Pelicanen

It doesn't have to be true, it just has to convince his base and that's a low bar.

Well, that could make the popup unusable depending on screen size. I think the wording is pretty clear, the issue is just that there's no followup and not clear enough incentives to avoid skirting the rules at the moment.

Not "make it easy", it's "make it as easy", meaning it can't be easier to accept than to revoke, much clearer bar.

That's already part of the GDPR, companies just aren't complying with it.

From the official GDPR site:

To comply with the regulations governing cookies under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive you must:

• Receive users’ consent before you use any cookies except strictly necessary cookies.
• Provide accurate and specific information about the data each cookie tracks and its purpose in plain language before consent is received.
• Document and store consent received from users.
• Allow users to access your service even if they refuse to allow the use of certain cookies
• Make it as easy for users to withdraw their consent as it was for them to give their consent in the first place.

...isn't that technically rape?

Combined with their last two sentences

although it has to do with so many factors that are helping them intentionally.(example they made up majority labs in universities, preferred over men in probably hire situations as part of thier "demographic" goals.

Their comment reads a bit like "how do you do fellow ~~kids~~ non-misogynists"

First person to win two Nobel prizes and the only person to win the Nobel prize in two different scientific fields.

So basically that's why it will never be 100% correct all the time, because all of the output is just more or less correct hallucination.

This is completely correct, it does the exact same thing when it works as people expect as it does when it's "hallucinating".

I am mostly in agreement with you but why would the area of the car matter? You can potentially have bigger crumple zones, but that'd exclude the space that is used for passengers. Other than that, the energy transferred in a collision is relative to the mass, where the lighter vehicle receives a larger proportion of the energy than the heavier one.

I stand corrected. But still, that would include 100% of democrats and independents voting in unison, which seems unlikely (think Sinema, Fetterman, Manchin).

The democrats (including the independents who caucused with them) had a 58% vote share in the senate and 58.8% in the house of representatives in the 111th congress. A supermajority requires two thirds, i.e. 67%.

That isn't true, and even if that had been true, Obama left office 9 years ago, how is it even remotely relevant?