Exhibitionists: which hotel?
this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
223 points (97.9% liked)
World News
55539 readers
3783 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Voyeurs: which website?
Oh my god, so disgusting! Which site?
There’s a LOT of that stuff online. I dunno how they get away with it. Sometimes it’s like all in the same room, eventually someone is gonna know
load more comments
(21 replies)
Some have even resorted to pitching tents
That's usually how it gets started
Didn't read the whole article but first thought - he was fine viewing others but upset when he was filmed?
I thought it might be possible that he thought they were staged, but it sounds like the practice is well known and you know what you're paying for.
Posing as a consumer, I paid to access one of the livestreaming websites promoted by him - for a monthly fee of 450 Yuan ($65, £47).
Once logged in, I had the option to choose between five different filming feeds, each showing several hotel rooms - visible as soon as a guest triggered the electricity supply by inserting their key card. It was also possible to rewind livestreams from the start, and download archived clips.
Could have thought the people knew about it.
Yeah what a hypocrite lmao
Isn't there a method using your camera flash to detect cameras?
Rather than a flash, you could turn it on as a flashlight to look for reflections from hidden can lenses.
You can also point your phone camera around to look for the IR led on a hidden camera. Note that the rooms lights should be turned off and any curtains closed for this to make sure the hidden camera goes to "nighttime" mode. You can check if your phone will work for this using a good old fashioned remote control with an IR led and see how well its picked up by your phone.
You can also use your phone to check for WiFi networks that seem suspicious.
Don't forget Bluetooth. I have a handy app called "Bluetooth scanner" which scans for Bluetooth signals.
It creates a list with the names of the devices it finds, plus other info like the device's internal name, vendor name, BT address, signal strength, protocol and so on.
It even has a feature which helps you find the device based on changes in signal strength as you walk around.
The theory is to detect infrared light for the cam who utilise infrared night vision, but from the article it seems that they don't use that at all, so when the light's out no one can view anything. This might be the reason why it went undetected.
That's one method, also camera sensors have a retro-reflective effect that makes using a camera flash highlight other cameras in its field.
I suppose you could theoretically utilize the flash functionality in an attempt to catch some sort of glare/reflection back from the hidden camera's lens... maybe? This is just a guess, however, tbh, and I have my doubts of its efficacy against the borderline frighteningly tiny lenses in use on more modern equipment that is designed specifically to be hidden. The pricier gear could (potentially) even utilize special coatings or treatments intended to mitigate such a detection method for that matter, as there's clearly no shortage of money surrounding the... "industry," for lack of a better term.
I certainly wouldn't consider it a reliable test, that's for sure
Joke's on you. I'm into flash porn.
the real trick is to be a fat ugly American.
There's a kink for that.
Where? I’ll make an account and share for a bit of cash…
Share bud, there's ladies living in tents in hotel rooms. I'm considering it.
Hell, living in hotel rooms sounds intense enough as it is.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Not to disregard the issue, but the ISI does the same thing to generate blackmail.
Although considering the epstein files, that almost seems tame in comparison.
I have to wonder what would offense such an audience. Or put them at risk of something….
Maybe just put Disney films on and let the cameras illegally rebroadcast that. Let Disney fight them.
view more: next ›