Technology

42261 readers

327 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

gyrfalcon@beehaw.org

rs5th@beehaw.org

coldredlight@beehaw.org

SemioticStandard@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

remington@beehaw.org

CIOs told: Prove your AI pays off – or pay the price (www.theregister.com)

submitted 5 hours ago by Powderhorn@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Well, well, well ... if it isn't the consequences of my own actions.

The clock is ticking for AI projects to either prove their worth or face the chopping block.

Or so says data management and machine learning biz Dataiku, which commissioned research conducted online by the Harris Poll to get a snapshot of the views from 600 Chief information officers (CIOs) across the US, UK, France, Germany, UAE, Japan, South Korea, and Singapore.

The report, "The 7 Career-Making AI Decisions for CIOs in 2026," claims AI is facing corporate accountability in 2026 after several years of investment into research and pilot projects. CIOs are worried their careers are on the line if the tech's effectiveness falls short of expectations.

Money continues to be pumped into AI as the next great thing in business, but a growing number of studies have found that adopting AI tools hasn't helped the bottom line, and enterprises are seeing neither increased revenue nor decreased costs from their AI projects.

top 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] irotsoma@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 36 minutes ago

Unfortunately, they first laid off all the employees they were promised would be made redundant by the AI. They should have verified that the AI was doing it's promised job before that. Lol. At the company I work for they just gave early retirements to all of the people with all the knowledge as part of layoffs with AI as the reason given for the layoffs. We're all screwed because AI has had zero positive effect in any projects I've seen, and I'm a software architect, so I see a lot.

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 26 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Or pay the price

You mean getting another job making more money than you should and making bad decisions with 0 consequences? Like C suites ever face any real consequences for the society distorting behavior they exhibit

[–] SoupBrick@pawb.social 4 points 4 hours ago

They will pay the price of having to plea for a bailout from the administration (using taxpayer money).

[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 1 points 1 hour ago

I'm sure they're quaking at the thought of floating out on their golden parachutes...

[–] RiceMunk@sopuli.xyz 11 points 4 hours ago

if the tech’s effectiveness falls short of expectations

What, the "This will literally replace every role in our company except my own" expectations?

[–] SalamenceFury@piefed.social 7 points 4 hours ago

LOL

[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 14 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Is that a 'pop' I am hearing in the distance?

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 hours ago

Gonna be a fuckin’ explosion if it doesn’t happen soon.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 hours ago

Ah, the CIOs (Chief Idiot officers) are starting to figure it out.