this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2026
295 points (98.7% liked)

politics

28174 readers
3068 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dizzle18@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

I motion to officially change the name of these files to the “Trump files.” Pretty clear who the main character is at this point.

Trump is a pedo-files

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 16 points 13 hours ago

I honestly figured that once we saw the Epstein Files, we'd see lots of names more than Trump, but as it turned out, not so much. As usual with Trump, the truth always turns out to be far worst than our worst imaginations, because he's really just that bad.

Even Epstein said there isn't a good cell in his entire body, and that he was "evil."

[–] ikies@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

I just don't get it... why can't these rich and powerful white dudes just have sex with women who are phonologically/mentally/legally MATURE enough to do so...

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

The crime and taboo nature is probably part of the thrill

[–] Zink@programming.dev 1 points 3 hours ago

I bet some of the worst of them are psychopaths who don't directly enjoy it as much as they enjoy proving that they can do it and get away with it. Because they're special. They're better than everybody else. Clearly. /s

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Because then they'd be more likely to say no.

[–] dizzle18@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

You mean to tell me women might find an obese man who paints himself orange, shits his pants, and has a micropenis shaped like a mushroom unattractive?

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

I'd be able to pretend to look past all of that for that sweet cash money.

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Shocker, I know.

[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 15 points 14 hours ago

This would be great, if someone actually did something about it.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 30 points 19 hours ago (8 children)

Why didn’t Biden release them before the election?

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 20 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Because the entire global ruling class is implicated, and Biden is a loyal capitalist whose material interests lie with protecting the status quo, even if that means allowing his fellow capitalists to rape children with impunity.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I'd love for things to be status quo again right now trying to make things better through strategic primaries then trying to survive Trump's private army.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago (5 children)

Well, that's not going to happen. We live in the world we live in, so maybe instead of wasting time wishing that we didn't, we should focus on actions that can actually change the world, like organizing the working class to break free from the chains of the capitalist pedophile class.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ikies@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Why didn't Trump do it in 2016??? lol

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

Good question.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 13 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Not to defend this but you know that if he did, MAGA would have the excuse that this was all a big Democrat hoax. They can't claim that now.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 10 points 16 hours ago

Yeah now they claim it’s not important and defend not releasing it. Don’t make excuses for terrible inaction.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I mean the real answer to their question is that Biden believed in an impartial DOJ.

[–] myserverisdown@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

No the hell he didn't. If he did, he wouldn't have rightly pre-pardoned himself and his family members.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Biden did not pre-pardon himself.

Five of his relatives but not himself.

[–] myserverisdown@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Noted. I was just going off my own recollection rather than verifying.

[–] nieminen@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Additionally, as I understand it, it was still in active investigation in 2024. Also, he can't just "release the files", it required an act of Congress to be released.

Do I think he should have tried? Yes, but I'd be 0% surprised if he's all over them too.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Actually, I'm pretty sure he hasn't been mentioned at all so far, not sure how accurate this is, but it says more or less the same - https://factually.co/fact-checks/politics/joe-bidden-epstein-files-e8c67a

[–] nieminen@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Yeah, I don't suspect he's in there, just wouldn't be surprised

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

If Biden is all over them you don’t think Trump would release every mention of him?

[–] mimic_dev@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It's much more likely he's in someone's pocket and they're in there. And Trump's just not aware of the connection between the two

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 2 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

I can see him not releasing information to protect Israel but I’m sceptical he’s bought by an individual.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

"skeptical" is the word you're looking for. Just fyi.

[–] HermitBee@feddit.uk 1 points 4 hours ago

"British English" are the ones you're looking for. Them or "patronising".

[–] nieminen@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I can see it either way. But I agree it's more likely the old bastard is protecting Israel like he always has.

Just saw the aipac warchest is like $80m for the midterms.... But if they pass this new law about requiring passport and/or birth certificate to vote, we're gonna be hosed. Only half of Americans have a passport, and many millions don't have access to their identifying records.

Edit: fixed dollar amount

[–] jve@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

$80b for the midterms

Off by a factor of 1000, but still way too much.

[–] nieminen@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Thanks for that, forgot the exact, and assumed billions because that seems to be everything these days. Fixed it.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Also, he can't just "release the files", it required an act of Congress to be released.

I don't think this is true. It only required Congress in this instance, because Trump was never going to do it unilaterally.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I was told a president can declassify whatever they what just by thinking about it.

[–] nieminen@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

I believe that's not necessarily the case with active investigation documents, that could easily muddy the legal process of an active case.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

The rot goes all the way up. I know Biden wanted to do things "the right way" but white houses in the past have leaked information to the people. Biden's administration could have given the unredacted files to the media through a whistleblower. That's what needs to happen now. The only way we are going to know the truth is if the files go public through none government means.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

They only release 3m files because trumps implicated in the other 3m

[–] nieminen@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago
[–] shittydwarf@sh.itjust.works 39 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

So more than 1/3 of all Epstein files?

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 hours ago

Wasn't the ~3 million files number that have been released only like 2% of the total?

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 35 points 21 hours ago

Probably the pages where his name was mentioned tended to have more than one mention.

And then there's that one page they found in Donald Trump's handwriting where the same phrase is repeated over and over hundreds of times, "All work and no play makes Donald Trump rape little children." That's a joke. You know it's a joke because Donald Trump has never actually worked in his life.

[–] bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

That's astounding. Was this like his full-time job for decades?

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 36 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Nah, his job has always been golfing; like the presidency, child rape was just a hobby. Some under-18 hole after a long day of 18-hole.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›