this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2026
76 points (96.3% liked)

Selfhosted

56183 readers
1013 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I bought into the ecosystem while taking my networking cert classes back in 2017. They were much cheaper than Cisco gear for business-grade networking, and overall I've been happy with them.

Their security offerings are locally managed, and you can make local accounts, but I just bought a NAS from them and I had to sign in with my ubiquiti account first before I could make a local account, and it seems the cloud account has some privileges that you can't give to local super admins.

So now I'm having second thoughts. I figure since it's enterprise-grade stuff they can't really make it cloud-dependent like you see on the consumer side since a lot of companies need air-gapped networks. On the other hand, on those occasions that I didn't have internet access and hadn't yet made a local-only account, I was locked out, so...

Regarding the NAS specifically, I use a TruNAS system at work and it works well enough on a rack server, but since it uses ZFS I don't know it would be good for home use. What alternatives are there?

Are there any truly FOSS networking options? I figure especially on the switching side you need purpose-built hardware, right? There aren't generic motherboards with 48 network ports you can buy.

I like my Unifi setup, I'm just scared of a rug pull.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HaveAnotherTacoPDX@lemmy.today 2 points 3 hours ago

People seem to love it. But it's highly proprietary and there seems to be planned obsolescence built into their model

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Wifi: Neat
Anything else: Havent tried.

Abstracting so much away from the admin by automagically comnfguring everything is neat but also dangerous as you'll never know what it has configured for you.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

That's not really how it works

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago

How so?
Exactly how I have it at home right now.

[–] johnnixon@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I've run OPNsense, PFsense, OpenWRT, and high end consumer routers and I've found Unifi the most stable. I'm also less able to screw it up and I've had to divert functions to VMs because I couldn't do it on my UDM. But having Internet service fail over with notifications that the normies in the house can understand is helpful. Then being able to find the WI-FI password for the Iot network from the app is helpful. VLANS by port through a pretty simple WebUI is helpful. Their handing of power (do they support NUT yet?) and redundant links is less good. I get errors when I have two routes between switches like I broke something. I've brought the network down due to STP not stopping loops but I also don't know what the hell I'm doing. I'd do it again though.

For NAS, ceph storage plus NextCloud plus WebDAV has been good lately but I'm sure I'm leaving performance on the table. It's just hard to break.

[–] fraksken@infosec.pub 2 points 12 hours ago

I'm in the process of updating m homelab. Threw out the qnap nas, replaced it with a homebuild nas on Truenas (4x8TB HDD, 4x1TB SSD). Replacing my ubiquity edgerouter pro 8p with a Mikrotik hEX refresh. About a 10x speedup for throughput, 20x smaller, 1/4 power consumption. Next I'll be looking to replace my edgeswitches. I can run them stand alone, so there's no rush.

I am not going to buy myself deeper into ubiquity. I'll just try to optimize for the current needs.

If you want true foss, run pfsense or opsense on your own hardware.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

I like them. Got the whole house set up with it. Yeah, big corp IT gear will have security risks. I used PoE setups to not need to run electrical to the WAPs, used an AirMax directional antenna to get wifi at an outbuilding without needing to run cable or a powerful outdoor WAP for mesh or whatever broadcasting my wifi all over the neighborhood. Works great, stable, a bit fiddly to set up but once it's set up it’s golden. I recommend buying used off ebay for all gear except the cloud key controller.

[–] philpo@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not a fan. Absolutely not.

They had multiple security incidents which they kept under the rugs for a long time, they have the tendency to EOL devices without warning (which then means you need to replace your sometimes 9month old device or your whole enviroment can't be updated), their lock-in into their ecosystem is much more complete as they can't be used properly without their enviroment.(e.g. Omada devices can work without the Omada stuff, with Unifi you will always need a controller for some functions).

So if you realy need SDN features like Unifi look at Omada,otherwise Mikrotik is a solid alternative. (And OPNsense for firewall)

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 0 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

TPLink had security issues all the same

[–] philpo@feddit.org 2 points 5 hours ago

Absolutely, but unlike Ubiquiti they did not keep them under the rug that long. (Nevertheless: Both are shit for firewalling. Put a OPNsense before it?)

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

OpenWRT?

It isn't really a vendor but it is Foss. It isn't as robust as vendor solutions but the advantage is that it will run anywhere.

Try stay away from their cheap consumer side stuff, they underspec the hardware and fill it with (useful) bloat that the hardware can barely run.

[–] zo0@programming.dev 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For large networks with over 20 devices, I find them acceptable not because they are good but because other options are more expensive.

For small networks? I despise them

  1. The UI keeps changing and moving around settings for no good reason after each update
  2. You can't setup devices directly if you have a device or two, you are required to setup a control center
  3. The control center is already slow and sluggish, but the real nightmare starts when you start having 100 or more devices
  4. Last couple of years they have been releasing batches with serious issues, software and hardware. The way they accepted recall for unfixable devices was so limited that many people are left with broken APs that will kill their network occasionally and the poor consumer has no idea why.
  5. Honestly fuck 'em. there's more but I don't wanna give them any more rent space in my head on a Sunday lol
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What annoys me most is people mindlessly promoting Unifi. Sure it has its advantages but no one wants to talk about disadvantages

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 3 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Anecdotal: I like like my OG UDM. Bought it the year it came out. No issues in almost 7 years.

Unifi is one of those brands where this phrase applies: "when it works, it works really good."

People will see those comments, buy the hardware, and some of them will have bad experiences. You will hear about those bad experiences way more often than someone who hasn't had any issues with the same hardware in the same timeframe.

That's how it is with pretty much every consumer-focused network equipment brand.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My biggest gripe with them is consistency. They release products without all the features they promise. They have been known to just abandon entire lines (I'm still salty about their mFi gear).

I like my UDM pro however the SE came out and for almost a year they basically ignored the Pro.

Good hardware that's usually made or broken by their software.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

The switches did get L3. Eventually.

[–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Are there any truly FOSS networking options?

PFSense falls into this category for routers. Netgate makes hardware specifically for it, but you don't have to buy anything from them to use PFSense. I only mention them because their hardware is good and you can buy anything from a normal home router to enterprise level gear.

I had to sign in with my ubiquiti account first before I could make a local account

I used to be pretty into ubiquiti, but this requirement really put me off. I have no desire to do anything 'cloud' with my router. This requirement sent me elsewhere and I sold off all my ubiquiti equipment.

TruNAS .... What alternatives are there?

TruNAS has a community edition, so you could start there. Other alternatives are a standard Debian install, use mdadm to setup RAID, then setup a network share in the OS, etc.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago

Use opnsense instead.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 42 points 1 day ago

Pfsense is shady on the OSS side these days. I think. I haven’t gotten into the drama. Opnsense is a popular fork.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

We use it exclusively at work, it's great for almost anything

[–] tophneal@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 day ago

Opinion wise: love unifi for networking equipment. Especially since that equipment doesn't require the web account. For a Nas, I'm in too deep already, I'll only use equipment I fully control. I wouldn't buy a Unifi NAS just like I wouldn't buy a Synology, but I'll keep leaning on my Unifi stuff as long as it keeps doing its job well.

As for using TrueNAS w/ZFS at home, go for it if you know and like it! I actually was recently given my boss's old home NAS that used to run his Plex server. When I got it it was still on FreeNAS (same thing, just a few versions behind) and it's using ZFS. Worked for him, and now works for me, no problem. Both of us also use Unifi equipment for our networks. The only problems we've ever had were our own doings.

[–] rimu@piefed.social 16 points 1 day ago

OpenWRT is basically Linux for routers and can be installed on a variety of devices - https://openwrt.org/

There is also https://www.gargoyle-router.com/

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Tplink Omada doesn’t need a cloud connection. There’s plenty of other reasons to not like Omada but it’s something to consider. It’s also dirt cheap.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

TPlink Kasa smart gear didn't used to need a TPlink account until they made an app update. I would be very wary of anything from them.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I buy TPLink gear, but only because I check to make sure it can be flashed with OpenWRT beforehand. I may not actually do that (my router is running it, but my PoE access points aren't yet), but I make damn sure I can.

(Also, I almost bought Kasa smart plugs, then checked to see whether they could run ESPHome or Tasmota and picked a different brand instead. You always have to check, every single time!)

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I have a UCG-Ultra driven network infrastructure with 3 switches and 7 APs at home. I wouldn't use their NAS options though. For NAS I just have 20TB of spinning disks sitting there attached to my ProxMox for all my data, and have all services in VMs or LXCs. I set up an UnRaid (before it was a subscription) in my brother's house to backup off-site and sync it once per week.

[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I am quite satisfied with the unifi ecosystem so far as networking and CCTV systems go. They are cloud enabled without being cloud dependent. Since the early 2025 networking update, their routers are pretty good now. The UDM SE is a pretty compelling router/POEswitch/NVR in the home context.

Their NAS ecosystem is still very new and I would not it a viable option yet. They are also leaning towards the vendor lock-in direction with drives. Its the same reason I would stay away from Synology and QNAP.

Personally, I run a old desktop as a NAS/homelab running Proxmox(FOSS based hypervisor). I run ZFS on it and its "fine". It performs fine even with a mixed bunch of disks, provided you have them in pairs or groups of 3 that perform close to identically. I just run a Debian container on the Proxmox as my fileserver and a few VMs for homelabbing.

One player that works well in a home environment is UnRAID. It a Linux distor that runs on commodity hardware and handles redundancy with "just a bunch of disks" better than most. The UI is friendly to non technical users. The catch is that UI is commercial software. Many consider it a fair exchange for the convenience it brings.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] redlemace@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I only use their WiFi because I got some in- and outdoor ap's for free. The Wifi manager is selfhosted and has no internet access. For upgradesi downoad the deb file, trasnsfer and install. It's not the best out there, but works for me and i'm still happy with it.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago (11 children)

I have an edge router and switch, and two unifi APs. All accounts running locally. Works fine for my uses, though I think if I had it to do over again I'd investigate pfsense or opnsense. Not sure about hardware tho.

since it uses ZFS I don't know it would be good for home use

TrueNAS is all I've used for my home for the better part of a decade. It's been fine, what is your concern?

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

I run Ubiquity AP (used to be flashed to OpenWRT but now stock) as well as Mikrotik, all local. Firewall is opnsense. NAS is FreeNAS, but not really use it at the moment. zfs is great. If you really need 48 port L3 switches, look into whitebox. I use used enterprise gear for lab, too much noise and power draw and no real use for terabit L3 at home.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

I use their WiFi access points. They're great. That's about it.

[–] Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyz 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I've seen in this thread:

Fewer Letters More Letters
AP WiFi Access Point
DNS Domain Name Service/System
LXC Linux Containers
NAS Network-Attached Storage
NFS Network File System, a Unix-based file-sharing protocol known for performance and efficiency
NUC Next Unit of Computing brand of Intel small computers
NVR Network Video Recorder (generally for CCTV)
PCIe Peripheral Component Interconnect Express
Plex Brand of media server package
PoE Power over Ethernet
RAID Redundant Array of Independent Disks for mass storage
SSD Solid State Drive mass storage
Unifi Ubiquiti WiFi hardware brand
VPN Virtual Private Network
ZFS Solaris/Linux filesystem focusing on data integrity

[Thread #73 for this comm, first seen 8th Feb 2026, 03:10] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

[–] ccunix@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Just use switches and APs and I'm happy. Had 2 generations of AP and will eventually upgrade to the current ones, but am not in a rush.

I have no desire to expand beyond that, but the networking gear works well.

[–] probable_possum@leminal.space 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I use their wifi APs because they make them really easy to configure and manage. But the management interface stays locked in a vlan without access to the internets. Because I don't trust their cloud affinity.

This also disqualifies their routers and firewalls for me. How can I trust a device which tries to phone home? So that area is covered by opnsense on a device with a sufficient amount of Ethernet ports.

Any device with a mass storage can act as a NAS - a single board computer + Linux + samba/ nfs/ scp/ sftp. I heard TrueNAS or OpenMediaVault are recommended as all in one solutions - I don't know them.

[–] non_burglar@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

This is an opinion on the WiFi access points.

I took the unifi pill in 2018 on the advice of my devops coworkers that ubiquiti is set-and-forget. I also was sold on the unifi network controller I deployed and used until last month being easy to use and local only.

The single pane of glass to control and update the access points is nice. Wifi works OK. There are, however, several downsides:

  • channel and power management are not automatic and tweaking WiFi settings with unifi is not intuitive.
  • similar to your nas experience unifi advanced metrics are locked behind paying for other unifi equipment or an official controller.
  • network appliance is built on mongodb and its performance is pretty abysmal (Up to 2.5GB memory to run it)
  • ~~the network appliance is now discontinued and self-hosting the network appliance can no longer happen software-only, you have to use their "server os", which can't be run in a container.~~ edit: its been pointed out to me that running the network controller in a container is possible.

After the unifi Debian repo stopped updating properly, I decided to install openwrt on my APs.

Not only did it work well, but performance is now much better with openwrt.

I'm personally stepping away from brands that have their own ecosystems from now on, if I can help it. The enshitification is just too tempting for them, it seems, and it it's always at our expense.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›