this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
531 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

80859 readers
3167 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Commission's investigation preliminarily indicates that TikTok did not adequately assess how these addictive features could harm the physical and mental wellbeing of its users, including minors and vulnerable adults.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1984@lemmy.today 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I think its too late. An entire generation had their brains fried. But yeah, better late than never.

Also the brain can actually recover. But it takes a lot of work.

For me, just reading a book is difficult now. The mind is not used to that kind of focus. My eyes go down the page, and then I realize ive been thinking of something else, and have to start over. This happens over and over again. But with practice, it gets easier.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Welcome to my life since forever

-A pre-internet ADHD person lol

Edit to add: Not to handwave the problem away, I think it is legit an issue. I also just thought that was funny.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 68 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Let me hold my breath waiting for something actually meaningful to be done about it, more than a "cost of doing business" protection payment.

[–] daw@feddit.org 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] db2@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

For ten years, and they can't restructure it away.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

great, do facebook products now.

[–] b_tr3e@feddit.org 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Meta got sued and had to pay €1,500 per user in a ruling of a supreme state court which can't be appealed. There's a wave of lawsuits expected to follow because this actually means every Facebook user (for now, it might be possible that non-users whose data were also collected will sue, too) can easily sue now. I remember Meta boasting to have the data of some 10M Germans for targeted advertising. Unfortunately that's hardly robust evidence but I hope they'll sue them to hell and back.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

i keep hearing about these companies getting fined, yet here we still are. when will heads start to roll?

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

yeah… here we are: Europeans with right to be forgotten and opt out of data collection

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

let me believe this next time there is a big data leak

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

well then they get massive fines for any data they leak

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i keep hearing about these companies getting fined, yet here we still are.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago

since GDPR came in TBH i haven’t heard of any EU data leaks… like sure they happen in the US all the time, but where the fines actually happen

same with australia: we’ve had pretty good privacy laws since like the 90s, and really we haven’t had a whooooole lot of breaches. there have been some high profile ones, but security is never a 100% kinda thing yknow

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The fines are too good a revenue source. Ireland would be fucked without the steady stream they represent.

All I every hear is how Ireland tries to avoid taking fines or tax from them.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Bravo EU!!!

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Anything owned by that pos Zionist Larry Ellison should be illegal

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago

Tech companies shouldn’t have these sorts of algorithmic profiles of people. It’s manipulation.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Add "YouTube Shorts" to the list, and fine them, too. They are doing the same, for the same reason.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Lemmy has infinite scrolling too so if lemmy get big it will have the same legal issue

[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago (3 children)

This includes features such as infinite scroll, autoplay, push notifications, and its highly personalised recommender system.

I don't think Lemmy (or any text based platform) really fits the bill

[–] ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Lemmy has a ton of media tho, its not entirely text based.

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But the algorithm isn't extremely personalized or optimized towards "engagement". In fact the only fediverse platform that comes close is Loops, and even that is light-years away from the psychological manipulation that goes into Tiktok algorithms.

[–] ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (5 children)

100% agreed, my only quibble was calling Lemmy a text based site.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Wait your app isn't like this?

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago

Nope. I turned off infinite scroll in the settings. I use the Voyager app, which paginates the feed when configured to do so.

[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

It has infinite scroll. It's not highly personalized like tiktok, it has auto play but there's FAR more text posts than videos, and the push notifications are far less extreme (is there even a setting to get push notifications for every upvote, like tiktok enables automatically?). Lemmy really isn't anything like tiktok.

[–] M137@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Did you miss the "autoplay and highly personalised recommender system"? Those are the two big major differences and what makes people so addicted to tiktok etc. in a much worse way than forums in all forms (like reddit and lemmy). Reddit and Lemmy doesn't have any thing that curates what you see based on your habits, that's done by yourself or not at all.

[–] Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 15 hours ago

But lemmy indeed triggers addictive behaviours on me.. But same does any news app….
Great way to flee from regional reality (Doing work, being social, talk to people, ho for a walk with the dog, do housekeeping, etc.)
Everything gets delayed when I am on here, but still, Iam writing this 🙃

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't think the EU would ignore it if it was only infinite scroll

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Are you sure? They have been ignoring virtually everything with infinite scrolling. TikTok is the extremely rare exception where they actually address it.

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 2 days ago (6 children)

There's a big difference between infinite scrolling content that's using algorithms to specifically keep you scrolling and how Lemmy does it. On Lemmy that's a you problem not a capitalism problem.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Oaksey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Not always infinite. If you set it to be the top posts for the last 12 hours for example, it isn’t that hard to get to the end, not like automatically chosen posts follow on or are inserted into that feed.

Not really, i have hit the limit 2 3 times. Maybe its a voyager feature but it definitely has a limit

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ZephyrXero@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

And what about all their copycats? Like Instagram and YouTube that are trying to do the same thing?

[–] morto@piefed.social 9 points 2 days ago

If this case gets a closure against tiktok, it will become a jurisprudence and will allow to do the same to them

[–] ageedizzle@piefed.ca 0 points 1 day ago

Loops too. It’s the fediverse version of TikTok. Would it also be illegal? 

[–] MrKoyun@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Cool! No one's surprised. Anyway. Nothing is gonna be done.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The big danger here, which these steps mitigate but do not solve are:

#1 Algorithmically curated content

On the various social media, there are systems of automated content moderation that are in place that remove or suppress content. Ostensibly for protecting users from viewing illegal or disturbing content. In addition, there are systems for recommending content to a user by using metrics for the content, metrics for the users combined with machine learning algorithm and other controls which create a system of controls to both restrict and promote content based on criteria set by the owner. We commonly call this, abstractly, 'The Algorithm' Meta has theirs, X has theirs, TikTok has theirs. Originally these were used to recommend ads and products but now they've discovered that selling political opinions for cash is a far more lucrative business. This change from advertiser to for-hire propagandist

The personal metrics that these systems use are made up of every bit of information that the company can extract out of you via your smartphone, linked identity, ad network data and other data brokers. The amount of data that is available on the average consumer is pretty comprehensive right down to knowing the user's rough/exact location in real-time.

The Algorithm used by social media companies are a black box, so we don't know how they are designed. Nor do we know how they are being used at any given moment. There are things that they are required to do (like block illegal content) but there are very little, if any, restrictions on what they can block or promote otherwise nor are there any reporting requirements for changes to these systems or restrictions on selling the use of The Algorithm for any reason whatsoever.

There have been many public examples of the owners of that box to restricting speech by de-prioritizing videos or restricting content containing specific terms in a way that imposes a specific viewpoint through manufactured consensus. We have no idea if this was done by accident (as claimed by the companies, when they operate too brazenly and are discovered), if it was done because the owner had a specific viewpoint or if the owner was paid to impose that viewpoint.

This means that our entire online public discourse is controllable. That means of control is essentially unregulated and is increasingly being used and sold for, what cannot be called anything but, propaganda.

#2 - There is no #2, the Algorithms are dangerous cyberweapons, their usage should be heavily regulated and incredible restrictions put on their use against people.

load more comments
view more: next ›