this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
78 points (100.0% liked)

News

36063 readers
3532 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Jeffrey Epstein’s estate has agreed to pay as much as $35m to resolve a class-action lawsuit that accused two of the disgraced financier’s advisers of aiding and abetting his sex trafficking of young women and teenage girls, according to a court filing.

Boies Schiller Flexner, a law firm representing Epstein victims, announced the settlement in a brief filed in federal court in Manhattan on Thursday.

The deal, if approved by a judge, would bring an end to a 2024 lawsuit filed against Epstein’s former personal lawyer Darren Indyke and former accountant Richard Kahn, who are co-executors of the late Epstein’s estate.

Epstein’s estate previously set up a restitution fund that paid out $121m to victims. The estate also paid out $49m in additional settlements to victims.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Why does his estate have any money left?

WTAF.

[–] FukOui@lemmy.zip 26 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] Stormy@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's 1,200 victims. 39m =29,000 each to shut up forever.

I got 130k settlement to shut up for an attempted SA. 30k seems insulting.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I got 130k settlement to shut up for an attempted SA

But you clearly didn't! /s

[–] hector@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah no way the survivors should accept that paltry amount if they agree to forfeit all future claims. They should sue some other groups too, like the banks and financial institutions that worked with epstein, they knew what they were doing, they knew he was an intelligence asset and went along.

It looks like there were $121m and $49m payouts previously as well, making a total of ~$200m. Still seems p low though.

[–] cannibalkitteh@piefed.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Epstein's estate? There should be no fucking estate, burn that shit to the ground and salt the earth so nothing grows again.

[–] foggianism@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Exactly? And why can the Epstein estate buy itself out of criminal charges in the first place? Isn't heavy crime under ingerence of the court on US federal level? This isn't some misdemeanor, a fight between neighbors that's being settled out of court

[–] tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Like when Google gets a slap on the wrist. 1% fine for getting caught.

I'm sure Epstein will learn his lesson after this

[–] JennyLaFae@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 days ago

If only the justice system was actually just and the scales not piled with gold

[–] hector@lemmy.today 4 points 2 days ago

They should band together and sue Israel, and or any front groups, and companies complicit in epstein's operation. There are plenty of banks that were involved, I'm sure some israeli firms, to say nothing of Israel themselves although the feds would kaibosh that I'm sure.

[–] sepi@piefed.social 4 points 2 days ago

No money. Blood.