this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2026
125 points (96.3% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

15637 readers
734 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

What's the point in creating a law that bans Sharia Law when the people who would allegedly institute mandatory observation of Sharia Law would just vote to repeal it and then institute it anyway?

Oh, right, Republicans are fucking idiots and this is scaremongering to drive them to the polls.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

A lot of this is a tacit attempt to control Muslim municipal populations be restricting how they govern themselves locally.

So you can step in at the state (maybe federal, if Chip Roy gets his way) level and announce this mayor or judge or city council is illegitimate because the leadership isn't Christian.

[–] Bombastic@sopuli.xyz 16 points 3 hours ago (4 children)

Do Americans actually get text messages like those? I thought it was a joke

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

I have personally never gotten any voting text messages, but I've received a few voting emails recently from the scum in my neck of the woods. I personally find it sad and pathetic, but then again, I'm not the type who is easily swayed by an email or text.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 hours ago

The dem ones are at least somewhat sane

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

YMMV. But if you volunteer regularly for campaigns, your number/address inevitably ends up on someone's suckers list. And then election season means getting your phone blown up by these as the voting deadline closes in.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes

We also get them as postcards

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Where's the reset button? Do I have to stick a needle into the Washington Monument or something?

[–] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Excuse me but Republicans have been in control of Texas for like 30 years straight. So does that mean that they the Republicans are trying to install Sharia law in order to prevent it?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Very specifically, this is in response to EPIC City, a master-planned community north of Dallas that's being bankrolled by a group of Muslim real estate developers. But you can see it echoing the disgust conservatives have for Minneapolis and Dearborn, Michigan, with their own large Muslim populations.

[–] officermike@lemmy.world 104 points 6 hours ago (17 children)

Good thing we only mutilate boys' genitals.

Thank you for mentioning this. I don't even have that set of equipment, and it boggles my mind that this is normal and acceptable to anyone. Even using religion as a reason just seems ridiculous. Why the hell would you ever cause that much physical pain to a child for a cosmetic procedure?

"Oh, they're transing the kids!" Fucker, you asked your doctor to cut off part of your son's junk before he even developed the capacity to lift his own head. Shut the fuck up.

[–] Fokeu@lemmy.zip 53 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

It's still shocking to me how most Americans consider genital mutilation a normal thing. My European mind can't comprehend.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 17 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

If it shocks you farther, it's just a little check box when you have a baby boy. Just a little bit of the paperwork before discharge. You don't even have to be there, and it's "free". Very strange, all things considered.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 15 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Free? Free?!! In a hospital, in the U S of A?!!! Ok now I'm really shocked.

[–] MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

It's not free. It costs hundreds of dollars. The user above may have had it covered by insurance, but that's a different thing. Entirely NOT free

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 11 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, phew. I was worried for a minute there.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Well, it's "free" under insurance, yes. The bigger thing is that it's covered under every insurance and I think Medicaid, the public assistance healthcare. Not that it's all that expensive when a birth is like, tens of thousands of dollars sometimes.

I've never met anyone who paid for it, though. I wouldn't be surprised if it was in law that you had to cover it (while shit like birth control is still debated).

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 hours ago

Insurance gets charged if it is done, but a friend told me there is no actual charge to the parents. She said there was a lot of pushback about not getting it done and that was one of their "selling points" when she said she wasn't going to pay for it. Seems like fraud of some kind.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

"Now that your son is born, would you also like us to cut off a bit of his penis? It's only $500 if you have a coupon!"

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 2 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Do you get to keep the leftovers?

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

Only at hospitals that decline to accept tips.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Nah... they let you keep the placenta, sure, but the doc gets to keep the foreskin for their special baby skin leather doctor's coats.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] tomiant@piefed.social 4 points 3 hours ago

Filthy heathens! OUR faith allows pet dogs!

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 18 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
  • Texas keeps trying to force Christianity into public schools
  • Texas has a bounty system for women who lose a child in childbirth
  • Texas continues to use the 13th loophole to compel labor without pay for prisoners
  • In Texas, emancipated minors and teens with parental permission can be married over the age of 16
  • Texas actually bans FGM, but they do allow male genital mutilation
  • Texas police do also shoot dogs.
[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 7 minutes ago

Some real big projection going on.

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 19 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

"NO religious freedom," so let's ban that religion? Every religion believes theirs is correct.

"Women brutalized" "Slavery allowed" "Child marriage & rape" These things are already illegal from our other laws.

"Girl genital mutilation" I think this one is already illegal, as well.

"No pet dogs allowed" First of all, wut? But second of all, I'd love to see some Texas politician try to pass a law that outlawed pet dogs. They'd probably get shot to death by the other politicians before they left the chamber.

"BAN SHARIA NOW!" BAN MARTIANS NOW! BAN FISH RIDING BICYCLES NOW! BAN ADULTS FROM SEEING WHY KIDS LOVE CINNAMON TOAST CRUNCH NOW! BAN LICKING UNTIL YOU GET TO THE TOOTSIE ROLL CENTER OF A TOOTSIE POP NOW!

BAN POLITICIANS WHO WASTE OUR TIME WITH MEANINGLESS LAWS AND CULTURE WARS NOW!

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 3 points 3 hours ago

Every religion believes theirs is correct.

From a purely argumentative standpoint, that doesn't mean that one of them isn't. Again, strictly from a rhetorical point of view.

These things are already illegal from our other laws

From a rhetorical point of view, strictly, one could say, if one were to defend the statement, which I'm not, but one could, hypothetically say that any religion actively espousing those things is worthy of condemnation regardless of our laws.

“Girl genital mutilation”

Same goes for this. Hypothetically.

“No pet dogs allowed”

Yeah I don't know either. Even hypothetically.

BAN MARTIANS NOW!

No notes.

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 hours ago

Child marriage and rape (within marriage) are legal in far too many US States.

Slavery is allowed in far too many US States.

Brutalizing women (if you consider things like revocation of bodily autonomy or incarceration for miscarriages) is legal in far too many US States. If you consider unpunished crimes against women, though illegal, it is far too common in many US States.

Many landlords forbid having pets and there's little to no recourse for pets killed by the state.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Also these are laws that Christians insisted were fundamental for their religion in our country's past. Hell, some still say that.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 28 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Fundies are salivating to do the same thing

[–] jumperalex@lemmy.world 23 points 6 hours ago

Seriously I was waiting for the punch line at the bottom, "... Just like Christian Nationalists"

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 16 points 6 hours ago

Isn’t all of this what republicans want, just swap fake Christianity in for the only religion, and allow pet dogs (but also the state can kill them randomly with no consequences)?

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 20 points 6 hours ago

This just sounds like Texas on a regular day minus the dog thing.

[–] NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social 10 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

If you just change "GIRL genital mutilation" to "BOY genital mutilation", that list is all things America is famous for.

[–] GalacticSushi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 5 hours ago

We're allowed to own dogs. Until a cop comes within shooting distance, at least.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 hours ago

How does this even make sense mechanically? What would it mean when one system of law bans another system of law?

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Yo is there any way to weaponize this into banning all binding arbitration because that would be based.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›