this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2026
280 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

80978 readers
4614 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pkjqpg1h@lemmy.zip 3 points 35 minutes ago

Strongly disagree with these allegations and are confident the evidence will show our longstanding commitment to supporting young people.

lawyers are funny

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 3 points 52 minutes ago

Why does everyone talk about children as if adults aren't susceptible to the same mechanisms?

[–] thlibos@thelemmy.club 1 points 37 minutes ago

Gee, I wonder if the corporations will win these cases?

[–] patruelis@lemmy.world 24 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

In don't trust big corporations at all. Greedy mammoths with deep pockets buying politicians.

Partially to blame are the parents as well who shove tech in front of the kids to shut them up.

Its a fked up timeline.

[–] Toes@ani.social 6 points 2 hours ago

I was in a store and saw a toddler walking around with a $2000 phone. The mom took the phone from her just for a second. The kid screamed so loud. The kid demanded the phone back immediately. She folded and gave it back. All they were doing was watching a looping video of fish...

[–] omcgo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Get their kids to shut up, because the greedy coperations now require both parents to work sometimes multiple jobs whilst the wealth pools towards the sociopathic owners.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 68 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I’m afraid they‘ll get a slap on the wrist and be forced to introduce face ID or something equally harmful for users after politicians get involved. I don‘t trust these things anymore when „it‘s about the children!“

[–] JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world 11 points 7 hours ago

I’m with ya. Especially with the blatant kiss assery from these two companies to the government, this headlines reads to me as “Google and Meta have agreed to give Trump even more money so that they can add even more surveillance to their products”

[–] kalkulat@lemmy.world 21 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (3 children)

"addiction in children’s brains"

I don't think these corporations deliberately aimed their content at any age group. Kids are not ready for alcohol or cars or pron. Did the corporations care? Probably not. Would they have at one time, here in the US? Yes, back when legislators were answerable to their constituents. At one time the FCC worried about the lyrics in songs on the radio. The population was more uptight about it. Then.

OTOH: I recall times when parents oversaw what their children consumed. They didn't need to buy them smartphones or laptops, and they could have enforced rulse on their use. Parenting isn't for everyone.

[–] a4ng3l@lemmy.world 1 points 24 minutes ago

Dude… kids are fucking cows to milk… in Europe we have special protections for them bundled in GDPR because they are sooooooo good targets with soooooo much potential. To give you some food for thought ; Microsoft is pushing their products as soon as schools so that kids are hooked. And they are far from being the worse….

[–] AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 15 points 9 hours ago

I don’t think these corporations deliberately aimed their content at any age group.

Instagram intentionally targeted ads at teenagers specifically when they were identified as feeling low self worth or depressed. https://techcrunch.com/2025/04/09/meta-whistleblower-sarah-wynn-williams-says-company-targeted-ads-at-teens-based-on-their-emotional-state/

Instagram used this data to more effectively keep teens hooked on the app. For example, they'd show a girl who just deleted a selfie out of embarrassment more photos of attractive women, which she would then likely scroll through, attempting to internally figure out how she could become attractive like them. Coincidentally, the perfect time for Instagram to then serve an ad for a new skin cream, weight loss program, etc.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 24 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

YouTube explicitly has a service for children and I'm sure Facebook discovery would prove they explicitly market for children.

[–] forrgott@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 10 hours ago

Facebook specifically was aware that teenage girls were especially harmed by their algorithms, so naturally, instead of reducing that harm, they leaned into it.

[–] kalkulat@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Wouldn't doubt it if they did market to kids. TV networks did it for decades, every Saturday morning, with no FCC challenges.

PBS had services for children as well. Were Bert and Ernie or Mr. Rogers 'addictive'? I have no idea what YT for children is like, but I wouldn't have handed my kids over to them to babysit without checking them out ... frequently. Corporations exist for one purpose. Will government stop them?