this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
25 points (85.7% liked)

Technology

81803 readers
3959 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

They are testing a 26Ah battery pouch and were able to charge it at a 11C rate for 3 min and it retained 98.4% charge!!

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] realitista@lemmus.org 1 points 42 minutes ago

So, a guy with a PHD thesis on solid state batteries is saying that these results are not as promised

[–] Nomad@infosec.pub 5 points 17 hours ago

This result matches largely with the startups claims. Given what they tested, cycle times and aging are largely unknown and thermal management requirements are quite high for fast charging, this results in problems with packing, aging and charge losses. Its a nice first step, but there is a ways to go until market readiness IMHO.

I'm something of an electrical engineer but not a battery expert by any means.

[–] cron@feddit.org 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I think the "it retains 98% charge" quote might be misleading. Thats true for the capacity (in Ah), but not for the energy (in Wh). The report shows this clearly in the tables:

Efficiency is about 83% if my math is right (which is still good).

[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago

Last paragraph

Under the specified test conditions, the cell was successfully charged at 5C for more than 9 minutes, and 100 % of the charged capacity was available during the subsequent discharge. The cell was also successfully charged at 11C for more than 3 minutes, with 98.4–99.6 % of the charged capacity available after a full charge.

[–] SnoringEarthworm@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Please don't make the post link go straight to a file.

Weirds me out when I think I'm going to a website and suddenly it's asking where I want to download to.

[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works -1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Sorry but there is only a PDF of the results, ill go make a website just so you and the 8 other people aren't weirded out by a PDF...

[–] SnoringEarthworm@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

This is the original website you could have linked.

https://idonutbelieve.com/

[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 hours ago

HOW ABOUT NO!

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Man if this is actually real it wi be crazy. I'm waiting for some crazy limitation to be discovered.

[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Next week they are releasing more testing This is from a legitimate testing company in Poland

[–] cron@feddit.org 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

The report is from an independant institute from Finland, not Poland:

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd

[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago