this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
38 points (95.2% liked)

Business

2026 readers
70 users here now

A place to share business news and insights.


Rules


  1. Follow lemmy.world rules
  2. Only post content related to business
  3. Do not use this community to promote your business

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"So I think the customer has spoken. That's the punchline," he said during Tuesday's earnings call. Ford's EV unit posted a $4.8 billion loss in 2025, as sales of its Mustang Mach-E, F-150 Lightning, and E-Transit fell 14% from a year earlier.

Now, the automaker is reshaping its electric strategy — shifting toward lower-cost, high-volume EVs and leaning harder into hybrids. It's a reversal of Ford's early strategy of electrifying its most iconic, priciest vehicles first, betting that brand loyalty and subsidies would offset sticker shock.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Adulated_Aspersion@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago

Dont forget that Ford spent the last several years producing $90k trucks and $55k SUVs with 250 miles of range in PERFECT conditions.

If you arent going to innovate through mileage capacity, you must make up for it elsewhere: longevity, performance, or value.

Make the price approachable for anyone.

And by the way. Fix the problems in your existing line. Hey Ford: if you didnt know, the HVAC system in all of your F150's, including the Lightning, abaolutely sucks ass.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

"We purposely sabotaged an entire division that the previous management team hyped up and it failed because of that."

"The Customer has spoken."

[–] dhtseany@lemmy.ml 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They promised $40k trucks but delivered $100k trucks instead. They made the infamous sports car mustang into a 4 door mom car that looked stupid. They never had the inventory on hand when we went for our first test drives. "Nobody wants EVs, the consumer has spoken!" No, you twats, we couldn't afford them. We're waiting on BYD to finally arrive so they'll obliterate you idiots into dropping the prices substantially.

[–] Psaldorn@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The customers are the dealerships in this scenario

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ford sucks but I think a lot of people don't understand how much the dealerships also sabotaged EVs

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

When looking to buy a car a while back, dealerships kept pushing us away from hybrid and electric. It seemed pretty obvious that the issue was they couldn't keep electric cars in stock and had a lot of gas cars just sitting on the lot.

That also meant the electrics were priced at market value, while the gas cars all had big deals/discounts.

[–] bytesonbike@discuss.online 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why would I buy a electric vehicle from a company that has a history of recalls, dropped DEI, and singlehandedly made pickup trucks bigger to market to douchebags? The general population call Fords the "Fix Or Repair Daily" vehicle.

Im not buying that shit.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He's talked about this before, he drives all sorts of competitors cars to better understand them. He likes this one specifically, but him not driving a Ford isn't anything special.

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

If buy one if they were affordable and weren't always fucking tracking me or measuring me in some way. Install the motor, working doors, maybe a radio, maybe AC, and give it to me. I don't need the rest. I actually hate driving anyways and only need it to go to work. The rest is probably why it costs so damn much. I don't need my car to talk to me.

[–] rayyy@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

Ford to stake entire future on buggy whips.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Had me worried in the first half, lol.

That said, if he's planning to compete with Chinese EV's then he's going to have to figure out how to get around their $3 Minimum Wage.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

One of the articles on this topic claimed wages were 8% of the cost of a truck, when made in us. So all this bitching and moaning about how it’s all the fault of workers wanting livable wages, the difference is under 8% of the overall cost.

Somehow prices seem double, so clearly it’s not based on the 8%

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Look, wages should be higher, but by allowing those Chinese shitmobiles on the market we're not allowing higher wage workers to compete at all. Consumers in general won't know or care while making choices.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

I'd pay 5% more for a car to cover the difference in wages. But that's not driving the price.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

If true, this is where tariffs can be a useful tool. Slap an 8% tariff on Chinese made cars to even the playing field and let them all compete on their own merits

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 points 22 hours ago

TBH I'd be fine with Embargoing China and Russia altogether. Show the same spine the USA had in the 20th century.