this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2026
165 points (99.4% liked)

Pop Culture

117 readers
101 users here now

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 60 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Cannot wait to see all the dorks talk about how this is somehow "performative".

[–] ConcreteHalloween@hexbear.net 51 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

He's going to get performatively blown up by Marco Rudio.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] vovchik_ilich@hexbear.net 34 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

No but you see, he's totally just an anticommunist lib /s

[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 31 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

No but you see, he's totally just a champagne socialist tankie! /s

LOL the man cannot win.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PKMKII@hexbear.net 24 points 3 weeks ago (20 children)

Real activism is showing up to vote blue no matter who every other year in a deep blue district in a deep blue state

[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm so ready to vote! I'd vote twice right now if I could!

[–] Chapo_is_Red@hexbear.net 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Fraudulently voting twice in a state than already goes 70% Dem every election.

[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 9 points 3 weeks ago

maybe-later-honey maybe-later-kiddo If you're not willing to put it all on the line for democracy, I don't know what to tell you, kiddo. Let the adults do the strategizing.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 weeks ago

I wonder if the person who told me that the recent DSA delegation to Cuba, where they brought material aid, was "Just a field trip" feels the same way about this.

Breaking an Imperialist blockade is more important than libdunking online, folks.

[–] ConcreteHalloween@hexbear.net 59 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

All the "problematic" leftist internet figures keep putting their money where their mouth is. Maybe there was something to this Dirtbag Left thing.

[–] somename@hexbear.net 55 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Hasan's "problematic" aspect was never really the same as a lot of others. Sometimes he does get a bit libbed up, and into the electoral spectacle of it all, but he is a news commentator. He's a got a bit of that electoral horse race special interest in him, and a bit of good natured nativity. I think some of that has stripped away over time, as he's more and more hit with the grim reality of how static the system is.

But he's always been pushing an internationalist message towards the audience, about AES and US imperialism. Drip-feeding theory and challenging some of the popular misconceptions of revolutionary figures. It's not always to the same degree as what you'd see here, but he is a propagandist. The message isn't oriented directly at people who are already communists.

So to seem him do such a big action in support of Cuba isn't surprising at all to me in the ideological sense. Though it is of course a big move in real practical terms, and I'm surprised (and happy) in that regard.

[–] LaGG_3@hexbear.net 27 points 3 weeks ago

He's a got a bit of that electoral horse race special interest in him, and a bit of good natured nativity.

I always have to remind myself that he got started as the TYT nepo nephew, and that let's me be a bit more generous to him. He was probably the last person on that show that I imagined I would have any respect for in 10 years, but he's generally proved to be a real one (despite issues).

[–] mayo_cider@hexbear.net 24 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I've always felt he tries to push people to the left of his public position

He's been quoting Lenin too much to be a social democrat

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 20 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Well not all of them, where tf is Nick Mullen?

[–] ConcreteHalloween@hexbear.net 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Nick did endorse Zohran for what that's worth.

Also I think he's been pretty consistently pro-Palestine.

[–] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 36 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

i was listening to TAFS maybe 2 years ago and it was just nick and somebody like soder, just having this like mentally checked out conversation about how fucked up what israel was doing to gazans.

and soder was like, "so like, Hamas, aren't they the good guys?"

and nick says, "I don't know. probably. i don't pay much attention to all that stuff. I'm more of a Hezbollah guy anyway."

i laughed so hard i almost crashed the car.

[–] Chapo_is_Red@hexbear.net 32 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"I don't know. probably. i don't pay much attention to all that stuff. I'm more of a Hezbollah guy anyway."

Gonna make this my response whenever people ask me to condemn Hamas

[–] GoodGuyWithACat@hexbear.net 22 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

"They're no PFLP but you can't argue with their love for the game."

[–] Chapo_is_Red@hexbear.net 15 points 3 weeks ago

I don't think Mullen would self-identify as dirtbag left, he'd probably dislike it. So, let's keep calling him one

[–] CHOPSTEEQ@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 weeks ago

Hopefully cutting wood in a cabin in the mountains like he deserves.

[–] somename@hexbear.net 50 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)
[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 33 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I knew there would be tweets like these.

[–] Emmet@midwest.social 30 points 3 weeks ago

Ultras 🤝 Wreckers 🤝 Liberals 🤝 Fascists

Bulwarks of the Status Quo

[–] thefunkycomitatus@hexbear.net 31 points 3 weeks ago

haha bruh is so scared of going on the flotilla that he's actually going on the flotilla lmao bruh :skull:

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 18 points 3 weeks ago

all the flotilla

Zionist, opinion discarded.

I hope someone explained to them that the situation has changed a bit from when Hasan said that before.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 43 points 3 weeks ago
[–] spectre@hexbear.net 30 points 3 weeks ago

Uncritical support

[–] UmbraVivi@hexbear.net 28 points 3 weeks ago

Turkish man good shrug-outta-hecks azan

[–] GenderIsOpSec@hexbear.net 27 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

hey, that's my funny newsman holo-point-1-baubau hasan-stfu holo-point-2-baubau

[–] UmbraVivi@hexbear.net 11 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

what the hell we have fuwamoco emotes??

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] 3rdWorldCommieCat@hexbear.net 19 points 3 weeks ago

I might have some criticisms of Hasan but this is based as hell. Dirtbag left stays winning.

[–] Egonallanon@feddit.uk 18 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

More of a legal question than anything but if he and any other US citizens take part in this would it constitute a violation of the US embargo of Cuba and put them at risk of imprisonment?

[–] InexplicableLunchFiend@hexbear.net 29 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

These flotillas are by definition illegal. They are attempts to run the blockade with civilians

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SerialExperimentsGay@hexbear.net 24 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The US doesn't have functional rule of law anymore, but yes, this does constitute a violation of the embargo. That's the point, actually. Most non-violent resistance that deserves to be called resistance is, in fact, completely centered around breaking unjust laws and publicly enduring the consequences of that to expose the injustice.

[–] sewer_rat_420@hexbear.net 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Isn't humanitarian aid exempt from such an embargo? This is why the Sumud Flotilla was legal, under international law (obviously won't stop the ICEraeli regime will seize the vessels anyway every time)

[–] SerialExperimentsGay@hexbear.net 11 points 3 weeks ago

In the case of this embargo, humanitarian aid is not illegal, but needs to be authorized by the respective US federal government authority. Which they are not gonna do in this case obviously.

With embargos in general, it depends on the case - unilateral sanctions by the US are particularly bad at causing civilian deaths due to being specifically aimed at worsening living conditions under the pretense of facilitating regime change. This is why the sanctions against Iraq killed about as many people as the invasion under Bush jr. The same kind of massive excess mortality could never been shown for multilateral UN sanctions, which are much, much more limited in scope. Basically, the US (and to some degree the EU) treats sanctions as a means of geopolitical social murder, whereas the rest of the world doesn't.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mayo_cider@hexbear.net 18 points 3 weeks ago

Didn't they watch the nuke?

[–] Spike@hexbear.net 16 points 3 weeks ago

Well fair fucks to him

[–] Aquilae@hexbear.net 14 points 3 weeks ago

Hell yeah that's sick

load more comments
view more: next ›