this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2026
153 points (98.7% liked)

LGBTQ+

4555 readers
6 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Lawrence Krauss, Richard Dawkins, Steven Pinker and other anti-trans influencers personally benefited from a right-wing academic social group backed by infamous human trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, sometimes meeting at his island.

all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

this video is related and was pretty good: https://skepchick.org/2026/02/epstein-files-reveal-how-pathetic-richard-dawkins-other-men-are/

[...] back in 2011 I criticized physicist Lawrence Krauss for defending his “friend” Jeffrey Epstein, years after Epstein was revealed to be a pedophile running a sex trafficking ring. Unbeknownst to me at the time, Krauss immediately forwarded my critical emails to Epstein, and they whined about what a mean bitch I was. And then in 2016, Krauss emailed quite a bit with Epstein to get his advice on how to deal with Buzzfeed reporters who were investigating Krauss’s long history of women reporting that he sexually harassed and even assaulted them, because of course he did! Epstein was able to evade justice for years after it was well known he was running an international pedophile ring, so surely he would know how to help Krauss wriggle out of some relatively tame attempted rape accusations, right?

But in 2011, a few months after my post about Lawrence Krauss defending Jeffrey Epstein, I was on a panel in Ireland with Richard Dawkins called “Communicating Atheism,” in which I talked about some of the crazy, misogynistic hatred I get by being a female atheist in the public eye.

A few days later on July 2nd, Dawkins posted a comment on PZ Myers’ blog mocking me for complaining about the treatment I get, comparing me to a fictional “Muslima” who isn’t allowed to drive and gets beaten by her husband. Misogynistic AND racist! Fun.

Unbeknownst to me, the day prior, July 4th 2011, Richard Dawkins reached out to John Brockman with a question. Brockman was a powerful New York literary agent who ran Edge.org, which was bankrolled by Jeffrey Epstein. Brockman served as a connection between Epstein and all the various scientists and public intellectuals Epstein wanted to meet, and so his name shows up a LOT in these files. Here’s what Brockman looks like, in a photo taken of him along with Steven Pinker, Daniel C. Dennett, Katinka Matson, and, oh, Richard Dawkins from one time they flew on Jeffrey Epstein’s plane together.

Brockman, naturally, immediately forwarded the letter to Jeffrey Epstein, which is how I can now read it. What interesting timing! Three months after Lawrence Krauss alerted Jeffrey Epstein to my evil machinations, Dawkins has decided to seek out information so that he might debunk my reporting that Epstein is a pedophile, just a few days after he posted an incredibly racist and sexist comment and was getting dragged for it. And before I had even commented on it!

Dawkins is mentioned in a lot of other files, but it’s all things like Epstein talking about hanging out with him and Krauss talking about getting him to the island, but obviously we already knew Dawkins knew and hung out with Epstein because there are photos. These guys didn’t care about leaving evidence because, as I mentioned in the previous video, they thought raping little girls was a normal thing that rich men are just allowed to do. And they were right, in a way.

[–] squirrel@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 days ago

Rebecca Watson 🖤

[–] Silic0n_Alph4@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh my god… or lack thereof.

I was reading a lot of atheist blogs way back when, trying to figure it all out, when the elevator incident brought the whole thing crashing down. I wasn’t interested in following the mud-slinging so left those blogs behind.

Now it turns out that fucking Epstein was involved??? Unbelievable. Is there anything that man didn’t ruin?

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Silic0n_Alph4@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Here’s a short and fairly neutral summary: https://pharyngula.fandom.com/wiki/Rebecca_Watson

What followed was an intense and brutal blog war.

[–] osanna@thebrainbin.org 24 points 2 days ago (4 children)

wait, richard dawkins is antitrans? that's disappointing :/

ETA: I read the rest. dawkins went on the lolita island? Sigh.

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Dawkins has been openly racist and islamophobic (not simply "outspoken atheist", but explicitly islamophobic) for a very long time now. Being transphobic is part of that package :\

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Funny how bigots are rarely just bigoted about one thing, isn’t it?

The root belief of bigotry is "there are groups of people that are inherently evil/lesser/worthless because of how they're born". Once you apply that to one group it's very easy to apply it to others.

That's why you gotta attack the root belief. It's not enough to say "bigotry against this group is wrong!" We have to reject bigotry at it's very core, if we don't we leave fertile ground for it to regrow.

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

Dawkins has been more of a liability than anything lately anyway. I’m not surprised. He’s a self professed “cultural Christian” which is to me the worst of all worlds.

It is essentially the position that “I’m a bigot even though no sky daddy is telling me to be.

Now if Hitch were there…I would be bereft.

[–] gressen@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago

Krauss is a huge disappointment as well.

I'm so tired 😣

improper use of single quotes in the title.