this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
425 points (99.5% liked)

politics

28509 readers
2794 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Kennedy made the swipe at the Democratic lawmaker during an interview with Fox News, saying she is "kind of like Vice President Kamala Harris, but with more bartending experience." He went on to say that she has "never been accused of being a policy maven."

AOC reacted on social media, saying "my having been a waitress makes me 1000x more qualified to govern on behalf of working people than whatever lifelong politician nonsense you've swung from your whole career."

"Why should working people vote for you if this is what you think of them?," she added.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 minutes ago

TBH I don't think any republican anywhere is qualified for any sort of leadership role of any kind.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 4 points 34 minutes ago (1 children)

I love the fact that he's making fun of her for NOT having an elitist background. What trash.

Whenever I'm arguing with someone about TACO I just point out that what we really needed was another rich, old, white man. That'll fix our problems.

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 minutes ago

Not just rich, born rich.

If someone worked themselves to death 80hrs/week to build a fortune, forgoing family or personal development. That might not be "healthy" but at least we could all point at their work ethic and tenacity as something worthwhile.

But this fuck was just born into it. Never had to work a day in his life, just living off daddies dime.

[–] binarytobis@lemmy.world 15 points 2 hours ago

I don’t want anyone in any political office who didn’t work at least six continuous months in a food service job.

Bartending is not easy, i know it's not obvious for somebody out there, but it is not an easy task.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 11 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

People still mock her for her bartending work?

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago

Yup, pedophiles trying to distract how corrupt and demonic they are.

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 hours ago

She is correct.

Look at Trump, he has never really worked a day of his life. He is basically detached from the reality of 99% of us.

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

All she needs is heavy, HEAVY use of the words "prosecute" and "list" and she's got my full support.

[–] alonsohmtz@feddit.uk 19 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

One of the few politicians I'd vote for president.

[–] binarytobis@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I don’t know much about AOC beyond the occasional headline, but I do know that every time a right winger complains about her to me like “Look! See, she’s absolutely crazy!” it’s because she’s doing or saying something that is common sense.

That’s probably a good sign.

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

or "look at this commoner trying to be a politician, she even had a real job once.. what a loser!"

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 25 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Just for numbers sake, "Accommodation and food services" (which would include bartenders) is the third largest US workforce at ~8%.

Congress has 435 members, so at least 35 or so should have a background in bartending or similar work if we really are having a representative government.

Sounds like we need more AOCs.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Congress has 535 members, you’re off by 100. It should be 43 members with food service experience.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Whoops, I said Congress, but meant the US House of Representatives (since that is what AOC is).

The Senate has an even 100, so plus another 8 on their side.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Congress has 435 members, so at least 35 or so should have a background in bartending or similar work if we really are having a representative government.

Sorry, best I can do is a bunch geriatric members of congress, political dynasties, and life long politicians.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

You said the same thing three times…

There’s nothing wrong with life-long politicians, but we need more variety and less concern for getting reelected over doing what’s right.

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 108 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

i love how fucking terrified the GOP is of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. to be fair, they should be.

if the only thing you can think of to criticize is "you worked at a bar," then your position is absurdly, pathetically, hilariously weak

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 15 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Trump "worked" at a McD, lol

[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 hours ago

Didn't even last a day

[–] GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It was probably just that he was having a dementia episode at the time, but he seemed genuinely happier than I've ever seen him before when he was working that drive thru.

It was all the attention he was getting for doing so. You can bet they curated those coming through who were MAGA.

[–] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 57 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

They are making fun of a normies citizen what became a representative of the people. Do they not realize that?

Rich folks should be banned from being in politics, honestly.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 hour ago

Rich people should just be banned

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 76 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

AOC lives rent free in these people's heads.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 12 points 3 hours ago

I mean, she's almost tailor-made to make them practically short out.

One, she's obviously a smoke-show and we might as well acknowledge that fact. Add to that, she is obviously very smart and a great speaker, and not afraid to speak up. Being a woman and a POC compounds their feels. She's also often aligned with the likes of Bernie on many issues.

Add all this up, and it's no wonder most Republicans behave like confused middle-school boys and don't know what to do with their conflicted feelings and end up saying/doing things that more or less boil down to the equivalent of pulling her hair and snapping her bra.

It usually comes out so incoherent and cringe - I seem to remember some winger(s) saying something about how she was a "hypocrite" for dating a white guy?

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 10 points 5 hours ago

I'm more than happy not to charge her rent.

…that sounds creepy, but I just mean I'm glad she's in politics fighting the progressive fight, and I support her. lol

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 26 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

... And their AI-generated fantasies. Eww....

[–] null@lemmy.org 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Ben Shapiro has spent at least $1,000 generating AOC foot porn.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

That's what they need all those data centers for

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sabin10@lemmy.world 17 points 5 hours ago

Imagine not being a wealthy nepobaby

[–] manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Closers and openers can complain about each other, FoH and BoH can banter, at the end of the day they're all on the same team. Fuck off, service work is work.

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 minutes ago

And some of the hardest, lowest paid jobs I've ever worked.

Seriously, commerical kitchens can suck.

[–] heiligerbimbam@lemmy.wtf 9 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I would celebrate so much if she became president one day. Those old white men would be so pissed off.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

I hope she runs for NY governor or something soon. I'd like to see her as president, but I don't think her campaign would have much success if her only political experience is as a congresswoman. Historically, it's hard for a presidential candidate to succeed without first having some experience in an executive role (like governor, or as a general). Plus, imagine how much she and Mandami could get done together if he were running NYC and she were the governor.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I think the party has already made a deal with her: if she agrees to not run for President in 2028, they will clear the field for her to take Chuck's Senate seat instead.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I think she could do better than that.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 1 points 53 minutes ago

The Senate is a good gig, it can be a lot easier to get foreign policy experience there than as a Governor.

[–] deifyed@lemmy.wtf 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I mean; she can't possibly have less experience than the current president

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

And look how that has worked out.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

It is ridiculous.

It does the elitism of the politicians. The representatives supposed represent us but they are nultimillionaires and even billionaires.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

According to stupid right wing narratives and framing, being a centimillionaire or a billionaire is not elitist, but knowing stuff, having an education and qualifications and experience is "elitist".

So, a scientist, still paying off student loans decades later (but when they talk about their subject matter, they make a winger feel talked down to) - elitist.

Scumbag parasitic idle rich jackass born with a silver spoon in their mouth, never worked a day in their lives, and accrued billions - NOT elitist.

Since the cons have so distorted the concept of elitist to mean only someone that's educated, smart, etc., and has no money/power component to it, I'm kind of glad that people have started talking about the Epstein Class. Because when we talk about elitist jackasses, I have the feeling that we are talking about money/power and the base of the Republican Party think "poindexters that went to college".

[–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 2 points 2 hours ago

So billionaires are, by definition, stupid and proud of it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] X@piefed.world 8 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Responding to the fascists seems to me a lot like trying to have a meaningful conversation with one of those inflatable dancing tube men things. You’re well within your rights, but you’re trying to have a conversation with nothing more than a bag of wind that always goes limp the moment someone pulls its cord.

[–] thevoidzero@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago

I take it as her response is for people, not for him. Sometimes people need someone to spell out things. Like the representative thing, so they can understand billionaires might not have their best interest at heart over someone that actually has gone through the same struggles they are under.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 8 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Does he think harris was that bad. I had no issue with harris which is why I voted for her. I mean satan, it would be hard to have an issue with someone as bad as the battrump crazy that is republicans now.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 10 points 5 hours ago

Does he think

I'm going to stop you there. :)

load more comments
view more: next ›