For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
Looking the other way during a genocide
Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't she personally vote to send more weapons to the genocidal entity and justify it by saying that while genocide is bad, the Palestinian people must be eternally oppressed and pushed down because if they are not, they might come after the colonizers who oppress and murder them?
She actually tried the "defensive weapons" line
"I'm not giving them bombs to kill Palestinians, only anti-air missiles to shoot down any response to the genocide and keep it going without reprisal"
"Defensive weapons" is like the new Clean Wehrmacht Myth
Lethal Aid
Given she voted to give them anti-air missiles, it's more about Iran, not that that makes it much better
Anti-air systems were used extensively against Hamas and Hezbollah and Yemeni rockets as well
Basically, AOC, like most libs, only supports Palestinians if they're meek weak victims and children. As soon as they stand up for themselves and fight for their survival and lives then they deserve the Israeli missile. Hence the Liberal mantra during the genocide that this was "only about killing Hamas" and then Israel would stop. They wanted Israel to kill Hamas, and they give rhetorical cover to the genocide while claiming to oppose it.
Such "allies" are worse than useless. They're confused at best, zionist at worst, and actively wreaking havoc in the pro-Palestine community with their bullshit rhetoric and Hamas condemnations
i just want one (1) journalist ask the following questions any of the nato "socdem" ghouls:
do you support regime change in israel?
do you support striking abu dhabi over sudan?
do you support regime change war in saudi arabia? (over say, gay rights)
do you support nuclear strike on tel aviv over its nuclear program and genocide?
fucking cowards, the whole crowd of them, every single journalist is just a bunch of natsec worms
They would respond with the most squirmy wormy, limp, amorphous over-engineered disappointing responses you've ever heard
Implying they prepare for such caliber of questions, you have to understand, these are not rhetorically gifted people, half the politicians cost on pre-approved and prepared questions (she still fucked up taiwan, so lmao anyway)
god she fuckin SUCKS SO MUCH
lol uses "authoritarian" in all three fucking sentences. lot of heavy lifting for the clown word
More like reaffirms her support of NATO.
Saying "Rules based order" is peak liberalism
"To oppose Donald Trump we actually need more wars abroad, which is also what Trumps wants" - this lady
Iran(very much in Asia)
Social democrats and shitting the bed on foreign policy, name a more iconic duo.
the quiet guiding hand of NATOite fascist matt duss at work. behold, the berniecrat.
So she thinks our current geopolitical situation is the Star Wars prequels? Gotcha.
