this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2026
78 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

81710 readers
4498 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The use of automatic license plate readers has exploded across the country in recent years. The cameras on roads and freeways that take images of the back of passing cars are popular with police for solving crimes.

But as President Trump's immigration enforcement crackdown has escalated in recent months, residents of various American cities are urging local leaders to stop using these cameras, citing fears of mass surveillance and concerns that local data could be aiding a federal deportation dragnet.

Many of the grassroots campaigns have targeted cameras made by Flock Safety, an Atlanta-based company that has contracts with more than 5,000 law enforcement agencies across the country. Some cities have grappled with the issue and decided to keep their cameras due to public safety, but in a number of places, the pressure has worked.

The liberal college towns of Flagstaff, Ariz., Cambridge, Mass., Eugene, Ore. and Santa Cruz, Calif., are among a list of at least 30 localities that have either deactivated their Flock cameras or canceled their contracts since the beginning of 2025 – with much of the activity happening in just the last three months.

"We are seeing a lot more momentum," said Will Freeman, a Colorado-based activist who opposes the cameras and runs the DeFlock.me website, which through crowdsourcing has mapped the locations of more than 76,000 license plate readers across the country. "I expect there to be more cities dropping Flock."

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SARGE@startrek.website 14 points 1 hour ago

A couple flock cameras near my town keep getting taken out and put back up.

The latest blurry security camera footage to catch the culprit has led to sweet FA since they ride a nondescript dark color mountain bike, wear all black clothing without logos or text, and seem to avoid riding their bike unmasked near businesses with cameras and houses that might have door cameras.

I don't even think they know gender/skin/hair color. Anything other than "average human height" really.

Anyway, shout out to everyone who destroys one of these things. It's illegal, but it's the morally correct thing to do.

[–] OldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.world 14 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck Flock and fuck Garrett Langley with a wooden tent stake; Trump style.

I've got a lens over my plate that looks blurry unless you look at it straight on at eye level. We'll be like China soon.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Where'd you get that? For my friend...

[–] finalarbiter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 44 minutes ago (1 children)

Beware, obstructing your license plate can get you a ticket in a plurality of states. Not saying you shouldn't do it, just that you should be informed about potential consequences.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 2 points 39 minutes ago

Yup. Was just looking mine up and it seems like any material is illegal. If it only affected visibility from certain vertical angles I might be willing to give it a go.

[–] Mynameisallen@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 1 points 44 minutes ago (1 children)

Hrmm. Double checked my state law. I think most of those would run afoul of that. Are there versions that are visible within certain ranges vertically but all ranges horizontally? I think that might still run afoul but would be less likely to be caught just driving around.

[–] Mynameisallen@lemmy.zip 1 points 41 minutes ago

Not that I'm aware of, I'm in Michigan and while I'm not 100% sure of it being illegal I'm willing to take a cop to court to prove that it is