this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
193 points (99.5% liked)

Today I Learned

28313 readers
397 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

François "Pierre" Picaud (French: [piko]) was a 19th-century shoemaker in Nîmes, France who may have been the basis for the character of Edmond Dantès in Alexandre Dumas, père's 1844 novel The Count of Monte Cristo.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Allut's deathbed confession forms the bulk of the French police records of the case [about Picaud]. The detailed description of Picaud's experiences in prison, which could not have been known to Allut, were supposedly dictated to him by the ghost of Father Torri.

Hmm, all sounds pretty sketchy. More like a screenplay itself than solid, verifiable facts.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Could be.

I'll still enjoy the story.

[–] Hamartia@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Check www.abebooks.com they're pretty good for finding obscure editions. The prices for some of the rarer items can be hhhhhigheee though.

[–] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

amazon bought-out abebooks. Biblio.com is where its at.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fantastic book. Might not be for everyone, as it was written long ago, so language and style might be an issue for some.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

It's one of my favorite stories. Probably the only "classic" story that I really enjoyed reading.

[–] Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 days ago (3 children)

This book was such an interesting combination between a chore and a joy to read. I remember audibly gasping at some of the twists, but the antiquity of the language made it a slow go, at least for me.

Crazy to think it might be based on a true story.

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Dumas' work was printed in papers in episodes. He was paid by the word. That makes his prose bit long-winded and verbose.

I had no idea he was paid by the word! It's been making me feel better that I'm not the only one who struggled.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

The first "classic" writer that I enjoyed was Jukes Verne because his translations were very easy to read.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Understandable. I had that same issue with Frankenstein: great story, real work to get through.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

My dad showed me the opening paragraph of Don Quixote, from a (Brazilian) 1950s edition he got, which is apparently one of the better translations. It felt like I was trying to decipher some arcane scroll

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 13 points 2 days ago

TIL - thank you!

Also, Dumas based D'Artagnan from The Three Musketeers and it's sequels (the last of which was The Man in the Iron Mask) on an account of the life of Charles de Batz de Castelmore D'Atagnan, later Captain in the Musketeers and also for a time Governor of Lille.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

And, as with the book, this whole saga did play out over 10+ years.

Wild. I can honestly respect Pierre's dedication.

This is one of those things where I have no idea how I lived this long without learning it, because I love the book, love the 2002 film, and watch it a few times every single year.

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago

such an amazing book for sure one of my all time favorites

i have a antique leather bound version but only the second book.... maybe one day I can find it a matching pair

the illustrations in it are exquisite

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 1 day ago

For the curious: The book is ok. The movie remake (there's been two or three movies made, I think) from the early 2000's is fantastic; but the thing is, it's so different from the book that it's barely deserving of sharing a name. Like, there's an arching similarity in story, but that's about it. The story in the movie is better.