this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2026
156 points (89.4% liked)

World News

53706 readers
3316 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from : https://lemmy.zip/post/58909207

Mass tree planting in China is turning one of the world's largest and driest deserts into a carbon sink, meaning it absorbs more carbon from the atmosphere than it emits, new research reveals.

"We found, for the first time, that human-led intervention can effectively enhance carbon sequestration in even the most extreme arid landscapes, demonstrating the potential to transform a desert into a carbon sink and halt desertification," study co-author Yuk Yung, a professor of planetary science at Caltech and a senior research scientist in NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, told Live Science in an email.

top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 hours ago

CCP greenwashing.

[–] Sepia@mander.xyz 64 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah, that's great 'news.'

Just two months ago, in December 2025, the same news has been published by the same outlet and written by the same author (see here).

Reuters new agency reported about that already in November 2024.

And this is by far not everything. The web is full with it. This same story has been appearing in the various outlets for several years now, mostly citing a 'new' study or 'Chinese state media' reports so that there is a reason to present it as 'new.'

And it's not the first time that OP is repeatedly posting the same 'news' over and again, just with a different framing, and obviously only to make China look good and to promote its propaganda.

[–] A_A@lemmy.world 16 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

First time i hear of this great news and happy for once to hear a little bit about propaganda that is not from USA and pro environment.

Now : Tiananmen Square massacre has been an atrocious tragedy and China's help in ruSSia invasion of Ukraine is horrible.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

While I applaud any government for attempting to better the environment, I really wish this project was done with more forethought.

Unfortunately they have done this forestation primarily with fast growing poplar and willow trees, making a vast monoculture that wont likely last in such a harsh climate for more than a decade.

Without the natural biodiversity that supports a living Forrest ecology, it only takes one disease or pest to wipe all that effort. In the end it might do more harm than good when considering the amount of ground water something like this will take out of the water cycle.

[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

Yes, but both tree species tend to live fast and die young, so they can be used to provide first-generation forest protection until the second-generation trees can grow up.

[–] HumanDent@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Lol, I was gonna say this account has made 3.4k posts in 7 months. It's just an unlabeled bot to throw on the pile of blocked accounts.

[–] A_A@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Nice observation : at least 10k comments should back these 3k+ posts, allas, only about 50 (so 0.05k) comments there ... a bit concerning i say.

[–] HumanDent@lemmy.zip 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

My rule of thumb is if a user has more than one post a day on average, I block them. At least on my other account I did that.

I don't think regular people post that frequently. If they do, it's likely just manual irritating spam.

[–] A_A@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

you wrote :
" ... the main issue is that Lemmy is a fraction of the size of Reddit ..."
let me guess that you are feed up with censorship at Reddit ... i left it about 3 years (4?) ago ... after they blocked access through "api" so that Teddit was blocked.

[–] HumanDent@lemmy.zip 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Haha, yea. I also left Reddit when the API change happened.

I thought I was breaking the Voyager app with the number of accounts and communities I was blocking on my original account, so I made this new one. I needed to force close the app whenever I tried viewing the whole blocked list...

[–] A_A@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Currently i only block about 125 users and out of these 11 have been banned ... at one point, maybe a year ago, i may have blocked 500 ... never used an application though.
Too much an intensive use (of social madium) may lead to stress and tendency to downVote, i went through that.

[–] HumanDent@lemmy.zip 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I rarely down vote, but apparently I've blocked 7148 users/communities/instances on my first account.

[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 20 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

That sounds awesome, can an independent third party news agency go into China and take pictures to confirm?

[–] perestroika@slrpnk.net 7 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

My viewpoint: turning it into a carbon sink is likely true. A desert is near carbon neutral in its natural state anyway. Not much grows and not much decomposes. Adding even a bit of vegetation turns it into a carbon sink, but the number next to the minus sign will be very small, considering the total area.

Takla Makan is big (for those acquainted with Europe, about the size of Germany). Planting great numbers of bushes, shrubs and trees along the edges and the river beds will contain its shifting and spare settlements on the edges from the nuisance, but the desert remains a desert.

There is no need to confirm, they've published more than a bit about it. China has been working on containing the desert since 1978. A road was built across the desert more recently, in 1995, and a railway around it. They intend to drill a 11 km research hole to study the local region of the Earth's crust. They intend to produce solar power.

Locals... well, this is Xinjiang. Locals mostly aren't Han (ethnically Chinese) but various Turkic peoples, including the seriously repressed Uyghurs. They would probably fear a mass of Han Chinese moving in more than a mass of sand, but they are most likely OK with the trees, because sand pesters them just as badly. So far, it looks like not much is happening in that part of Xinjiang, because there is not much to build an economy on. Solar power is nice, but if sand buries it, it's not so great. Currently, if you build a solar power plant to a random place in Takla Makan, there is a considerably above-zero chance of the desert burying it. Fencing it with lots of trees (irrigation needed) will allow a project to perhaps operate long enough.

[–] a4ng3l@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Am on mobile rn and can’t easily search myself but such a large endeavour could be visible from google maps maybe? Even between 2 snapshots ?

[–] x00z@lemmy.world -2 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

There's people in China that put sticks in the ground to make it look like vegetation, and they even paint vegetation green to make it look more healthy. Looking at low quality satellite pictures like Google Maps is unreliable.

[–] a4ng3l@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

Yo at some point that very idea seems more efforts than planting actual trees… few months ago a French YouTuber (Tev) went deeeeeeeep into one of those Chinese desert and filmed greenery in the middle of it. Like a whole garden thingy built just for the lols or something.

Chinese are crafty and industrious fuckers, once they set to something they generally make it happen. Sometimes it’s swallows sometimes it’s trees I guess…

[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 2 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Source? That sounds unbelievable honestly

[–] Dearth@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

They stick hay in the sand to create wind breaks that trap moisture and seeds to stop the expansion of the desert. Hundreds of acres with 1 meter grids of hay pressed into the dunes. Ive never seen anyone painting anything but i don't doubt some anti- communist propagandist is saying they are

[–] Zanshi@lemmy.world 0 points 16 hours ago

You can make fun of it, but when party officials come to see, you bet your ass there will be local politicians forcing people to do so. They did the same in Poland.

[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone -1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

And while they're at it, make sure that the people who completed such a feat were adequately paid for their time and given the rights and good working conditions.

What?... it was indentured minorities? Ah yeah, I figured.

Probably fertilized the soil with the blood of the Uyghurs they've got in concentration camps.