this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2026
68 points (97.2% liked)

News

35692 readers
2798 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It’s not yet clear how the FBI collected the video. Experts said in some cases it’s possible to collect data from the complex infrastructure that has enabled cloud-based cameras.

Shortly after Nancy Guthrie disappeared, Pima County, Arizona, Sheriff Chris Nanos said that a camera affixed to her door had been disconnected, that she did not have a subscription that would have saved video and that investigators were trying to work with a tech company on the difficult forensic task of recovering any video.

Against those odds, they were successful. More than a week after her reported disappearance, that video was revealed, marking the most significant public development in a case that has captured the nation.

An internet-connected Google Nest camera captured an unidentified person in a mask and gloves and carrying a backpack and a gun approaching Guthrie’s home just before she disappeared. FBI Director Kash Patel said the bureau was able to collect the video from “backend systems.”

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Google just handed it over like they do to literally any request from any law enforcement without giving it a second thought.

[–] MyFriendGodzilla@lemmy.world 19 points 12 hours ago

"Backend systems" so the servers then? It was on the servers.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (4 children)

I don’t expect the same would happen if the person wasn’t related to a TV personality.

Also, this brings into question whether deleted data is in fact deleted.

[–] Carmakazi@piefed.social 24 points 14 hours ago

I suspect this is a bold-faced lie and they basically just had to ask Google for the footage, because Google doesn't follow their own policies or the law when it comes to privacy.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Deleted data is pretty much never immediately deleted. For drive storage the pointer to the location on the drive gets deleted, but the data is still there until it's overwritten. In databases it's flagged in a way where it's ignored by the system, but it's still there.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

They weren’t doing disk level data recovery for this. At best it’s a backup but I suspect it’s just “back end” as in “we have it but the customer can’t see it until they pay for a subscription”

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

From what I've read they were doing disk level data recovery, just across multiple servers.

And they specifically say video from before you subscribe isn't available when you subscribe. I thought it was dumb because that's an easy selling point.

[–] dondelelcaro@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I don't know the details, but I'd expect an object store was being used (GCP Cloud Storage) and then the question is what the object retention policy is on each stage of the processing pipeline. It's possible that they had to go to the underlying storage, but it probably didn't even take that.

[–] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 16 points 14 hours ago

Clearly the "deleted" data isn't deleted, and you are right, if this were an ordinary person the police wouldn't have done a damn thing.

[–] DougHolland@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago

Yup, our 'security' comes from being unimportant nobodies. If for any reason The Powers That Be want to see 'security' footage, they'll find a way.