propaganda as well as a pretty decent case for safety kicking in at some point.

Sounds like the school was pretty poor and just made a bad decision to try and get more parents to pay. 

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] not_woody_shaw@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm seeing an opportunity for some rich schmuck to do some reputation-repair.

[–] nocturne@slrpnk.net 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

Short of paying for the entire meal program, it may not be possible. Some districts do not allow people to pay for meals/debt that is not their own.

When my youngest two kids were in elementary school I used to go eat lunch with them. One of the boys in my son's class had too much debt and they would not give him food. I tried to pay his debt ($20ish) and they would not let me, so I tried to pay for his meal, not allowed. So we went and sat down at the table and I gave him a twenty. The lunch lady accepted it, but gave me a hassle about it. I told her he found it in his pocket while we were eating.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm going to go way out on a limb and assume that placing children in foster care would cost the state more than just paying for their goddamn school lunches.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 4 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I have a suggestion: let corporations adopt children.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

School district going after parents is dumb, they should be asking all of the parents to attend school board and City council meetings or whichever governing body controls school funding from taxes with them to find out why school lunch isn't provided for all kids that need it

load more comments
view more: next ›