this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2026
293 points (100.0% liked)

politics

28358 readers
2187 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 83 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 41 points 1 day ago

Holy fuck, I can see why trump doesn't want this shown. He's a Christian that is the opposite of trump and a great speaker.

[–] kylie_kraft@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unfortunately the chilling effect is still, erm, effective. A few thousand might see it instead of a few million. The political weaponization of the FCC has been devastating overall.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

His youtube views are already over 1 million.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 12 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Over 2 million now a few hours later. Streisand Effect in full force.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

Almost half way to 4 now

[–] kylie_kraft@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm glad to hear it. I still think the blackout will be a net loss to viewership.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago

I would never have seen it, I don't really watch network television. I bet there are a lot of Texans that also wouldn't have seen it otherwise. This is a great thing.

[–] jaycifer@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Well let’s get some data involved then. According to this article from mid last year, The Late Show was averaging ~2.5 million viewers in the Nielsen ratings: https://www.tvinsider.com/1202434/late-night-ratings-2025-gutfeld-kimmel-colbert-fallon/

Looking through the youtube channel, the average uploaded video over the last couple weeks has ~600,000 views. The biggest one scrolling down was almost 2 weeks ago with 2.5 million views as of now. Of course it’s not all one to one, but assuming no crossover between youtube and TV viewers, this interview would have to hit at least 3-3.5 million views to be more popular than the average segment, and higher than 5 million views to absolutely guarantee that it is more popular than an already popular segment.

At time of writing the interview has 2.3 million views after 16 hours, almost matching the TV audience for an episode, matching an 11 day popular video, and I’m about to add one more to the count which I normally wouldn’t. You can hold your belief if you want, but I am curious to see how it pans out over the next week or two.

[–] MumboJumbo@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

3 hours after your post, up to 3.4 million views. Just for people scrolling through these comments to see.

[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Went would the FCC have anything to say about the content of this incredibly tame interview?

[–] 3rdXthecharm@lemmy.ml 6 points 23 hours ago

My thought is that it's part of the enforcement of that 'fair time' bullshit. They're covering their asses in case they haven't allowed enough 'conservative candidates' similar time on air

[–] easyloot@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And it's not just the Colbert show. I'm deleting more and more and more media apps/accounts/etc. Pretty soon it will just be whatever comes up on Lemmy.

[–] johncandy1812@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Unfortunately The Daily Show, The Weekly Show with Jon Stewart and Late Night with Colbert are all Larry Ellison productions so even though they may sound adversarial they're just helping to treat Trump like politics-as-usual in the US.

It really isn't though. This is an authoritarian coup. By the time the elections roll around it'll be too late to make them fair and democratic. The Media is one of the reasons why.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Here's his website, if you want to learn more about Talarico:

https://jamestalarico.com/meet-james-talarico/

As a legislator, I’ve passed major legislation to fund our neighborhood schools, expand job opportunities for young adults, and lower the cost of child care, housing, and prescription drugs.

I’ve led the fight against the billionaire mega-donors that have rigged the system against working Texas families. And I’m the only member of the Texas Legislature who has never taken corporate PAC money.

Now, as those same billionaire mega-donors take over the federal government, we need more fighters in Washington who will take power back for working people.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Brilliant Stressand Effect.

Talarico certainly knows how to work the angles. One reason I'm bullish for him in the general. If anyone has a chance at flipping Texas, its a guy who makes $1 in spending feel like $100.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 10 points 20 hours ago

Freedom of speech baby, to bad USA doesn't have it.

[–] massacre@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago

Looks like the Streisand effect in full play: https://www.rawstory.com/james-talarico-2675277614/

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Jasmine Crockett is alright, but the regime is clearly more frightened of Talarico. Sad that (I think) he's polling behind her.